
Shaw v. Reno (1993) | Florida Civic Literacy Exam | FCLE | 60 Sec Review #fcle #civicstest
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
Acerca de esta escucha
Shaw v. Reno (1993) | Florida Civic Literacy Exam | FCLE | 60 Sec Review #fcle #civicstest
Summary
In this episode of the FCLE Seminar, host Mercedes Musto explores the landmark Supreme Court case Shaw vs. Reno, which addresses the complexities of redistricting, race, and the 14th Amendment. The discussion delves into the bizarre shapes of electoral districts in North Carolina and the implications of these shapes on racial representation and constitutional law. The Supreme Court's decision highlights the balance between increasing minority representation and the potential for racial gerrymandering, emphasizing the need for legitimate justifications in districting.
Visit the full Episode 39 for Chapters
00:00 Introduction to Shaw vs. Reno
01:14 Background of the Case
03:10 Supreme Court's Decision
05:00 Constitutional Implications and Takeaways
Keywords
Shaw vs. Reno, Supreme Court, 14th Amendment, gerrymandering, voting rights, North Carolina, electoral districts, race, representation, constitutional law