Episodios

  • 561 Creative Problem Solving
    May 29 2024

    Japan has a lot of wisdom to share and one of my favourites is to not start with the solution to a problem. In Japan, the idea is to start with making sure you have the right problem to solve. This is not easy, because often we are super busy and moving at warp speed all the time, so just jumping in to fix a problem sounds like the best approach. There is a follow-on metaphor of the scaling of the wall. We work hard and progress rung by rung up the ladder, getting us to the top - the solution – only to find our ladder is up against the wrong wall. We don’t want that, do we?

    Problem definition is sometimes obscured by having a number of factors to confront and not enough insight into which are the priority items. This might be for a lack of a data or from conflicting opinions. The issue remains a large one, though, which we must deal with at the very start of the process.

    Here are some steps to consider in problem definition.

    Step One: Silence Is Our Super Power

    Once we get into an open discussion about identifying the problem, we can find we waste a lot of time and basically get no progress. We argue the toss on what to solve and can get stuck. Instead, have around six people in a team and have them all sit in silence and think. Now thinking is seriously hard work. It is particularly difficult for us today, because we are being corralled by algorithms spewing out one minute videos, fostering shorter and shorter concentration spans.

    Ask the team to sit there for fifteen minutes in Round One and do nothing but think and write their issues on Post-It notes. This will be torture for some and very challenging for most. Nevertheless, as the organiser, we have to have guts to ignore the fervent and persistent impatient glancing at watches, head shaking, eyes rolling, yawning, etc., that will go on, as the team is possessed by a wave of boredom.

    Step Two: Prioritise Issues

    After the first fifteen minutes, everyone stays in silence and now we spend 3 minutes to arrange what we have come up with into a broad priority listing of where to start.

    Step Three: Share Together - Round One

    Now we start putting our ideas up on a chart or a wall. We attach the Post Its in priority order to the wall and explain our thinking to our colleagues. There is no judgement allowed at this point, because we are still on the journey and we don’t need any decision being taken yet.

    Step Four: Whole Team Sharing

    Once we get our teams idea’s out, we share it with the other teams and they do the same for us. We try to cross pollinate the thinking going on. There is no evaluation of what has been produced at this point.

    Step Five: Think and Prioritise

    After that stimulation, again, in silence, we keep thinking for another ten minutes. This is very hard because all the easy ideas have been tapped. Now we have to really dig to find the gold. We will adjust our previous priorities based on our new ideas.

    Step Six: Share Together - Round Two

    We bring our Post-It notes and add to what we came up with in the first thinking bracket. Again, we share the content with our teammates.

    Step Seven: Whole Team Sharing Round Two

    Again, each team presents what they have come up with, so that all the teams can share in the ideas.

    Step Eight: Each Team Makes Selections

    By this stage, we will have had a lot of information shared and we will have a pretty good idea of where everyone has placed their priorities. Now we have to make some decisions about which will be the issues which we will take forward to solve. Each team will coalesce the possibilities into a short list.

    Step Nine: Whole Team Makes The Final Selections

    Each team presents their selections and then decisions are taken on which issues are going to be picked up to work on.

    There is usually a strong raft of similar issues which will have been highlighted. These commonalities make it easy to drive decisions about the final problems to work on. Remember, we are not after perfection here, so if we get good selections, then we are on the right track. We have created a hierarchy of issues to work with and we can get to them all over time. We start with what we consider the most burning issues.

    The next stage is to use creative thinking to work on how to solve the issues once clarified and we covered that in a recent episode already.

    Más Menos
    11 m
  • 560 The Big Badness Of Baidu’s EQ
    May 22 2024
    Founded in 2000, Baidu has 39,800 employees and is one of the largest global AI and internet companies. Based in China, its major success has been its search engine business. Its quarterly revenues ending June 2024 were $4.67 billion, so it is a substantial company. The Head of Public Relations and Vice-President, Ms. Qu Jing, posted a video on social media demeaning Baidu staff, telling them she “can make you jobless in this industry”. She told staff she demanded they must be dedicated enough to travel by her side for 50 days straight and she doesn’t care about the impact on their families and personal lives, noting, “I’m not your Mum”. Her mantra to the staff was “I only care about results”. She was proud to say she was so devoted to Baidu, that she didn’t know what school year her son was in. She publicly posted her video outlining her leadership philosophy as an example to her PR team of how to use social media to promote Baidu! Her professional skills in PR seem dubious to me. Also, her EQ or “emotional quotient” - her people skills - seems abysmal. From a Dale Carnegie “How to Win Friends And Influence People” viewpoint, this is a shocking leader mentality. As a so-called PR professional, her genius use of social media created a firestorm of virulent criticism of Baidu. She had to take the video down and apologise, saying she would “earnestly read people’s opinions and criticisms” and “deeply reflect” on them. Days later, she was gone. The company wasn’t saying the circumstances of her departure, but given the apparent brutality of their corporate culture, you can expect they had no hesitation in firing her. Ironically, hoisting her on her own petard, so to speak. There are so many things wrong with this Baidu story, it is hard to know where to start. Fundamentally, she was making a basic leader error to think that the staff wanted what she wanted. Her case may be extreme, but often as leaders, we do assume everyone wants to work as hard as we do, that they want to get promoted like we did and that they want to dedicate themselves to the business like we are. I don’t know why she was blind to the reality that actually staff do not necessarily want what we want and that they have their own goals, motivations, and desires. However, sometimes we can suffer from the same malady as Ms. Qu. The enterprise has goals and values and as the leader, our job is to get everyone to fly in the same direction, in formation. That means finding out what our team members want and then aligning the way we do the business to deliver what is important to the staff. It also requires us to understand their value system and again find lots of cross-over points where the organisation’s values fit in with the staff member’s values. The only way to do that is to communicate with the staff and through casual conversation, uncover what is important to them. Interrogating the team like a crime solving detective on their deeply held values isn’t the way to do it. Over coffee or lunch in an informal situation and built up gradually over time is the better approach. Creating a threatening video is definitely not the way to go and 99.99% of people would get that, even if Ms. Qu didn’t. Nevertheless, ask yourself, are you making an assumption about what your team wants, based on your imagination and no actual conversations with them? As the boss, we get busy and we are working away in the business and so are too busy to work on the business. This is a how things can slip by us and before you know it, the last time you have a meaningful conversation with your staff was years ago. That is okay, except that people’s lives change. They get married, have children, have to take care of aging parents, age themselves and what was important to them five years ago, isn’t the same today, but we don’t know that. Using fear as the driver for motivation like Ms. Qu does work, but it is a very blunt tool. Ms. Qu’s outburst is remarkable in an economy where there is a lot of job mobility. Those staff suffering the mad ravings of a demonic leader, can move to a better company, because they have choices. Japan is just the same and job mobility has never been higher or easier in this country. As the boss, we have to be aware of that and make sure that what we do and what we say are working well, to keep our people engaged and with us. What is the culture of Baidu? I don’t know, but if Ms Qu can become head of PR and rise to VP, then it would seem things are pretty rotten inside the organisation. What is the culture inside your organisation by comparison? In our case, we have set priorities around our values: number one is your health, number two is your family’s health and number three is the company health. Making that statement is one thing and living it is entirely different. This is where leadership comes in by being ...
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • 559 The Creativity Process When Leading In Japan
    May 15 2024
    The era of the boss who had done all the tasks in the section and was the main expert on the business has well and truly passed. Today, it is more of a team effort and there are a lot more specialisations required than in the past. Collaboration is the key to creativity by grouping all the brain power in one place and unleashing it to solve the problem. To my surprise, very few firms have any clear methodology on how to unleash the creative ideas of the team. So far, I have done over 200 interviews with CEOs here in Japan for my podcast “Japan’s Top Business Interviews”. I ask them all about their house methodology to harvest the ideas of their teams, and I am struggling to recall anyone who could answer that question well. Here are some things to think about to create your own house brand on idea development and creativity. Step One: Begin with the end in mind. What is it you want to achieve with this exercise? We are going to tie up the valuable time of a lot of key people, so the end must justify the means. What would success look like from doing this exercise? Step Two: Gather what we already know. We rarely start with zero knowledge of the issue. We have all built up experience and insights into this problem. We also have data we can access to provide some deeper perspectives on the issue. We need to create a common understanding amongst the team about the issue and it ramifications. Step Three: Clarify the question we are asking. Japan has a great insight about problem solving. Unlike in the West, in Japan, the answer to the question is secondary. Here deciding what is the right question to ask comes first, before worrying about any potential answers. That is quite smart isn’t it. There can be so many layers to the issue as well and we need to spend some quality time at the beginning to really clarify what is the main issue we should be aiming to solve while being washed around in a sea of competing issues. Step Four: Harvest the ideas. We start generating ideas with a strong proviso. There is no such thing as a dumb idea or crazy idea. Yes, of course, some ideas will be better, more practical than others, but we want to bring forth as many choices as possible before we start allocating priorities about which answers we will pursue. My crazy idea won’t go forward, but it may stimulate a better idea in your mind. This idea would never have come to light without the stimulation of you saying to yourself, “well that is a dumb idea but if we tweaked it like this, then we could….”. This is how idea generation works. We bounce our ideas around and fire each up to come forward with a better alternative. Step Five: Select the best ideas to take forward. Many ideas will emerge and at a point in time we have to make some selections. This is the most difficult part, because this is where we need a decision-making system which works well. Usually in Japan, the better ideas are harmonised and moved to the top of the tree. A good methodology is to find common themes and then isolate these themes out and rank ideas within those themes. Now we may have a disagreement about the order of the ideas generated, but if we take the top five ideas in the most commonly grouped themes we are in the right spot. Step Six: Find the money, time and authority to move forward. Ideas are great, but only become really great when applied. That takes investment. It might be dough or people’s time or the freedom to run the idea without interference or the means to overcome the idea killer - the NIHS – “Not Invented Here Syndrome”. We have to promote the ideas generated to the big bosses and convince them to get behind what we have come up with. There is absolutely nothing more soul destroying and spine decalcifying than to have your hard won ideas spurned by the machine and those who command it at the top. You feel you have wasted your life for nothing and are very reluctant to take part in any future creativity sessions. Step Seven: Start. We don’t need to be perfect, because we won’t know everything we need to know at the very start, but we can adjust as we move forward. This is a hard step for Japanese teams because they like to make sure everything is perfect and there is zero chance of failure. They would prefer to never harvest the future benefits, if there was a possibility of failure occurring on their watch. We have to make sure we give them permission to fail and make sure there is no blow back on anyone if it doesn’t work, otherwise it will never start. Step Eight: Tweak the ideas. Once we are underway, we learn so much more and we need to be flexible to analyse the results and to draw the right conclusions. Often we have insufficient data to really know what we are looking at, so we need patience to give the innovation time to work. As we better understand the situation, we can make adjustments to improve the results or the performance. ...
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • 558 Building Your Strategic Plan In Japan
    May 8 2024

    The leader has a different role to that of the manager. The manager makes the business run on time, to quality and on budget. The leader does all of those things, plus sets the strategic direction for the business, crafts the culture and builds the people. If we want to control every aspect of the firm, then we have to micro-manage everything. Obviously, that is a choice, but as the leader we need to develop our people too and so we need to delegate work to them so that they can grow. In fact, as the leader, the ideal situation would be that we are only working on the most high-level things that only we can do.

    If possible, we want to set the parameters of the business so that the team can self-manage themselves. Those parameters come in the form of some very useful tools called Vision, Mission and Values. Some people may think that Vision, Mission and Value are rather flowery, fluffy, flaky statements of little use, but they are denying themselves some important leverage points as the leader.

    The Vision is a call out to what is the purpose of what we are doing. This is a fundamental thing, but in many companies the staff have an unclear idea of the purpose. We can recall the classic building the wall metaphor. Three stonemasons are asked what they are doing, and the first says, “building this wall”. The second one says, “I am building a new faculty building for the university”. The third one says, “I am building a facility to better educate future generation”. The metaphor makes the point that the understanding of purpose is different, even though each person was laying stone blocks to build a wall. We need to make sure that our team is clear on what is the purpose of why we are putting in all these long, hard hours.

    The Mission is a clarification of what we do and, by definition, what we don’t do. Making the main thing the main thing sounds simple, but there are so many bright shiny objects and fashionable trends which can divert us. We need to make sure everyone understands what we need to concentrate on and not allow the business to be drawn off course.

    The Values are the glue which bind us together. The leader’s job is to find out the common values of the team which will correspond with the values of the organisation and have everyone flying together in tight formation going in the same direction. The other important point is to make sure that the organisation lives the values and that the team lives the values. When the organisation rhetoric strays from the stated values, the cynicism becomes a cancer which eats away at the morale and teamwork of the firm.

    Once we have set the guide rails, we can set the strategy to achieve the Vision. There will be a series of goals to be achieved to get us to where we want to be. Obviously, revenue and profit goals are going to be critical to the health and longevity of the firm. There will be quality considerations which relate to our brand and its positioning in the market. Cost of customer acquisition and the success of our marketing to help grow the business will bring their own sets of goals. Who we recruit and how we train them will have a major impact on the success of the company. Business is a one team against another team head-to-head struggle and the best team wins in the long term. Our sales team versus the opposition, our marketing prowess against that of so many rivals, our factory staff against the competition, our leadership bench strength against all comers in our industry sector.

    We need to measure our progress and success in attaining our goals. There are activities and outcomes which we need to track. We break these down for each financial year and for longer term considerations and they must add up to attaining the Vision we have set. They must be objective and correct numbers, because incorrect data can hurt us and cause us to make poor decisions. Getting correct data is not always that easy and we must have systems to keep checking that what we think is happening is actually the case.

    So think of this strategic plan as a funnel. The mouth of the funnel at the top is where we pour in the purpose, and gradually we keep refining the execution of the purpose by specifying more and more concrete details needed for its attainment.

    Más Menos
    10 m
  • 557 How Effective Is Your Team In Japan?
    May 1 2024
    As the boss, we are always super busy. We have the management of the team and the results to work on. Everything has to be progressing on cost, on time and on quality. At the same time, we are setting the strategy, the direction for the team, communicating that so that everyone understands, establishing the values, and we are coaching and building the team members. Phew, I get tired just thinking about all of those boss roles. It is rare though that we can take a breath and reflect on the effectiveness of the teamwork. When problems arise, we tend to work on those in isolation and never have a moment to see the team as a unit, as a whole. Here are three things to look at in your team and reflect on if you are happy with the effectiveness of the team. 1. Conflict In a Western context, we might think we need to have constructive conflict which will help us to make better choices? In Japan, disagreements are more likely to be ignored because if we surface them, we have to publicly deal with it and discretion is the better part of valor here. Nevertheless, we cannot leave things fester and as the boss, we need to take action and sort things out. However, the Western idea of getting the two people in the room and thrashing it out will never work here. You might force people to get together, but no one will say anything in that meeting. Conflict resolution is best done individually, privately, and quietly. We have to take an entirely different approach to sorting out conflict in Japan. We talk to each person many times and, like war time negotiators, we move them toward an armistice that can stick. Hostilities will cease and the conflict will become muted, although never forgotten. Japan is better at working together to come up with solutions when everyone is involved and has a sense of shared ownership. We should concentrate on creating these occasions and the idea of creative conflict becomes replaced with creative cooperation, which suits the Japanese psyche much better. 2. Cooperation In teams, there can be contradictions where it can be difficult to square the circle. Sales teams are being measured on sales results and the numbers tell everything. There can be an issue though, depending on how the salespeople are paid. If they are on salary and bonus, then there is a natural preclusion to cooperate. Japanese salespeople would love to have no individual responsibility. They always vote for salary and a group bonus, related to a group target. This is great for hiding and avoiding accountability and these are two aspects where the Japanese salesforce can operate at ninja levels of accomplishment. We don’t do this in our organisation because we know we will always underperform and no one will be accountable. We want individuals to have specified numbers against their targets and for them to be held responsible for hitting those numbers. As you might imagine, this is not a popular idea here. If they are on individual commissions with a base salary, then there is an inbuilt resistance to cooperating with anyone else. It becomes “everyone for themselves” very easily. This is where values and culture need to play their part and glue the unglueable together. The boss has to work hard at gluing the team together, even when there are these fundamental contradictions at play. It can be done, but it takes a lot of consistency, brand building and communication. 3. Communication Working from home during covid definitely impacted the communication levels in our organisation. We were all operating in our bunkers at home, and the level of clarity and common understanding went down in my observation. Introverts like me loved it. You didn’t have to see or talk to anyone. For the organisation, though, it was not good. We have returned to the office and when we have people chatting in the office, it shows that what was missing before has been reclaimed. Japanese culture is an impediment to clear communication. The language is highly circular, purposely vague, very cautious about what is being said and against declarative or strong statements. “Telling them how it is” just doesn’t fly here and people from overseas who do that are seen as children, unable to compose themselves properly. The nuances of the message are what we have to focus on in communication in Japan and we have to keep checking what we think we understand is being said. Does this suck up a lot of time – Yes. Is it going to change – No. So how did you go analysing your own organisation against these three items of conflict, cooperation and communication? Working on our businesses rather than just working in our businesses is always a struggle. We have to proactively make sure we step back from the fray and take a cold hard look at what is really going on from time to time.
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • 556 Defining the Team's Purpose In Japan
    Apr 24 2024

    Managers manage. That means they make sure everything runs on time, to cost and to quality. The leader does all of that, plus some additional important things. These include setting the strategic direction for the team and building the people’s capabilities. Part of the leader’s role is to unite everyone behind the direction they are setting for the team. There can be a lot of detail at the micro level about how to make the strategy a reality. One key component which needs to be set at the start is to re-clarify the purpose of the team. You would think that was pretty obvious. However, if the leader doesn’t work on defining it, there could be 10 people in the team and eleven different purposes.

    Here is a simple six-step guide to setting the purpose.

    1. What is meaningful about what your team does, from the perspective of the organisation as a whole (such as in relation to the stated purpose and vision)?

    The team operates within the framework of the firm, but the leader must break that down to the team level and create a local version which matches the team’s reality in the field. How does your team fit into the big picture? Which colleagues from other departments are key partners and where is the coordination most required? There is often a firm wide Vision Statement which can be a good starting point and the task is to take that and create your own local version for the team.

    2. What is meaningful about what your team does from the perspective of your clients?

    We know what we sell, but sometimes we forget what the client is buying. They are not always the same things. For example, we might think we are selling leadership training, but what the client is buying might be succession planning or greater productivity. It is always important that every person in the team has a clear understanding of the client's needs.

    Jan Carlzon’s book “Moment of Truth” was an excellent guide to the importance of making sure the entire series of contact points with the client were aligned and operating at the same quality levels. An example would be the person who answers the phone is pleasant and professional, but the person the client is then transferred to is rude or grumpy. The firm brand went from heavenly clouds to depths of hell in one second.

    3. How should your team members behave as they are delivering what matters?

    This comes back to what are the team and organisational values? The leader will always have a wide spread of values scattered across their team and their job is to unite everyone behind the core values of the team. The value set defines how everyone thinks about the clients and that, in turn, defines how they interact with the clients. There is also the issue of how the team members interact with each other? Is there a strong level of mutual respect or we are in a pit of vipers with corporate politics run amok?

    4. What are the expected results for the team and what are we doing when we are acting according to our purpose?

    We are establishing KPI, goals, targets etc., to make the outputs needed clear to everyone. Does each individual have a target or are there team based goals? In the latter case, do people within the team understand their role in delivering the team result?

    5. What actions do you, as the leader, need to do to help fulfill the purpose?

    Taking care of the logistics, resources, permissions, interdepartmental cooperation are common leader roles. There is also the key role of coach to the team members to bolster their motivation and skills. Often though, as busy, busy leaders, we transition from coach to mad pirate captain barking out orders and making people walk the plank if they don’t perform. We set the tone for the team and we set the role model of how we are going to operate in this team.

    6. Who do you need to be as a leader to fulfill the purpose (characteristics/ qualities?

    We should never forget that every single member of our team is a ninja level “boss watcher” and they are constantly scanning us for any signs of crumbling between what we say and what we do. We set the pace and the quality levels for the team. That means we have to be lifetime learners, very well organised and totally professional in our work. It also means we have to be calm in the midst of the raging storms which hit our team from time to time and be the rock around which everyone can shelter.

    Use these six prompts to create the purpose for your team, either for them or with them. I would recommend “with them”, because the team who designs the purpose together has the best levels of ownership of the outcomes and is more likely to execute well on what they have produced.

    Más Menos
    11 m
  • 555 What Is Different About Leading In Japan?
    Apr 17 2024
    There is a debate about whether Japan is any different from anywhere else when it comes to leading the team. Intellectually, I can appreciate there are many similarities because people are people, but I always feel there are important differences. One of the biggest differences is how people are trained to become leaders in Japan. I should really clarify that statement and say how they are not trained to become leaders. The main methodology for creating leaders in Japan is through On The Job Training (OJT). I can see there is a crisp logic to the idea of OJT back in the day, however it is now a flawed system in the modern world of Japan. In the West, leadership training is a given, because the value is recognised and so the investment is made to better educate the leadership cohorts through each generation. The first problem with Japan OJT is it presumes your boss knows about leading. There is very little formal leadership training going on in Japan. I don’t believe it just about investing the money. There is no great tradition here for corporate leadership training. Before we dive into this subject, I believe we should clarify what is a leader in Japan and what is a manager and what is different. Japan, in my observation, is full of managers, and there are few leaders. A manager runs the machine on budget, on quality, and on time. The leader does all of that and two very important additional tasks. The leader persuades the team that the direction they are advocating is the correct one and, secondly, they build up the capabilities of their staff through one-on-one coaching. By the way, barking out orders like a mad pirate captain doesn’t qualify as coaching. OJT probably made a lot of sense up until about fifty years ago, when it started to be disrupted by technology. By the 1980s, desktop computing became common in Japan and gradually the boss lost his (and they were mainly men) typist and had to start doing his own typing on the computer. The advent of email in the mid-1990s was the real death blow to the boss’s time management. Now the boss had become super busy and time availability for coaching staff became much diminished. What this means is that we have had been through multiple generations of staff mainly educated through OJT and who have been short-changed on the leadership modelling by their “manager” boss. Each corporate generation passes on how to be a manager to the next generation and unless there is some intervention through formal leadership training, there is no real progress. Of course, there will always be exceptions who prove the rule and some managers who make it out of that gravitational pull of OJT and become real leaders. This is the lightning strike theory of leadership development and isn’t a great proposition to ensure that the firm’s leadership bench is stacked with professionals. The key plank in leadership is no longer task experience. The old model was the boss had done all the tasks of their subordinates and knew their jobs inside out. Today, there is much more speciality and technology is making sure it isn’t experience alone which will carry the day for the boss. Many companies in Japan are moving away from the old model of age and stage and instead promoting people based on ability. Just rotating through various jobs in the machine won’t be enough anymore. Leaders have to become expert communicators and masters of environment building, such that individuals can motivate themselves. How many leaders receive any training to assist their communication and people skills? Very, very few and everyone else had to work it all out through trial and error. That hit and miss approach is very expensive. The younger staff want different things to their parents and the modern boss in Japan has to adjust. The bishibishi or super strict model of leadership is now cast out on to the rubbish tip of leadership history in Japan. Bosses still using this model will see their younger staff departing in droves. Already 30% are leaving after three to four years of employ and that number will only get worse as we run out of people to hire and the younger generation all become free agents. The younger generation wants a psychologically safe environment and a lot of personal encouragement by the boss. One of the greatest elements to gaining engagement from staff is that they feel the boss cares about them. The way they know that is through the boss’s communication skills. If you believe that given people are getting paid, they should be engaged, then there is bound to be a lack of the needed communication of “I care about you” going on. If you don’t have well-developed communication skills, then being the boss is only going to get harder and harder. How much communication training do bosses get? Very little and they certainly don’t get much value through OJT, because their own bosses were crap communicators, ...
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • Leadership Blind Spots
    Apr 10 2024
    Do leaders have to be perfect? It sounds ridiculous to expect that, because none of us are perfect. However, leaders often act like they are perfect. They assume the mantle of position power and shoot out orders and commands to those below them in the hierarchy. They derive the direction forward, make the tough calls and determine how things are to be done. There are always a number of alternative ways of doing things, but the leader says, “my way is correct, so get behind it”. Leaders start small with this idea and over the course of their career they keep adding more and more certainty to what they say is important, correct, valuable and needed to produce the best return on investment. With an army of sycophants in the workforce, the leader can begin to believe their own press. There is also the generational imperative of “this is correct because this was my experience”, even when the world has well and truly moved on beyond that experience. If you came back from World War Two as an officer, you saw a certain type of leadership being employed and the chances are that was why there were so many “command and control” leaders in the 1950s and 1960s. The Woodstock generation questioned what had been accepted logic and wanted a different boss-employee relationship, where those below had more input into the direction of the company. Technology breakthroughs made hard skill warriors the gurus of leadership. Steve Jobs abusing and belittling his engineers was accepted, because he was so smart. Technology has however democratized the workplace. The boss is no longer the only one with access to key information. Being smart and abusive isn’t acceptable anymore. The boss-employee relationship has changed. It is going to keep changing too, especially here in Japan where there are 1.5 jobs for every person working. Recruiting and retaining people becomes a key boss skill. The degree of engagement of the team makes a big difference in maintaining existing customer loyalty and the needed brand building to attract new customers. Social media will kill any organisation providing sub-standard service, because the damage travels far, wide and fast. The role of the boss has changed, but have the bosses kept up? Recent Dale Carnegie research on leaders found four blind spots, which were hindering leaders from fully engaging their teams. None of these were hard skill deficiencies. All four focused on people skills. Leaders must give their employees sincere praise and appreciation We just aren’t doing it enough. With the stripping out of layers in organisations, leaders are doing much bigger jobs with fewer team members. Time is short and coaching has been replaced by barking out commands. Work must get done fast because there is so much more coming behind it. We are all hurtling along at a rapid clip. The boss can forget that the team are people, emotional beings, not revenue producing machines. Interestingly, 76% of the research respondents said they would work harder if they received praise and appreciation from their boss. Take a reality check on yourself. How often to do you recognise your people and give them sincere praise? Leaders do well to admit when they are wrong The scramble up the greasy pole requires enormous self-belief and image building. Mistakes hinder rapid career climbs and have to be avoided. Often this is done by shifting the blame down to underlings. The credit for work well done, of course, flows up to the genius boss who hogs all the limelight. The team are not stupid. They see the selfishness and respond by being only partially engaged in their work. In 81% of the cases, the research found that bosses who can admit they made mistakes are more inspirational to their team members. Effective leaders truly listen, respect and value their employees’ opinions Who knows the most? Often the boss assumes that is them, because they have been anointed “boss”. They have more experience, better insights and a greater awareness of where the big picture is taking the firm. So why listen to subordinate’s mediocre and half baked ideas? Engaging people means helping them feel they are being listened to by their boss. Sadly, 51% of the survey respondents said their boss doesn’t really listen to them. Ask yourself, am I really focusing 100% of my attention on what my team are telling me or am I mentally multi-tasking and thinking about other things at the same time? Employees want leaders they can trust to be honest with themselves and others There are two elements to this – external and internal reliability. External reliability is the boss does what the boss says they will do. They “walk the talk”. In the survey, 70% said their boss couldn’t be depended upon to be honest and trustworthy when dealing with others. That is a pretty shocking result. The internal reliability focused on being consistent with your own core beliefs. Again, 70% said their boss fails in this regard – ...
    Más Menos
    13 m