This episode explores a UK parliamentary debate on animal welfare in farming. Key themes include ending the use of cages and crates for farmed animals, like enriched cages for hens and farrowing crates for sows. Speakers highlight concerns about low-welfare imports undermining UK farmers and standards, calling for mandatory animal welfare labelling to inform consumers. The debate also touches on insufficient enforcement of current laws and the rise of intensive farming, including 'mega-farms'. The discussion emphasizes supporting farmers during the transition to higher welfare practices.

Key Takeaways:

• Millions of farmed animals in the UK endure confinement, pain, and neglect.
• A significant number of UK hens are still in "enriched cages" that restrict natural behaviours, and many sows are kept in farrowing crates where they cannot turn around.
• Prosecutions for animal welfare violations in farming are rare despite numerous breaches.
• There is concern that imports from countries with lower animal welfare standards disadvantage UK farmers and may not align with British values.
• Mandatory animal welfare labelling is proposed to help consumers make informed choices and support higher standards.
• The rise of intensive farming, including 'mega-farms', raises concerns about animal welfare, staffing ratios, and environmental impact.

Important Definitions and Concepts:

• Enriched Cages: Cages for laying hens, used by about 28% of the UK laying flock, which severely restrict natural behaviours. Also referred to as "confinement cages".
• Farrowing Crates: Small metal cages used on pig farms where sows are confined to give birth and nurse young, preventing them from turning around or expressing natural maternal behaviours.
• Mandatory Animal Welfare Labelling: A proposed scheme where labels on meat, eggs, and dairy would clearly communicate the welfare standards used in production, enabling consumers to make informed choices.

Source: Animal Welfare in Farming
Volume 768: debated on Tuesday 3 June 2025

Support the show

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes Mon-Thurs: thebenchreport.co.uk

Extended shownotes for selected episodes can be found at: thebenchreport.substack.com

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: thebenchreportuk@gmail.com

Follow us on YouTube, X, Bluesky, Facebook and Instagram @BenchReportUK

Support us for bonus episodes and more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.

Today we explore the role and limitations of the Groceries Code Adjudicator (GCA), which oversees fair trading between large UK supermarkets and their direct suppliers. Despite being intended to protect producers and consumers, many argue its remit is too narrow, covering only the largest retailers and often missing primary producers further down the chain. Suppliers fear retaliation if they complain. Proposals include widening the GCA's scope, reducing the turnover threshold for covered businesses, giving it more powers (like initiating inquiries and regulating prices), or creating a new regulator for the entire supply chain. The goal is to ensure fairness, support domestic producers, and enhance food security.

Key Takeaways:

• The Groceries Code Adjudicator (GCA) was established to ensure fair trading between large retailers and suppliers.
• It currently applies only to the largest grocery retailers (turnover over £1 billion).
• Many believe the GCA's powers and scope are too narrow and that it needs "more teeth".
• There are calls to extend the GCA's remit to include more retailers, food service providers, manufacturers, and even the ornamental sector.
• Producers and farmers often feel left out, as the code primarily covers direct suppliers to the large retailers.
• A significant fear of reprisal or being "blacklisted" prevents many suppliers and farmers from raising complaints.
• Some propose giving the GCA power over price floors and ceilings or initiating its own investigations.
• There is a call for a more holistic regulator that covers the entire food supply chain, from farm to shelf.

Important Definitions and Concepts:

• Groceries Code Adjudicator (GCA): A body set up to enforce the groceries supply code of practice, ensuring fair dealing between designated large retailers and their direct suppliers.
• Groceries Supply Code of Practice: The set of rules that designated grocery retailers must follow in their dealings with suppliers, which the GCA enforces.

Source: Groceries Code Adjudicator
Volume 768: debated on Tuesday 3 June 2025

Support the show

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes Mon-Thurs: thebenchreport.co.uk

Extended shownotes for selected episodes can be found at: thebenchreport.substack.com

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: thebenchreportuk@gmail.com

Follow us on YouTube, X, Bluesky, Facebook and Instagram @BenchReportUK

Support us for bonus episodes and more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.

Discover why local pubs are vital community hubs, providing jobs, supporting local businesses, and boosting social connection. Learn about the financial challenges pubs face, like rising costs and taxes, leading to many closures. This episode explores how communities are stepping up to save beloved pubs, often aiming for community ownership. We discuss past government support like the Community Ownership Fund and proposed new rights and funding streams to help preserve these important assets for the future.

Key Takeaways:

• Pubs are important community assets that contribute significantly to local economies and social cohesion.
• Rising costs, taxes, and changing consumer behavior are causing many pubs to close.
• Community ownership allows local people to buy and run pubs for community benefit, not just profit.
• The Community Ownership Fund previously helped groups buy assets, including pubs, but is no longer available.
• New government plans include a Community Right to Buy for assets like pubs and potential new funding or support through initiatives like the Plan for Neighbourhoods.

Important Definitions and Concepts:

• Community Pub: A pub run for the benefit of the local community, often reinvesting profits back into community initiatives.
• Community Ownership Fund: A past government fund that provided money to community groups to help them purchase important local assets, including pubs.
• Community Right to Buy: A proposed new legal power allowing local authorities to require landlords to rent out persistently vacant commercial units, potentially enabling communities to take them over.

Discussion: Considering the challenges pubs face and the potential for community ownership, how can communities and government work together effectively to save valued local pubs and ensure they thrive as community hubs in the future?

Source: Pubs and Community Funding
Volume 767: debated on Monday 19 May 2025

Support the show

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes Mon-Thurs: thebenchreport.co.uk

Extended shownotes for selected episodes can be found at: thebenchreport.substack.com

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: thebenchreportuk@gmail.com

Follow us on YouTube, X, Bluesky, Facebook and Instagram @BenchReportUK

Support us for bonus episodes and more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.

This episode explores the significant issue of banking fraud in the UK. We'll cover the two main types: unauthorised fraud, where criminals make payments without permission, and authorised push payment (APP) fraud, where victims are tricked into sending money themselves. Learn about the scale of losses – £1.2 billion stolen in 2023. We'll discuss how law enforcement and the government are working to tackle fraud, including criticisms of past efforts. Crucially, we examine the banking industry's role and recent changes like mandatory reimbursement for APP fraud victims.

Key Takeaways

• Criminals stole £1.2 billion through banking fraud and scams in 2023.
• Fraud accounted for over 40% of crimes against individuals in England and Wales in 2024.
• Unauthorised fraud involves payments made without the account holder's permission. Payment providers almost always reimburse victims.
• Authorised Push Payment (APP) fraud is where a victim is tricked into sending money.
• From October 2024, payment service providers are legally required to reimburse APP fraud victims up to £85,000, subject to conditions.
• The police response to fraud has been criticised, with a low percentage of reported cases leading to investigation.
• The government published a Fraud Strategy in 2023 aiming to stop fraud, pursue criminals, and help victims.
• Banking industry actions include the Banking Protocol scheme, sharing intelligence with police, and implementing Confirmation of Payee.

Important Definitions and Concepts

• Authorised Push Payment (APP) Fraud: Occurs when a victim is tricked into sending money directly from their account to an account controlled by a criminal.
• Action Fraud: The national reporting centre for fraud in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, which collects reports before they are analysed by the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB).

Source: Banking fraud
Research Briefing
19 May, 2025

Support the show

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes Mon-Thurs: thebenchreport.co.uk

Extended shownotes for selected episodes can be found at: thebenchreport.substack.com

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: thebenchreportuk@gmail.com

Follow us on YouTube, X, Bluesky, Facebook and Instagram @BenchReportUK

Support us for bonus episodes and more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.

UK MPs recently debated the future of public libraries, highlighting their vital role as community hubs providing books, digital access, study spaces, and support. Despite facing real-terms cuts since 2010, leading to closures and reduced hours, libraries continue to deliver immense educational, economic, and social value. Speakers stressed the need for better funding, improved national data collection, and implementing recommendations from the Sanderson review, such as a national strategy and increased recognition. The debate explored how libraries adapt through innovation, community involvement, and providing non-transactional safe spaces.

Key Takeaways:

• Public libraries are seen as essential community hubs offering diverse services beyond books.
• Libraries face significant challenges including funding cuts and closures since 2010.
• Local authorities have a statutory duty to provide a comprehensive library service, though the definition is vague.
• There is a strong call for a national strategy for libraries, supported by robust data collection.
• Libraries play a crucial role in supporting digital inclusion, tackling isolation, and promoting lifelong learning.

Important Definitions and Concepts:

• Statutory Duty: A legal requirement for local authorities in England and Wales to provide a comprehensive and efficient library service under the Public Libraries and Museums Act 1964.
• Sanderson Review: An independent review of public libraries in England commissioned by the government, which made several recommendations including a national data hub, national branding, and a Libraries Laureate.
• Community Hubs: Libraries are evolving beyond just borrowing books to offer diverse services like digital access, study spaces, community events, and support, acting as central points for local residents.

Discussion: Given the evolving role of libraries and funding pressures, what innovative approaches could ensure libraries remain vital and accessible resources for all community members in the future?

Source: Future of Public Libraries
Volume 767: debated on Wednesday 14 May 2025

Support the show

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes Mon-Thurs: thebenchreport.co.uk

Extended shownotes for selected episodes can be found at: thebenchreport.substack.com

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: thebenchreportuk@gmail.com

Follow us on YouTube, X, Bluesky, Facebook and Instagram @BenchReportUK

Support us for bonus episodes and more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.

Our fourth and final episode on local government discovers how local government in England is held accountable. Councils answer to both their local voters and the central government. They are financially independent with their own assets and ability to borrow. Central oversight comes through the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) and designated Accounting Officers, who are personally responsible for public funds. This system uses financial rules, audits, and transparency to ensure councils spend money prudently. The government can intervene if a council fails its Best Value duty.

Key Takeaways:

• English local authorities are accountable locally to voters and centrally to government departments like DLUHC.
• Councils are financially independent but must follow statutory financial codes and rules.
• Every council has an Accounting Officer personally accountable for public funds, often to Parliament.
• Central government collects various data to get assurance about local spending and services.
• Important financial rules include guidance on treasury management, investments, minimum revenue provision (MRP), and borrowing limits under the Prudential Code.
• Councils have a Best Value duty to continuously improve services efficiently.
• The government can legally intervene if a council is failing its Best Value duty.
• OFLOG was established to publish performance data but is being closed.

Important Definitions & Concepts:

• Accounting Officer: A senior official (often the Chief Executive) in a local authority personally accountable to Parliament (usually via the Public Accounts Committee) for the use of public funds.
• Best Value Duty: A legal requirement for principal local authorities in England to continuously improve how they perform their functions, considering economy, efficiency, and effectiveness.
• Prudential Code: A code that provides guidance on borrowing and managing capital finance for local authorities, including setting limits.

Source: Local government in England: structures
Research Briefing
Published Tuesday, 22 April, 2025

Support the show

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes Mon-Thurs: thebenchreport.co.uk

Extended shownotes for selected episodes can be found at: thebenchreport.substack.com

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: thebenchreportuk@gmail.com

Follow us on YouTube, X, Bluesky, Facebook and Instagram @BenchReportUK

Support us for bonus episodes and more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.

Understanding local council money in England is complex. Councils primarily get funds from four sources: Council Tax from residents, Business Rates from companies (partially retained locally), Central Government Grants, and Local Fees and Charges for services. Most of these funds aren't 'ring-fenced', giving councils spending flexibility. The Local Government Finance Settlement, decided annually by central government, determines grant levels and how business rates are shared. Councils are accountable to voters but can face government intervention for serious financial issues or failing their Best Value duty.

Key Takeaways:

• Local government finance in England is complex and distinct from other UK nations.
• Main funding comes from Council Tax, Business Rates, Central Government Grants, and Local Fees/Charges.
• Most funding isn't 'ring-fenced', offering councils spending flexibility.
• Council Tax levels are set locally but subject to government limits.
• Councils collect Business Rates, retaining 50% locally via a redistribution system.
• Central Government Grants include non-ring-fenced (like RSG) and specific grants.
• The Local Government Finance Settlement annually determines main grants and business rate distribution.
• Councils are accountable locally but face government intervention for failure or failing the Best Value duty.

Important Definitions & Concepts:

• Council Tax: A local tax on residential properties, set by councils based on property value bands determined by the VOA.
• Business Rates: A tax on non-domestic properties, collected by councils, with 50% kept locally via a redistribution system.

Discussion and Reflection Question: Considering the mix of local revenue sources and the annual nature of the main central government settlement, what are the potential challenges for councils in planning long-term finances and ensuring stable services for their communities?

Source: Local government in England: structures
Research Briefing
Published Tuesday, 22 April, 2025

Support the show

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes Mon-Thurs: thebenchreport.co.uk

Extended shownotes for selected episodes can be found at: thebenchreport.substack.com

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: thebenchreportuk@gmail.com

Follow us on YouTube, X, Bluesky, Facebook and Instagram @BenchReportUK

Support us for bonus episodes and more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.

Part 2 of how local government works in England, focusing on elections and the changing structure of councils. We'll explore the First Past the Post electoral system used in wards, how boundaries are set by the LGBCE, and different election cycles like electing "by thirds". Discover the ongoing trend towards creating unitary authorities and merging councils, aimed at larger administrative units. Learn about the voting process, historical turnout trends, and the procedures behind these significant structural and boundary changes.

Key Takeaways:

• Local elections in England typically use the First Past the Post system.
• Councils are divided into areas called wards, which elect councillors.
• The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) reviews and sets ward boundaries.
• Ward boundaries are reviewed based on factors like electoral inequality or lack of recent review.
• Some councils elect all councillors every four years, while others elect "by thirds" or "by halves".
• Voting is open to UK, Irish, Commonwealth, and EU citizens aged 18+ residing in the UK.
• Local election turnout is historically lower than general elections.
• There's a trend towards creating unitary authorities and merging councils for larger administrative units.
• Creating unitary authorities involves specific legal procedures and requires government and parliamentary approval.
• New unitary authorities are suggested to generally have a population of 500,000 or more.
• Minor boundary adjustments (PABRs) are also possible but have been rare.

Important Definitions & Concepts:

• Ward: An electoral area within a local authority that elects one or more councillors.
• First Past the Post: The electoral system where the candidate with the most votes in a ward wins. In multi-member wards, voters have multiple votes.
• Unitary Authority: A single local council responsible for all local government functions in its area, contrasting with a two-tier system.

Source: Local government in England: structures
Research Briefing
Published Tuesday, 22 April, 2025

Support the show

Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes Mon-Thurs: thebenchreport.co.uk

Extended shownotes for selected episodes can be found at: thebenchreport.substack.com

Shape our next episode! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!

Email us: thebenchreportuk@gmail.com

Follow us on YouTube, X, Bluesky, Facebook and Instagram @BenchReportUK

Support us for bonus episodes and more.

No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.

Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.