The California Appellate Law Podcast

De: Tim Kowal & Jeff Lewis
  • Resumen

  • An appellate law podcast for trial lawyers. Appellate specialists Jeff Lewis and Tim Kowal discuss timely trial tips and the latest cases and news coming from the California Court of Appeal and California Supreme Court.
    © 2025 The California Appellate Law Podcast
    Más Menos
Episodios
  • The BigLaw EOs & Right to a Hearing
    May 7 2025

    Trump’s executive order targeting Perkins Coie gets bench-slapped. Jeff recites the decision’s paean to the plight of lawyers. Tim wonders if Big Law was really hanging by such a slender thread. But on the law, neither is surprised by the result in Perkins Coie v. DOJ.

    Also this week:

    • A motion to seal to protect privacy goes full Streisand Effect in Marin v. Rayant—filed, denied, appealed... and now, at the request of First Amendment scholar Eugene Volokh, a full published opinion.
    • In Chang v. Brooks, a man loses his Wyoming guns after heatedly accusing his California neighbor of killing his cat and then getting hit with a restraining order. His SLAPP motion? Denied—without a hearing needed. Held: You’re entitled to a hearing, but it would have made no difference. Jeff & Tim ask: if Abrego-Garcia were to get a hearing, would it make a difference?
    • A $10M harassment verdict is tossed after a trial judge goes off-script with bizarre commentary and irrelevant evidence in Odom v. LACCD.
    • Should courts require lawyers to swear they didn’t use AI? Jeff and Tim say: bad research predates robots.

    Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.

    Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.

    Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.

    Other items discussed in the episode:

    • You have a right to a hearing only if you have something worthwhile to say
    • http://socal-appellate.blogspot.com/2025/04/ai-for-appellate-motions-and-more.html
    • https://bsky.app/profile/rmfifthcircuit.bsky.social/post/3lmfmkodpks2z
    • https://bsky.app/profile/roland.cros.by/post/3lmjyk7wejc2o
    Más Menos
    38 m
  • Kidnapping, Pronouns & Dragons
    Apr 29 2025

    A civil litigant, hit with $200,000 sanctions for plotting the kidnapping and murder of the defendant, gets the sanctions reversed.

    Next week the California Supreme Court will hear oral argument on whether the state can mandate long-term care facility employees to use residents’ preferred pronouns. If this is consistent with the First Amendment, could conservative states mandate hospitals refer to fetuses as “unborn children”?

    The State Bar used AI to create bar exam questions.

    An attorney used a cartoon dragon watermark in his federal filing.

    And Jeff reports some tips from the recent San Francisco CLA/OCBA appellate conference.

    Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.

    Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.

    Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.

    Other items discussed in the episode:

    • Videos from this episode will be posted at Tim Kowal’s YouTube channel.
    Más Menos
    28 m
  • Wait, challenging a vaccine mandate is a SLAPP??
    Apr 16 2025

    Apple said no jab, no job. The actor sued. The Court of Appeal holds the jab policy is expressive conduct, and thus the suit was a SLAPP.

    Apple Studios dropped an actor from its Manhunt miniseries over a COVID vaccine mandate. The actor sued. Apple filed an anti-SLAPP motion—and won. Jeff and Tim break down Sexton v. Apple Studios and ask:

    • Is a vaccine mandate a creative decision?
    • Do logistical decisions become “expressive” just because they are part of making a film?
    • The court held that following “contemporary conventional wisdom” was reasonable, but what happens when that wisdom was arrived at suddenly in a matter of a few months—and then is abandoned just as suddenly?
    • And recall past “contemporary conventional wisdom” that is now abandoned: smoking was safe (even good for you!); thalidomide was good for pregnant women; Fen-Phen and Vioxx were promoted. Tim notes that much medical orthodoxy has a short shelf life and the law needs to allow room for individual choice. Jeff notes that in emergency situations the law needs to defer to coalescing expert opinion and best practices. We discuss, you decide.

    Also:

    • A pro se litigant tricks a New York court into letting his AI avatar argue for him. (Spoiler: it did not go well.)
    • Plus, updates on shadow docket misadventures and deportation do-overs.

    Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.

    Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.

    Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.

    Other items discussed in the episode:

    • Apple’s mandatory vaccine is “creative” expression—employee’s lawsuit held a SLAPP
    Más Menos
    34 m
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre The California Appellate Law Podcast

Calificaciones medias de los clientes
Total
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    1
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0
Ejecución
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    1
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0
Historia
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    1
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    0

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.

Ordenar por:
Filtrar por:
  • Total
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    5 out of 5 stars

Helpful and easily digestible discussions on Ca appellate cases

I am representing myself in the appellate court. Listening to this podcast has helped me understand the intricate aspects of appellate law needed before writing my brief. I am a healthcare provider but I thoroughly enjoy listening to Tim and Jeff discuss appellate opinions. (For the record, I prefer century schoolbook.)

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña