💰 The Economics of Global Hiring: Staff Augmentation vs EOR 🌐🌎
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
This text examines the financial and operational differences between staff augmentation and the Employer of Record (EOR) model for international hiring. While staffing agencies act as high-cost middlemen by adding significant markups to employee salaries, an EOR provides a more transparent alternative by charging a flat service fee to handle legal and administrative tasks. By using an EOR, companies can hire talent directly and manage them personally, often resulting in substantial annual savings compared to traditional outsourcing. The source highlights that while agencies are useful for short-term needs, the EOR model offers better long-term value and fosters stronger relationships between employers and remote workers. Ultimately, platforms like Thriver CP represent a shift toward a more efficient global hiring market where businesses bypass unnecessary markups while maintaining legal compliance.
Jesus Romero | CEO - LinkedIn
Gama Rodriguez | CRO - LinkedIn
🌐 Website: https://thrivercp.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/thriver-cp/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thrivercp