Episodios

  • Mega Edition: The OIG Report Into The Death And Circumstances Of Epstein's Death (Part 2) (11/26/25)

    Mega Edition: The OIG Report Into The Death And Circumstances Of Epstein's Death (Part 2) (11/26/25)
    Nov 26 2025
    The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.


    Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)
    Más Menos
    44 m
  • Mega Edition: The OIG Report Into The Death And Circumstances Of Epstein's Death (Part 1) (11/26/25)

    Mega Edition: The OIG Report Into The Death And Circumstances Of Epstein's Death (Part 1) (11/26/25)
    Nov 26 2025
    The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report into Jeffrey Epstein’s death delivers a blistering indictment of systemic failures at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and his holding facility. It documents a litany of procedural violations: Epstein’s cellmate was removed and never replaced despite explicit policy, surveillance cameras in his unit were malfunctioning or not recording, and the staff responsible for required 30-minute checks on Epstein didn’t perform them. Instead, employees falsified records indicating those rounds were completed, and in reality Epstein was alone and unchecked for hours before his death. These aren’t isolated mistakes—they’re classic symptoms of institutional collapse and neglect at a time when every safeguard should have been activated.


    Beyond the immediate night of his death, the report underscores a deeper rot: long-standing staffing shortages, indifferent supervision, and a culture that tolerated policy breaches without accountability. The OIG identifies that the same deficiencies had been raised in prior reports about the BOP, yet were never effectively addressed. By allowing one of the most high-profile detainees in the nation to slip through the cracks under such glaring conditions, the BOP didn’t just fail Epstein—they failed the public trust and all the victims who sought justice.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)
    Más Menos
    32 m
  • Epstein's Favorite Banks Turned A Blind Eye To His Abuse According To Allegations

    Epstein's Favorite Banks Turned A Blind Eye To His Abuse According To Allegations
    Nov 26 2025
    Two women who say they were sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein have filed separate lawsuits against JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Deutsche Bank AG, alleging that the banks “turned a blind eye” to Epstein’s trafficking operations and actively facilitated his abuse of young women. The suits claim that the banks ignored red flags—such as large cash withdrawals, suspicious wire transfers, and accounts linked to women exploited by Epstein—and that they financially benefited from maintaining him as a client despite his criminal history.

    In the case against JPMorgan, the lawsuit points to senior executives and the bank’s wealth-management division, asserting they prioritized profit over basic due-diligence and knowingly kept Epstein on as a client after his 2008 Florida conviction. The suit against Deutsche Bank likewise claims the bank accepted Epstein in 2013 for business-generating opportunities despite internal warnings and an ongoing regulatory probe, alleging that he was able to channel millions through the bank for rent, tuition, legal-settlement payments, and travel involving recruitments of young women. Both suits seek unspecified damages and ask the court to certify class-action status, arguing the banks bear responsibility alongside Epstein’s direct actions.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    25 m
  • Rodney "LiL Rod" Jones And The Amended Diddy Complaint (Part 15)

    Rodney "LiL Rod" Jones And The Amended Diddy Complaint (Part 15)
    Nov 26 2025
    The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him. In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past. Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.


    In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.




    The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:
    1. Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.
    2. Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.
    3. Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.
    4. Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.
    RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.

    To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.




    In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.


    (commercial at 8:51)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    Más Menos
    19 m
  • Rodney "LiL Rod" Jones And The Amended Diddy Complaint (Part 14)

    Rodney "LiL Rod" Jones And The Amended Diddy Complaint (Part 14)
    Nov 26 2025
    The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him. In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past. Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.


    In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.




    The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:
    1. Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.
    2. Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.
    3. Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.
    4. Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.
    RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.

    To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.




    In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.


    (commercial at 8:51)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • Rodney "LiL Rod" Jones And The Amended Diddy Complaint (Part 13)

    Rodney "LiL Rod" Jones And The Amended Diddy Complaint (Part 13)
    Nov 25 2025
    The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him. In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past. Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.


    In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.




    The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:
    1. Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.
    2. Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.
    3. Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.
    4. Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.
    RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.

    To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.




    In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.


    (commercial at 8:51)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    Más Menos
    14 m
  • Congress Threatens The Clinton's With Contempt Charges Over The Epstein Subpoena (11/25/25)

    Congress Threatens The Clinton's With Contempt Charges Over The Epstein Subpoena (11/25/25)
    Nov 25 2025
    James Comer, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, issued a sharp warning to Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton that they must comply with in-person deposition subpoenas in the committee’s investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell—and not simply offer written statements. He emphasized that the Clintons’ personal relationships with Epstein and Maxwell are precisely the reason why in-person testimony is required, and that declining to appear would amount to defiance of a lawful subpoena.


    Comer made clear that if the Clintons fail to show up for their scheduled depositions (Bill on December 17 and Hillary on December 18), the committee will initiate contempt-of-Congress proceedings. Such a move could lead to criminal referrals and potential legal consequences, akin to previous contempt cases in Congress.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Bill and Hillary Clinton told to appear for depositions in Jeffrey Epstein probe | New York Post
    Más Menos
    15 m
  • Consequence Culture: The Reckoning Epstein’s Enablers Never Saw Coming (11/25/25)

    Consequence Culture: The Reckoning Epstein’s Enablers Never Saw Coming (11/25/25)
    Nov 25 2025
    People scrambling to defend Jeffrey Epstein’s enablers are acting like the public demanding accountability is some sort of pitchfork mob obsessed with cancel culture. They’re pretending that exposing the people who protected a serial predator is the same thing as ruining someone’s career over an old joke or a bad tweet. It’s a deliberate distortion—an attempt to blur the line between trivial social punishment and the long-overdue reckoning that comes when power is abused, evidence piles up, and silence is no longer an option. These defenders are confused—maybe intentionally—because they know admitting the truth means admitting years of complicity, negligence, and willful blindness.


    What’s happening now isn’t vindictive. It isn’t impulsive. It isn’t moral grandstanding. It’s consequence culture—the natural outcome when survivors fight for justice, evidence resurfaces, and institutions can no longer bury the truth under NDAs, sealed records, and PR cleanup squads. Consequences are not the same as cancellation. Consequences are what happen when people who held power used it to protect a predator, silence victims, and keep a criminal empire running. If you’re terrified that facing scrutiny equals cancellation, maybe that says more about what you’ve been hiding than anything else.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    15 m