
Psychological Report Writing in the Age of AI: Human Judgment vs. Machine Speed with Dr. Adam Lockwood
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Solo puedes tener X títulos en el carrito para realizar el pago.
Add to Cart failed.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Por favor intenta de nuevo
Error al seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
What happens when AI can write a psychological report in under two minutes — and licensed psychologists take hours? In this episode of Beyond the Couch: AI in Psychology, Dr. Ernest Wayde talks with Dr. Adam Lockwood about the disruptive role of AI in psychological report writing.
They explore how AI compares to human-written reports, where clinicians see value and risks, and what this means for the future of psychology.
Key Takeaways:
- AI-generated reports can match human quality in many areas — and sometimes surpass them in recommendations.
- Clinicians still prefer human summaries, but effect size differences were often small.
- Automation bias and loss of clinical skills remain real risks if AI is used uncritically.
- Bias in AI output reflects societal inequities, making vigilance essential.
- Responsible adoption requires safeguards like HIPAA-compliant agreements and human oversight.
For more of Dr. Lockwood’s insights and commentary on emerging AI research in psychology, visit his blog at LockwoodConsulting.net
Todavía no hay opiniones