Episodios

  • Paradise in the New Testament: Heaven, Hades, and the Thief on the Cross
    Feb 23 2026
    “Paradise” is one of those Bible words that feels instantly comforting—until you slow down and ask, What exactly does it mean? Paradise in the New Testament appears only three times, and when you line those passages up, they raise a question many believers have wondered about: Where was Jesus between His death and resurrection? Table of contentsWhere “paradise” appears in the New TestamentParadise in 2 Corinthians 12:3 and the three heavens Paul describesParadise in Revelation 2:7 and the tree of lifeParadise in Luke 23:43 and the thief on the crossWhy this gets complicatedSheol and HadesTwo possibilities for Luke 23:43Possibility 1: Paradise refers to heaven (Jesus went spiritually, later bodily)Possibility 2: Paradise refers to the place of comfort within HadesBelievers were removed from Hades at Jesus’ ascensionWhen unbelievers leave HadesClosing encouragement Where “paradise” appears in the New Testament The word paradise occurs only three times in the New Testament: Luke 23:43 “Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise.” 2 Corinthians 12:3 And I know that this man was caught up into paradise—whether in the body or out of the body I do not know, God knows Revelation 2:7 He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To the one who conquers I will grant to eat of the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God.’ If those were the only details we had, we might assume “paradise” always means “heaven.” In fact, that’s exactly what the first two passages strongly suggest. Paradise in 2 Corinthians 12:3 and the three heavens Paul describes In 2 Corinthians 12, Paul describes a man (very likely speaking of himself) who was “caught up to the third heaven,” and then immediately says he was “caught up into paradise,” connecting the third heaven and paradise. In Scripture, “heaven” can be described in different ways: The first heaven: the atmosphere/sky (where clouds and rain are) The second heaven: outer space (sun, moon, stars) The third heaven: the place where God dwells So in 2 Corinthians 12, paradise is presented as up, above—where God dwells. Paradise in Revelation 2:7 and the tree of life The second occurrence is in Revelation 2:7, where Jesus promises the overcomer will eat from “the tree of life…in the paradise of God.” That matters because Revelation later places the tree of life in the eternal state—the new heavens and new earth (Revelation 22:1–2). So again, paradise is tied to God’s presence and eternal life. Paradise in Luke 23:43 and the thief on the cross The third occurrence is Luke 23:43 when Jesus addresses the repentant criminal. Based on 2 Corinthians and Revelation, it sounds like Jesus is saying, “Today you’ll be with Me in heaven.” But Jesus did not ascend to heaven until His ascension. Why this gets complicated After the resurrection, Mary Magdalene recognizes Jesus and reaches toward Him. Jesus says: John 20:17 — “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father…” In other words, after rising from the dead, Jesus could still say, “I have not yet ascended.” So how do we reconcile that with “today you will be with Me in paradise”? Another important statement from Jesus: Matthew 12:40 — “So will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.” Jesus was in Hades, not heaven, between His death and resurrection. Sheol and Hades A crucial foundation is understanding the biblical terms: Sheol is the Hebrew term. Hades is the Greek term. In this discussion, they refer to the same reality (the realm of the dead). Scripture depicts both righteous and unrighteous going to Sheol/Hades, because it is described as a temporary abode of the dead rather than the final destination of eternal reward or punishment Two possibilities for Luke 23:43 There are two main interpretive options for what Jesus meant... Possibility 1: Paradise refers to heaven (Jesus went spiritually, later bodily) In this view, “paradise” in Luke 23:43 still means heaven (consistent with 2 Corinthians and Revelation). Jesus’ body would remain in the tomb, but His spirit would go to the Father. A verse supporting this view: Luke 23:46 — “Father, into your hands I commit my spirit!” Under this interpretation, Luke 23:43, 2 Corinthians 12, and Revelation 2 all use “paradise” in the same way. Possibility 2: Paradise refers to the place of comfort within Hades Hades included two compartments in the New Testament era—one of comfort (associated with Abraham’s bosom) and one of torment—and the place of comfort could be called “paradise.” The weakness is that this makes “paradise” mean something different in Luke than in 2 Corinthians and Revelation Believers were removed from Hades at Jesus’ ascension What changed after Jesus’ work was completed: Ephesians 4:8 — “When He ascended on high He led a host of captives…” When Jesus ...
    Más Menos
    31 m
  • The Two Thieves on the Cross: Two Responses, One Savior
    Feb 16 2026
    The account of the two thieves on the cross is one of the clearest pictures in Scripture of how identical circumstances can produce opposite responses to Jesus. Side-by-side, they saw the same Savior, heard the same words, endured the same suffering, and faced the same urgency—yet one hardened his heart while the other repented and believed. Their final moments preach a timeless message: what ultimately separates people is not their situation, but their response to Christ. https://youtu.be/6MqIINxLMqA Table of contentsLesson 1: Jesus’ parables teach that identical circumstances can produce opposite responsesThe parable of the two buildersThe parable of the sowerThe parable of the two sonsThe parable of the ten virginsThe parable of the talents (and minas)The wedding feast, the two debtors, and moreLesson 2: The two criminals are a living illustration of Jesus’ parablesLesson 3: Each person is responsible for their response to ChristHe believes in life after deathHe believes Jesus has a kingdom beyond deathHe believes salvation is mercy, not meritHe believes Jesus will receive himJesus’ response: assurance, immediacy, and fellowshipCertaintyImmediacyPersonal fellowshipThe gospel in living colorThe “deathbed conversion” question—and Matthew 20Lesson 4: God’s grace to others can expose envy in our heartsDon’t presume on tomorrowConclusion Lesson 1: Jesus’ parables teach that identical circumstances can produce opposite responses Jesus regularly taught in a way that removes that excuse. He often described people who shared identical circumstances—and yet experienced opposite outcomes. Once you notice this pattern, you start seeing it everywhere in Jesus’ teaching. The parable of the two builders Both men heard the same teaching: “Everyone who hears these words of mine…” (Matthew 7:24) “Everyone who hears these words of mine…” (Matthew 7:26) Both men built a house. Both faced the same storm: “The rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house…” (Matthew 7:25) “The rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat against that house…” (Matthew 7:27) Same teaching. Same project. Same storm. Completely different results. The parable of the sower There is one Sower. The seed is good. The seed is distributed broadly. Same Sower. Same seed. Same method. Yet radically different responses. The parable of the two sons Same father. Same command: “Son, go and work in the vineyard today.” (Matthew 21:28) Completely different responses. The parable of the ten virgins Same wedding. Same role. Same expectation: wait for the bridegroom. But two very different endings. The parable of the talents (and minas) Same master. Same stewardship principle. Same assignment: be faithful with what you’ve been entrusted. But again: different responses—and different outcomes. The wedding feast, the two debtors, and more Same King. Same invitation. Same mercy. Same opportunity. Yet not everyone responds the same. And if we’ll allow Jesus’ parables to do their work, they press us toward a sobering conclusion: the decisive issue is not the sameness of circumstances, but the posture of the heart. That prepares us for what happens at the cross. Lesson 2: The two criminals are a living illustration of Jesus’ parables In recent sermons, we’ve been noticing living illustrations in Scripture: Barabbas as a living illustration of substitutionary atonement (Jesus takes the punishment another deserved). Simon of Cyrene is a living illustration of cross-bearing discipleship (he literally picks up the cross and follows). Now we come to another living illustration—one of the clearest in all the Gospels. The two criminals crucified next to Jesus face nearly identical circumstances, yet they respond in opposite ways. Here’s how similar their situations are: Same guilt and sentence: both are criminals being executed by Rome—publicly shamed and justly condemned. Same suffering and helplessness: neither can come down, fix their life, or perform works to “make up for it.” Same proximity to Jesus: both are close enough to see Him, hear Him, and observe His restraint and mercy. Same evidence: they watch the same mocking crowd, the same religious scorn, the same soldiers, the same injustice. Same limited time: there is no future. No long discipleship process. Eternity is immediate. Same social pressure: the whole atmosphere pushes them toward scoffing and unbelief. Same claims about Christ: they hear “He is the Christ,” and they see the inscription, “King of the Jews.” Same setting. Same opportunity. Same Savior. But two radically different responses. Lesson 3: Each person is responsible for their response to Christ Luke records the first man’s response: “One of the criminals who were hanged railed at him, saying, ‘Are you not the Christ? Save yourself and us!’” (Luke 23:39) His response is hardened unbelief: He blends in with the ...
    Más Menos
    44 m
  • “Save Yourself”: Jesus Mocked on the Cross, the Two Thieves, and the Kindness That Leads to Repentance (Luke 23:35–41)
    Feb 9 2026
    When we think of the crucifixion, we usually picture the physical suffering—nails, blood, scourging, and agony. But the Gospels repeatedly draw our attention to something else, too: the cruelty of words. Jesus didn’t only endure pain in His body; He endured humiliation, rejection, and hatred poured out through mockery. Even the old saying, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me,” collapses under the weight of Scripture. The Bible says words can cut like blades and burn like fire: Proverbs 12:18 says, “There is one whose rash words are like sword thrusts…” Psalm 57:4 describes enemies whose “tongues [are] sharp swords.” Psalm 64:3 says they “aim bitter words like arrows.” James 3:5–6 warns that the tongue can be like a fire that sets an entire forest ablaze. That’s why the insults hurled at Christ on the cross matter so much. They reveal what people wanted from Jesus—and what Jesus refused to do in order to save us. https://youtu.be/IMc48egK2pk Table of contentsJesus Mocked: “Save Yourself”Lesson One: Jesus Didn’t Save Himself So He Could Save UsLesson Two: Jesus Is God’s King, Not Man’sTwo Criminals, Two ResponsesLesson Three: Saving Faith Shows ItselfDid both thieves mock Jesus—or did one believe?Lesson Four: God’s Kindness Leads Us to RepentanceWhy God’s Kindness Produces RepentanceConclusion: Don’t Only Focus on Your Sin—Focus on Christ Jesus Mocked: “Save Yourself” Luke records a chilling scene: people watching, leaders scoffing, soldiers ridiculing, and one criminal joining the chorus. In verse 35, the rulers said, “He saved others; let him save himself.” In verse 37, the soldiers said, “If you are the King of the Jews, save yourself!” And in verse 39, one of the criminals even said: “Are you not the Christ? Save yourself and us!” The rulers said, “He saved others,” which is an unintended admission: they could not deny His miracles—healings, deliverance, even raising the dead. So they twisted the truth into a challenge: “If He has saving power, let Him use it on Himself.” The soldiers added their own mockery, offering sour wine not as mercy but as humiliation—dangling relief in front of a suffering Man they despised. And beneath all of it is a familiar temptation Jesus faced repeatedly: “Prove Yourself.” Matthew 12:38 — “Some of the scribes and Pharisees” (“Teacher, we wish to see a sign from you.”) Matthew 16:1 — “The Pharisees and Sadducees” (asked Him “to show them a sign from heaven.”) John 2:18 — “The Jews” (after the temple cleansing: “What sign do you show us…?”) John 6:30 — The crowd (after the feeding of the 5,000: “What sign do you do, that we may see and believe you?”) From the wilderness to His public ministry to the cross, the demand remained: “Show us. Prove it. Save Yourself.” Lesson One: Jesus Didn’t Save Himself So He Could Save Us Here is the heart of the passage: Jesus refused to save Himself because He came to save sinners. If Christ had stepped down from the cross, our debt would remain unpaid. On that cross, He was bearing wrath, accomplishing redemption, fulfilling prophecy, and completing the sacrifice. His staying was not weakness—it was obedience and love. Jesus could have ended it instantly. He could have silenced every mouth. But He stayed: to obey the Father to save those the Father had given Him And even the mockery itself fulfilled Scripture: In Isaiah 53:3–6 God says about His Son that He would be “despised and rejected.” In Psalm 22:7–8 Jesus says through David, “All who see me mock me; they make mouths at me; they wag their heads… ‘He trusts in the LORD; let Him deliver him.’” They mocked Him because they didn’t believe He was the Messiah—yet their very mockery unwittingly testified that He is. Lesson Two: Jesus Is God’s King, Not Man’s Luke includes another irony: Luke 23:38 There was also an inscription over him, “This is the King of the Jews.” In Roman crucifixion, the inscription announced the “crime” and warned the crowd: This is what happens when you defy Rome. It was meant to shame the victim and intimidate observers. But over Jesus, the sign that was meant as ridicule proclaimed the truth: “This is the King of the Jews.” Watch the flow: Leaders: “Save Yourself.” Soldiers: “If You are the King… save Yourself.” Then God’s providential declaration above His head: This is the King. All along, people staged a wicked parody of royalty—robe, crown, scepter, mock homage—yet none of it changed reality. The cross, in one sense, became His throne, because the King was accomplishing His victory through suffering. Two Criminals, Two Responses Luke shows two men suffering the same sentence, seeing the same Jesus, responding in opposite ways. Luke 23:39 One of the criminals who were hanged railed at him, saying, “Are you not the Christ? Save yourself and us!” 40...
    Más Menos
    55 m
  • Jesus’ Compassion on the Way to the Cross: “Father, Forgive Them” (Luke 23:27–34)
    Feb 2 2026
    Jesus’ compassion is never more stunning than when He is suffering. In Luke 23:27–34, on the way to the cross, Jesus speaks words we could never manufacture in our flesh: “Father, forgive them.” While the crowd mocked, while soldiers carried out their cruelty, while His strength was failing, our Savior’s heart was still turned outward—toward sinners. This passage shows us not only what Jesus endured, but what He desired: mercy for the very people who were putting Him to death. https://youtu.be/eTfFgscNmNY Table of contentsSuffering and self-focusLesson one: Even at the end of Jesus’ life, He remained compassionateLesson two: Suffering can reverse blessingsReversal #1: “Blessed are the barren…”Reversal #2: “Fall on us… cover us…”The proverb: Green wood and dry woodLesson three: Isaiah 53:12 fulfilled in Jesus’ crucifixionPart one: Jesus poured out His life for usPart two: Jesus was numbered with transgressorsPart three: Jesus interceded for transgressorsPart four: Jesus was our High Priest and sacrificeLesson four: Ignorance minimizes accountabilityWe are not ignorant, so we are accountable Suffering and self-focus I think suffering and concern for others are often inversely related: The less we suffer, the less we focus on ourselves, and the more we can focus on others. The more we suffer, the more we focus on ourselves, and the less we can focus on others. When pain is intense enough, it’s hard to speak graciously, hard to think straight, and hard to care about anyone else. We understand that. And because we understand it, we often make allowances for people who are suffering. That is what makes Jesus’ journey to the cross so surprising. If anyone ever had the “right” to be focused on Himself, it was Jesus. He had been falsely accused, beaten, and scourged. He was so exhausted and near death that the Romans compelled Simon of Cyrene to carry His cross. Yet even at the end of His life, Jesus was still concerned about others. Lesson one: Even at the end of Jesus’ life, He remained compassionate Luke writes: Luke 23:27 — A great multitude followed Him, including women mourning and lamenting. We don’t have to pin down exactly who these women were—faithful followers, outraged observers, or emotionally overwhelmed witnesses—because Luke emphasizes something more important: what Jesus said to them. Luke 23:28 — “Daughters of Jerusalem, do not weep for Me, but weep for yourselves and for your children.” The verse begins with a contrast (“but”). Jesus does not respond the way we would expect. We would expect Him to affirm their grief—after all, His suffering is undeserved. Instead, He redirects their weeping from Himself to the suffering that would come upon them and their children. Even in His lowest moment, Jesus is not self-absorbed. He is still compassionate. And Jesus' compassion includes a warning: He is referring to the coming destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70—something He had already foretold earlier in Luke: Luke 19:41–44 — Jesus weeps over Jerusalem and foretells its destruction. Luke 21:20–24 — Jesus describes the siege of Jerusalem that the people will experience and how terrible it will be for them. Lesson two: Suffering can reverse blessings Jesus describes a time of such horrific judgment that people will speak in shocking reversals. Reversal #1: “Blessed are the barren…” Luke 23:29 — “Blessed are the barren and the wombs that never bore and the breasts that never nursed!” That sounds almost unthinkable—because Scripture consistently presents children as blessings (Psalm 127:3–5, Exodus 23:26, Deuteronomy 7:14). And barrenness is often portrayed as grievous—sometimes even as judgment (Genesis 20:18, Hosea 9:14). So why would Jesus describe barrenness as “blessed”? Because intense suffering can invert what is normally good. In the siege and destruction of Jerusalem, pregnancy and parenthood would mean added vulnerability: more mouths to feed, more fear, more suffering to endure, more heartbreak to witness. Paul expressed a similar idea about marriage: marriage is a gift, but in extreme distress it can add weight to an already crushing situation: 1 Corinthians 7:26 I think that in view of the present distress (referring to the persecution the Corinthians were experiencing) it is good for a person to remain as he is. 27 Are you bound to a wife? Do not seek to be free. Are you free from a wife? Do not seek a wife. Reversal #2: “Fall on us… cover us…” Luke 23:30 — People will say to the mountains, “Fall on us,” and to the hills, “Cover us.” This language appears as a repeated pattern in Scripture—judgment so terrifying that death feels like an escape (Hosea 10:8, Revelation 6:16). When judgment is severe enough, people don’t ask for comfort—they ask for concealment. They don’t ask for relief—they beg to be crushed. That is the horror Jesus is warning about. The proverb: Green wood...
    Más Menos
    50 m
  • Simon of Cyrene: What It Means to Carry the Cross and Follow Jesus (Luke 23:26)
    Jan 27 2026
    When most people think about the crucifixion, they think about Jesus carrying His cross to Calvary. But in Luke 23:26, another man steps into the story—Simon of Cyrene. He didn’t volunteer. He wasn’t looking for attention. He was simply in the wrong place at the wrong time… or more accurately, the right place at the right time under God’s perfect providence. Simon was forced to carry the cross behind Jesus, and in doing so he became a powerful picture of discipleship. Jesus had already told His followers, “If anyone would come after Me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow Me” (Luke 9:23). Simon didn’t just hear those words—he lived them. His moment of suffering, inconvenience, and humiliation teaches us what it really means to follow Christ when obedience is costly. In this message, we’ll look at why Simon was chosen, what his cross-bearing reveals about Jesus, and how this brief encounter challenges every believer to embrace the path of self-denial, surrender, and faithful discipleship. https://youtu.be/u1sd0r_TnF0 Table of contentsWhy Following Jesus Is DifferentJesus’ Call: Deny Yourself and Carry the CrossLesson 1: We Choose to Follow ChristLesson 2: Christ Also Chooses UsSimon of Cyrene Carries the Cross Behind JesusWe Don’t Always Choose the Cross We CarryLesson 2: How We Carry Our Cross MattersFive Ways People Carry the Cross Well (or Poorly)1) Submission vs. Resistance2) Faith vs. Unbelief3) Humility vs. Pride4) Drawing Near vs. Pulling Away5) Obedience vs. ExcusesLesson 3: Carrying the Cross Is a PrivilegeConclusion: Look to Jesus Why Following Jesus Is Different Most people want the blessings of Christianity: Forgiveness of sins Eternal life Heaven Glorified bodies But when people learn that following Christ also involves self-denial and suffering, many decide they don’t want the cost. They want the crown—without the cross. And that’s why Jesus repeatedly gave strong, sobering words about discipleship. Jesus’ Call: Deny Yourself and Carry the Cross Jesus didn’t hide what it meant to follow Him: Luke 9:23 — “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me.” Luke 14:27 — “Whoever does not bear his own cross and come after me cannot be my disciple.” When crowds followed Him, Jesus didn’t try to entertain them. He challenged them—because He wanted true disciples, not casual spectators. Lesson 1: We Choose to Follow Christ In one sense, discipleship is a choice. Jesus says, “If anyone would come after Me…” That means we must respond. Following Christ means this: There is a cross for Jesus And there is a cross for every disciple If He suffered, we must be willing to suffer too A student is not above his teacher Jesus doesn’t promise comfort. He promises Himself—and He calls us to follow Him wherever that leads. Lesson 2: Christ Also Chooses Us Here’s what’s fascinating: while we must choose to follow Christ, Scripture also shows that Christ chooses His disciples. Think about the Twelve. They didn’t wake up one day and decide to become Jesus’ disciples. Jesus came to them. Matthew 4:19 — Jesus said to Peter and Andrew, “Follow Me.” Matthew 9:9 — Jesus said to Matthew, “Follow Me.” John 1:43 — Jesus found Philip and said, “Follow Me.” Luke 6:12–13 — Jesus prayed all night and then chose the twelve. John 15:16 — “You did not choose Me, but I chose you…” So do we choose to follow Jesus, or does Jesus choose us? Yes. God is sovereign, and we are responsible. We willingly follow Christ, yet we do so only because He first chose and called us. Simon of Cyrene Carries the Cross Behind Jesus Now we come to Simon. Luke 23:26 says: “As they led Him away, they seized one Simon of Cyrene… and laid on him the cross, to carry it behind Jesus.” Simon didn’t volunteer. He didn’t step forward to make a bold statement. He wasn’t trying to be heroic. He was seized. He was forced. He was drafted into a burden he never expected. Mark’s Gospel adds more detail: Simon was a “passerby” He was “coming in from the country” He was the father of Alexander and Rufus (Mark 15:21) Simon woke up expecting an ordinary day—but God had written him into the most extraordinary moment in human history. And that’s often how cross-bearing works. We Don’t Always Choose the Cross We Carry Simon pictures something important: discipleship often includes crosses we didn’t ask for. Many people think following Jesus means choosing a difficult life on purpose—like signing up for something painful. But often, discipleship looks like this: A burden is laid on your shoulders A trial shows up without warning You didn’t choose it But now you must carry it faithfully In other words, carrying the cross usually isn’t about choosing your suffering—it’s about accepting what God assigns and honoring Christ in it. Lesson 2: How We Carry Our Cross Matters ...
    Más Menos
    55 m
  • Crowds vs. Disciples: What It Really Means to Take Up Your Cross (Luke 9:23; 14:27; 23:26–27)
    Jan 13 2026
    Crowds vs disciples is one of the most important contrasts in the Gospels. Jesus drew people everywhere He went, and you can hardly read a chapter without seeing a “great crowd” or a “multitude” gathering around Him. Crowds look impressive. They can feel like spiritual momentum. But Scripture repeatedly shows something sobering: people can be close to Jesus physically while remaining far from Him spiritually. That’s why this sermon begins with two questions we need to keep in front of us: What’s the difference between being part of the crowd and being a disciple? What’s the difference between being near Jesus and belonging to Jesus? Jesus didn’t leave these questions up to our imagination. He defined discipleship clearly—and His definition is simple, shocking, and demanding. https://youtu.be/8Fc3Byw3WbA Table of contentsCrowds Are Common, Disciples Are RareJesus’ Shocking Definition of DiscipleshipWhy Jesus Thinned the CrowdsWhat the Cross Meant Then and What It Means NowCrucifixion Was About SubmissionScripture Gives Living Illustrations of God’s CommandsSimon of Cyrene: A Living Illustration of DiscipleshipDiscipleship Is Not a Spectator SportFinal Call: From the Crowd to Following Christ Crowds Are Common, Disciples Are Rare The Gospels contain a constant stream of crowds. That should not surprise us: Jesus healed the sick, cast out demons, taught with authority, confronted hypocrisy, and displayed power no one had ever seen. Wherever He went, people came. But the sobering reality is that crowds are not the same as disciples. Crowds can be curious without being committed. Crowds can be moved without being transformed. Crowds can be excited about what Jesus gives while resisting what Jesus demands. Crowds can be near Jesus and yet remain unchanged by Jesus. So the question in the Gospels is not whether Jesus can attract crowds—He can, and He did. The question is whether anyone in those crowds will become His disciple. Jesus’ Shocking Definition of Discipleship Jesus defined discipleship in a way that immediately separates spectators from followers. In Luke 9:23 Jesus said: “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me.” He spoke those words to His disciples so they would understand what it meant to truly follow Him. And the disciples’ own story proves how serious this is. Judas betrayed Jesus, and the other disciples abandoned Him in His darkest hour. Only John stayed near the cross. But after Pentecost, the Holy Spirit empowered them to do what they could not do in their own strength: follow Christ faithfully, even when it cost them. Discipleship is not merely believing facts about Jesus. It is following Jesus as Lord. Why Jesus Thinned the Crowds Luke 14:25 begins like this: “Now great crowds accompanied him…” If Jesus could miraculously feed massive crowds (and He did), then “great crowds” likely means thousands. Imagine what many popular religious leaders would do at that moment: “This is amazing—look how many people are following me.” “I need to keep them happy so they don’t leave.” “What can I say that will encourage them to stay?” But Jesus often did the opposite. When the crowds grew, He would say something that forced a decision. Think about John 6. After Jesus fed the 5,000, the crowd swelled. People wanted more miracles and more food. Jesus confronted them with the truth they did not want, and many left. And in Luke 14, Jesus does it again. He says: “If anyone comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children… yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple.”“Whoever does not bear his own cross and come after me cannot be my disciple.” Jesus wasn’t trying to build a fanbase. He was calling disciples. What the Cross Meant Then and What It Means Now Here is one of the biggest dangers for modern Christians: we are so familiar with the cross that we can miss how shocking Jesus’ words would have sounded. Today, crosses are often symbols of beauty, love, and comfort: crosses in churches crosses on jewelry crosses in logos and décor crosses hanging from rearview mirrors But in Jesus’ day, the cross was not inspirational—it was horrifying. It was a brutal instrument of suffering, shame, and public humiliation. It was Rome’s terror weapon. People did not decorate their homes with cross imagery any more than we would decorate our homes with an electric chair, a noose, or a guillotine. So when Jesus said, “Take up your cross,” He was not speaking in sentimental terms. He was describing a path of suffering, self-denial, and surrender. Crucifixion Was About Submission Rome could have executed people in many ways more quickly. They chose crucifixion for at least two reasons: the suffering it inflicted the submission it displayed And that second reason matters for understanding Jesus’ words. Rome didn’t just crucify people; they paraded ...
    Más Menos
    49 m
  • The Wrong Shepherd: Choosing Barabbas Over Jesus (Zechariah 11 & Luke 23)
    Jan 6 2026
    Have you ever wished you could rewind the final hours of Jesus’ life and watch them unfold from a different angle—almost like “behind-the-scenes” before the Gospels record it? Choosing Barabbas over Jesus is one of the most shocking moments in Scripture, and because we’ve heard it so many times, it can start to feel familiar. Most of us know the storyline. Judas betrays Jesus for thirty pieces of silver. The money ends up connected to a potter. Pilate tries to release Jesus. And the crowd stuns everyone by demanding Barabbas instead. But what if God had already given His people a prophetic preview of those very moments—not merely with a few scattered predictions, but through a living drama acted out in history? That’s what we find in Zechariah 11. Zechariah doesn’t only speak prophecy—he performs it. He steps into one role, then shifts and plays another. And in doing so, he portrays two shepherds: a true shepherd who is rejected, and a foolish shepherd who is embraced. In other words, Zechariah gives us the meaning beneath the event—while Luke shows us the event itself. Together, they expose the tragedy of choosing the wrong shepherd… and they also magnify the grace of the gospel. https://youtu.be/jv38x2g2lOU Table of contentsKey ScripturesZechariah 11 and the True Shepherd RejectedThirty pieces of silver: what God’s people thought their Shepherd was worthThrown into the temple: blood money returnedThe potter and the field: where rejected vessels end upJudas and the field: a horrifying picture of judgmentAn encouraging truth: the Potter remakes broken vesselsThe staff is broken: rejection brings judgmentThe foolish shepherd: the one the people wantLuke 23: Choosing the wrong shepherd in real timeBarabbas: the kind of man you don’t set freeThe shocking cry: “Release to us Barabbas!”The hypocrisy: accuse Jesus of rebellion, then choose a rebel“We have no king but Caesar”Why crucifixion?The gospel in one scene: we are BarabbasA warning: don’t enjoy the benefits while rejecting the SaviorWhat will you do with Jesus?Application questions (personal or group use) Key Scriptures Zechariah 11:12–17 Matthew 27:3–10 Acts 1:18–19 Luke 23:18–25 Jeremiah 18:1–6 Romans 9:20–21 Deuteronomy 21:23 Galatians 3:13 Zechariah 11 and the True Shepherd Rejected Zechariah 11 is startling because it reads like a summary of the final hours of Jesus’ life—centuries before they occurred. Thirty pieces of silver: what God’s people thought their Shepherd was worth In the acted drama, Zechariah plays the part of the shepherd and asks for wages, because shepherds deserve to be paid: Zechariah records, “Give me my wages… So they weighed out for my wages thirty pieces of silver.” That amount matters. Exodus tells us that thirty pieces of silver were the price paid for a slave killed by an ox—hardly a “generous” amount. In the drama, the payment is not a reward; it’s an insult. It’s the people’s way of saying, “This is what you’re worth to us.” And that is exactly what Judas’ betrayal price communicates: not only treachery, but contempt. Thrown into the temple: blood money returned Zechariah continues with another detail that feels almost too precise: The Lord tells Zechariah to throw the money into “the house of the LORD.” That is exactly what Judas later does. Overwhelmed with guilt, he returns the silver and throws it into the temple before going away and taking his own life. God is showing us that the betrayal was wicked—but it was not random. Even the “where” of the silver ends up under the sovereignty of God. The potter and the field: where rejected vessels end up Zechariah adds, “Throw it to the potter.” In Jesus’ day, Judas never met a potter. But the chief priests—refusing to put “blood money” into the treasury—use it to buy a potter’s field, turning it into a burial place. A potter’s field was associated with what was rejected—broken clay, discarded vessels, things that didn’t turn out as intended. The irony is staggering: the price paid for rejecting the Shepherd buys the very place where the rejected are collected. Judas and the field: a horrifying picture of judgment The New Testament describes Judas’ death in graphic terms: after hanging himself, he falls, and his body bursts open. It’s a dreadful image—yet it fits the theme of rejection and ruin. Judas is like a vessel marred beyond repair, thrown into the field of broken things. But that darkness sets the stage for something unexpectedly hopeful. An encouraging truth: the Potter remakes broken vessels Jeremiah 18 gives us a beautiful picture: God is the Potter, and we are the clay. When a vessel is marred, the potter doesn’t have to discard the clay—he can remake it. Paul carries that truth forward when he says the Potter has authority to shape vessels for honorable purposes. This is why the potter’s field detail is so striking: in a sense, Jesus ...
    Más Menos
    50 m
  • Jesus the Passover Lamb: Examined and Declared Innocent
    Dec 29 2025
    Jesus the Passover Lamb stands at the center of Holy Week. Imagine Jerusalem 2,000 years ago during Passover—the city packed with pilgrims, families rehearsing the Exodus story, and lambs being selected and examined for sacrifice. Into that deliverance-soaked week, Jesus arrives, and everything the first Passover foreshadowed begins to find its fulfillment in Him. And then—into that Passover-soaked city—Jesus arrives. To understand Luke’s account of Jesus standing before Pilate, we have to begin where the Bible begins: Jesus the Passover Lamb. Once we see Him that way, everything else becomes clearer and heavier with meaning. https://youtu.be/vdg-G3GEejo Table of contentsJesus Is the True and Greater Passover LambExodus 12 Preaches Christ Before Luke Ever DoesThe Lamb Had to Be Without BlemishNisan 10–14 Prefigures Holy WeekThe Blood Had to Be Applied PersonallyThe Lamb Was ConsumedPassover Was Deliverance—and Communion Is Our MemorialThe Passover Lamb’s Examination Prefigures Christ’s ExaminationThe Examination Intensifies in Luke 20Pilate Unknowingly Inspected the Lamb and Declared Him Innocent“I Will Therefore Punish and Release Him”: The Gospel in One Unjust SentenceConclusion: Are You Under the Blood? Jesus Is the True and Greater Passover Lamb When John the Baptist first identified Jesus publicly, he didn’t begin with titles like “King of Kings” or “Son of God.” He began with the sacrifice: John 1:29 — “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!” 1 Corinthians 5:7 — “Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed.” Revelation 5:6, 8, 12–13 — In the throne room of heaven, Jesus is repeatedly called the Lamb, and worship rises to Him because He was slain. Every Passover lamb that was ever sacrificed—millions across the centuries—was a shadow and type pointing forward to Christ. Exodus 12 Preaches Christ Before Luke Ever Does Before we return to Luke, Exodus 12 gives us the categories that make Holy Week and the cross come alive. The Lamb Had to Be Without Blemish Exodus 12:5 — “Your lamb shall be without blemish…” God required a spotless sacrifice. And although this reminds us God deserves our best, it more importantly reveals what God was willing to do for us: He gave His best—His Firstborn Son. Nisan 10–14 Prefigures Holy Week Exodus 12:3 — The lamb is selected on the 10th day. Exodus 12:6 — The lamb is killed on the 14th day. Those five days (Nisan 10–14) correspond to the final week of Jesus’ earthly life: Nisan 10 foreshadows Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem (the Triumphal Entry). Nisan 14 foreshadows the crucifixion. Just as the lamb lived with the family, Jesus lived in Jerusalem during those final days—present, seen, and examined. The Blood Had to Be Applied Personally Exodus 12:7 — Blood placed on the doorposts and lintel. It wasn’t enough for a lamb to die somewhere in Egypt. The lamb's blood had to be applied to that house. In the same way, it isn’t enough to know Jesus died on a cross. His blood must be personally applied through repentance and faith. The Lamb Was Consumed Exodus 12:8 — They ate the lamb. John 6:53 — Jesus speaks of eating His flesh and drinking His blood (receiving Him by faith). Passover Was Deliverance—and Communion Is Our Memorial Passover remembered deliverance from Egypt. God repeatedly told Israel not to forget that redemption. Exodus 12:14 — “This day shall be for you a memorial day…” 1 Corinthians 11:23–25 — Communion is the memorial of our greater deliverance in Christ. The Passover Lamb’s Examination Prefigures Christ’s Examination Here’s a sobering thought: if you were a Hebrew in Egypt and the only thing keeping the Destroyer out of your home was the blood of a spotless lamb, how carefully would you examine that lamb? You would scrutinize it relentlessly. And that is exactly what happened to Jesus after He entered Jerusalem. He was examined by the chief priests, scribes, elders, Pharisees, Sadducees—and then by Roman authorities. The Examination Intensifies in Luke 20 Luke 20:1–2 — “By what authority do you do these things?” Luke 20:21–22 — “Is it lawful for us to give tribute to Caesar, or not?” Luke 20:33 — A trap question about the resurrection. They tried again and again—and failed. Eventually, the leaders stopped trying to trap Him and moved to arrest and kill Him. The questions turned into trials—more intense examinations. Pilate Unknowingly Inspected the Lamb and Declared Him Innocent Luke brings us to the climactic public inspection: Luke 23:13 — Pilate gathers the chief priests, rulers, and the people—this is public, formal, judicial. Luke 23:14 — “After examining him… I did not find this man guilty of any of your charges…” Luke 23:15 — “Neither did Herod… Look, nothing deserving death has been done by him.” In other words: the Lamb is inspected, and even hostile authorities can’t find...
    Más Menos
    47 m