The Adams Archive Podcast Por Austin Adams arte de portada

The Adams Archive

The Adams Archive

De: Austin Adams
Escúchala gratis

OFERTA POR TIEMPO LIMITADO. Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes. Obtén esta oferta.
Welcome to The Adams Archive, a podcast that goes beyond the surface level and dives deep into the heart of the issues that shape our world. Hosted by the captivating and insightful Austin Adams, this show is your gateway to a new way of thinking about politics, current events, philosophy, history, and even the most intriguing conspiracies. Through engaging interviews, sharp commentary, and thought-provoking analysis, The Adams Archive is your key to unlocking the hidden mysteries of our modern world. Whether you’re seeking to expand your knowledge, challenge your beliefs, or simply gain a fresh perspective, this podcast is the perfect tool to help you navigate the complex landscape of today’s society. So come along for the ride and join us on this journey of discovery. The Adams Archive is waiting for you.Austin Adams 2023 Ciencia Política Ciencias Sociales Política y Gobierno
Episodios
  • #117- Faith Under Fire: Michigan Church Shooting, Charlie Kirks Deadly Microphone & Jan 6th Operatives

    #117- Faith Under Fire: Michigan Church Shooting, Charlie Kirks Deadly Microphone & Jan 6th Operatives
    Sep 29 2025

    The Adams Archive is where pattern recognition meets receipts. Host Austin Adams digs into breaking stories, legacy narratives, and the edges where media, politics, and power collide—always separating what’s confirmed from what’s claimed and inviting you to think critically, not just consume headlines.

    Summary of this episode We open with the Michigan church shooting—a deadly attack allegedly involving a Marine veteran—and examine what’s known so far, what’s still unclear, and why multiple church attacks this year are raising questions about a broader pattern of anti-Christian violence. From there, we track a same-day second shooting tied to another Marine veteran and consider whether these are unrelated tragedies, media framing artifacts, or signals that demand deeper scrutiny.

    Next, we unpack the language war—how labels like “antisemitic” are used (and misused) online—while noting the relative silence around explicitly anti-Christian targeting. The goal isn’t to downplay real bigotry; it’s to interrogate consistency, data, and the incentives that shape which narratives dominate.

    We then pivot to the January 6 FBI presence discourse: informants, plainclothes/undercover distinctions, and why chain-of-command clarity matters. What’s documented? What’s alleged? Where do numbers come from, and what should honest accountability look like?

    On to Amelia Earhart declassification: interesting history, sure—but we contrast the political oxygen spent there with persistent public demand for fuller Epstein-related disclosures. Is this smart transparency, or a distraction from the files people actually want?

    Finally, we tackle the Charlie Kirk shooting theories head-on—second shooter angles, security-team speculation, and the viral lav-mic claim—carefully flagged as unverified. We talk through why these theories spread, what footage appears to show, what it doesn’t, and how to build a responsible framework for vetting evidence when emotions are high and facts are evolving.

    Key topics, in brief (with flow):

    • Michigan Church Shooting: What’s confirmed about the attacker, timeline, casualties, and motive gaps—plus how proximity to other church incidents intensifies the “pattern” debate.

    • Second Same-Day Shooting: Another Marine veteran, different setting; we compare profiles, timelines, and whether “coincidence vs. coordination” is even the right question.

    • Narrative Labels & Consistency: Dissecting “antisemitism” accusations alongside reported anti-Christian incidents; pushing for one standard of evidence and language.

    • January 6 & Federal Presence: Plainclothes vs. undercover vs. informants—why the definitions matter and what real transparency would require.

    • Declassifying Earhart vs. Epstein: The optics of unveiling historic mysteries while deferring the disclosures modern audiences prioritize.

    • Charlie Kirk Shooting Theories: A careful walk-through of circulating claims (second shooter, security team, lav-mic), how to weigh footage, and why “speculation” must stay labeled as such.

    CTA If you value evidence-first deep dives without the corporate script, subscribe on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, smash Subscribe on YouTube, and join the conversation on Substack and socials. Drop a 5-star review—it’s the single best way to help this show reach more people. And share this episode with one friend who’d appreciate a clear-eyed look at messy headlines.

    All the Links One tap to everything (podcast apps, YouTube, Substack, socials, merch): https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams
    Más Menos
    48 m
  • #116- Good vs Evil: Charlie Kirk’s assassination, comeback confessional, mission reboot

    #116- Good vs Evil: Charlie Kirk’s assassination, comeback confessional, mission reboot
    Sep 24 2025
    we unpack the Charlie Kirk assassination questions, sift media narratives vs. facts, confront the censorship creep dressed up as “hate speech”, and revisit the Epstein files as a litmus test for elite accountability. We also tackle geopolitical pressure points (including the Israel debate), analyze digital forensics around chats and “confessions,” reflect on memorial optics and power plays, and—most importantly—chart a path where faith becomes the compass for clearer thinking and better action. Where I’ve been, why I’m back. We open with a candid reset: how the mission blurred, why the mic went dark, and what brought it back. The answer is both personal and public—a resolve to tell the truth in a way your kids could replay someday and still find courage in. The assassination lens—questions that won’t die quietly. We examine the lone-gunman storyline, angle-of-shot disputes, timelines, and the now-infamous chat fragments. Not to force conclusions—but to keep the questions precise, persistent, and public. Media narratives vs. receipts. Next, we pressure-test official statements, “fact checks,” and neatly tied bows. If an explanation demands your blind trust, we’ll ask for the evidence—and show you where the holes still are. Free speech, relabeled. Then we move into the censorship fight: how “hate speech” framing is being used as a lever to silence inconvenient opinions, and what stress-tests (big and small) reveal about who holds the switch. Geopolitics, incentives, and the unmentionables. We engage the Israel debate and broader foreign-influence questions with sober skepticism and documented context—because real analysis follows incentives, not hashtags. Epstein as the honesty test. We revisit the files, the evasions, and the convenient amnesia. If leaders won’t tell the truth about this, why trust them on anything harder? Forensics & ellipses. We decode the chat logs and digital “confessions,” highlight linguistic oddities, and separate what’s provable from what’s theatrical—so speculation doesn’t drown the signal. Memorials, optics, and power. We assess the staging, speeches, and symbolism—not to snark, but to understand how grief, politics, and influence collide in public rituals. Faith as compass. Finally, we pivot from critique to construction: Scripture-anchored principles that make life better—and make activism braver, wiser, and harder to co-opt. That’s the new North Star. Call to Action If you believe truth still matters, subscribe now and turn on alerts. Watch full episodes on YouTube, get deeper dives on Substack, and follow along on social for clips, receipts, and live Q&As. Your listens, shares, and reviews keep this mission moving—thank you for riding with me. All the Links One tap to everything: https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams Support My Business: Https://roninbasics.com ----more---- Full Transcript  Adams archive. Hello, you beautiful people and welcome to the Adams Archive. My name is Austin Adams, and thank you so much for listening today. On today's episode, we're gonna talk about where the heck I've been for over a year, because this is my first podcast back and I cannot be more excited about it. So we'll talk about what happened that caused me to drop off the way I did off of social media, off of my podcast. Uh, it has to do with obviously some of the. Political situations that are happening, some of the infighting, kind of just finding my own way and my own mission again. And so I'll tell you all about that journey and actually how I was affected by Charlie Kirk, and he inspired me to grab the microphone back and begin to continue my journey of speaking out for that mission. So then we're gonna talk about all of the happenings with the Charlie Kirk assassination. Absolute tragedy. It has now been. 13 days, almost two weeks since the event happened. And we're gonna talk through all of it. We're gonna talk through Charlie Kirk's character. We're gonna talk through some of the learnings that I had from Charlie Kirk, and all of the clips that we've all been seeing over the last couple of weeks. Uh, we're gonna talk about, um. All of the questions that I have surrounding his assassination. 'cause I have a lot of them. I have gone through and had analyzed many of the previous, uh, assassinations that were super high profile and politically motivated in the past. And through that lens I have a lot of. Questions a lot of them. And so we'll walk through what all of those questions are. We'll walk through what the actual narrative that's being given to us by the government is we'll talk through what are those current plot holes, who is talking about them. And even more importantly, who's not talking about them. We will talk about, uh, and when I say that, I'm mostly sa saying, you know, cash Patel and the FBI and the, you know, the governmental agencies that are responsible for this. Although, I would say one thing we're ...
    Más Menos
    58 m
  • #115- Election 2024 Breaking Point: US Military Authorized to Kill Civilians — DHS's New Domestic Terrorism Warning

    #115- Election 2024 Breaking Point: US Military Authorized to Kill Civilians — DHS's New Domestic Terrorism Warning
    Oct 22 2024
    Roninbasics.com | Protect yourself from the harmful effects of modern technology. Welcome to The Adams Archive, where we uncover the hidden truths that shape the world you live in. Hosted by Austin Adams, this podcast digs into real government documents, directives, and secretive policies that influence your life in ways most people don't realize. From domestic surveillance to military power, we expose how these institutions quietly expand their control under the guise of "national security" and "public safety." Summary: At The Adams Archive, we break down complex issues and provide you with the facts that the mainstream avoids. Each episode analyzes real documents and events that expose how governments and corporations work behind the scenes to control narratives and limit your freedoms. With a focus on newly released government directives, we help you understand how these policies affect your everyday life—and what you can do to stay informed. Government Surveillance Explore how government surveillance, particularly through the Patriot Act, has expanded its reach to monitor average citizens. We break down how AI-driven technology and new legislative tactics allow institutions to categorize dissent as "extremism." Learn how speaking your mind could land you on a domestic watchlist. Election 2024: DOD Directive 5240.01 & DHS Homeland Threat Assessment This episode takes an alarming look at the DOD Directive 5240.01, which authorizes the US military to use lethal force on civilians during times of unrest. Alongside the DHS Homeland Threat Assessment 2025, we reveal how these new policies target domestic threats and set the stage for unprecedented government control as the 2024 election approaches. Weaponized Policies We expose how policies designed to protect have been twisted to suppress rights and civil liberties. Learn how new directives allow for military intervention during civil unrest, and how these powers could be used against citizens. This isn’t just about national security—it’s about control. Tech & Disinformation Discover how AI is used to manipulate information, control global narratives, and spread disinformation. Governments and corporations use these tools to shape public opinion and stifle dissent. We break down the role of emerging technologies in this dangerous new frontier. Call to Action: Don’t miss out—subscribe to The Adams Archive today to stay informed on the topics that really matter. Follow us on YouTube, Substack, and social media to dive deeper into each episode. Your support means everything—together, we can uncover the truth behind government policies and safeguard our freedoms. All the Links: Access all our platforms here: https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams ----more---- Full Transcription   All right, so if we go down to 3. 4e in this document, it talks about the use of deadly force. And it's essentially what you would expect. If there's an imminent danger, or if he or she is not for a moment pointing a weapon at a person, for example. So even if you're not pointing a weapon at them, he or she has a weapon within reach, or is running for cover carrying a weapon, they can shoot you. Civilians. So if you're, I don't know, open carrying, and they think that you pose any type of threat, they can just shoot you. Civilians, the military, during civil unrest, right? DoD recognizes and respects paramount value of all human life if less than valuable or less than deadly force can be reasonably expected to accomplish the same result without reasonably increasing the danger to armed DoD personnel. Deadly force is justified when there is a reasonable belief that the person, the subject of such force, poses an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm to a person Or under the circumstances described in the 3. 4e. So essentially what it's saying is any and all circumstances, if you have a weapon, if you're open carrying, which you have the right to do, or even if you're concealed carrying and somehow they know that you're holding that weapon or have that weapon in the vicinity of you, they could shoot you if they think that you pose any type of threat, you know, the laws that were designed to be weaponized against our enemies. is now being weaponized against us. So if we go to the document that I'm talking about now, right? So we have those two DoD directives. We understand that. But this is also something I want to point and draw your attention to is, and this is the last thing of this document, then we'll move to the actual National Terrorist Advisory document, which is the USD and I and S approval. So it says, so this is how they actually get the soldiers. This is the approval process. Um, if the requested personnel exceeds 20 people, then you have to But if it's less than 20 armed military soldiers authorized to use deadly force, you don't. You don't. Within the United States of America. Or, if the duration of...
    Más Menos
    59 m
Todas las estrellas
Más relevante
well written knows his stuff the different alternative view than everybody else is always giving

really good well written

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.