Many people feel overwhelmed or confused when reading the Writings of Ellen G. White and her role in the church. Some take every word as a rigid, timeless law, while others disregard the writings entirely because they seem "outdated" or even fraudulent. But what if there was a better way?

In this episode, we continue our examination of Walter Veith’s perspective on Bible versions. Our guest, Christian Cardona, will demonstrate how Veith fails to provide a proper analysis of the textual differences between the King James Version and other Bible translations. We will also discuss his misuse of the Textus Receptus and explore why his overall approach lacks scholarly strength.

Listen to our previous episodes in :

Youtube : https://youtu.be/eW7MBR_Ay6k

Spotify

Rumble

Walter Veith vs Bible Versions. Part 1https://youtu.be/kawD17-wW4I?si=mMGtVtOCnX-Warvk

introduction to Waler Veith: https://youtu.be/NzTiHuq9RVc?si=16ivOjzU-1NnbIsg

And much more on

Ellen G White:

*principles of interpretation : https://youtu.be/0nn2WPC6Ceg?si=gDRGIAn89Teq3dmy

Conrad Vine's beef with ADRA

https://youtu.be/7FSFkrh9mwg?si=ko6mXCkC889S6LeD

https://youtu.be/xg6i0sI8xDg?si=x-8JhPFuTusuiIvX

This episode delves deeper into the outlandish claims put forth by Walter Veith. The central focus is his opposition to modern Bible translations and his steadfast support for the King James Version (KJV), which is based on the Textus Receptus (TR). Veith's position elevates the Textus Receptus to the status of the "gold standard," essentially equating it with the inspired Word of God itself. This installment will initiate an exploration of the historical and theological origins of these claims.