Episodios

  • Episode 27: The Hidden Costs of Pretrial Detention

    Episode 27: The Hidden Costs of Pretrial Detention
    Dec 16 2025
    In this Student Voices episode, HLS J.D. candidate Leann Poarch discusses the significant costs of detaining individuals who await trial, such as legal fees, loss of employment, and long-term economic and psychological effects. Given that detaining individuals not yet convicted can cost local governments more than $13 billion, is it time to look into reforming the pretrial system?
    Más Menos
    26 m
  • Episode 26: When is Informed Consent Unnecessary?

    Episode 26: When is Informed Consent Unnecessary?
    Dec 9 2025
    Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School

    In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the fourth in a series on Ethics in the Law, host Jim Greiner talks again with IRB expert Shannon Sewards to discuss the complexities and criteria involved in obtaining waivers of informed consent within the realm of social science and legal research, comparing it to the regulations governing medical research. The two dive into an A2J Lab study on pretrial risk assessment tools to use as an example in determining the necessity of obtaining informed consent. When does protecting study participants take precedence, and when do critical research needs supersede those of participants?

    Read the corresponding blog post.

    Speakers:

    • Shannon Sewards, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB
    • Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School

    Resources mentioned:

    • General Requirements for Informed Consent (45 C.F.R § 46.116)
    • General Waiver or Alteration of Consent (45 C.F.R § 46.116(f)
    • Office of Human Research Protection
    • Common Rule (45 C.F.R § 46(a)

    Related “Ethics in the Law” series episodes:

    • Episode 8: Ethics in Research — IRBs and the Common Rule Explained
    • Episode 10: What is Human Subjects Research in Law?
    • Episode 14: Ethical Conundrums in Legal Research

    Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu

    Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:

    • Email newsletter
    • Facebook
    • BlueSky
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube

    Support the A2J

    Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
    Más Menos
    1 h y 3 m
  • Episode 25: Legal Labyrinths Reveal Divorce Filing Woes

    Episode 25: Legal Labyrinths Reveal Divorce Filing Woes
    Dec 2 2025
    Why is it so hard logistically to file for divorce when legally some cases are quite simple and uncomplicated? This second divorce study episode of Proof Over Precedent dives into the data behind the hassle factors and shares the surprising results of measuring the pro se accessibility of a court system. Maybe the answer isn't more lawyers.
    Más Menos
    58 m
  • Episode 24: Till Death—or an Affordable Divorce—Do Us Part

    Episode 24: Till Death—or an Affordable Divorce—Do Us Part
    Dec 2 2025
    When it comes to obtaining a divorce, pro se litigants face significant obstacles, stemming primarily from financial challenges. Without a lawyer, many are ill equipped to undertake the complex paperwork, waiting periods, and logistical hurdles that come with filing for divorce. This first of two divorce study episodes of Proof Over Precedent introduces the randomized controlled trial the A2J Lab undertook to determine how effective pro bono matching services are in providing access to justice for low-income individuals.
    Más Menos
    47 m
  • Episode 23: Innovative Approaches to Mental Health Hearings

    Episode 23: Innovative Approaches to Mental Health Hearings
    Nov 18 2025
    Rogers hearings allow Massachusetts judges to approve treatment plans for involuntarily committed individuals, but the process is criticized for its inefficiency and 99% approval rate. What if procedural reforms could improve outcomes? Replacing district court judges with administrative law judges to oversee hearings and substituting public defenders with mental health professionals as patient advocates could improve outcomes for both the involuntarily committed individuals and the courts—reducing delays, improving patient outcomes, and better utilizing court resources. All we need is an RCT.
    Más Menos
    30 m
  • Episode 22: Exploring Involuntary Commitment and Legal Reforms

    Episode 22: Exploring Involuntary Commitment and Legal Reforms
    Nov 11 2025
    In this "Student Voices" episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS student Aarushi Solanki discusses involuntary commitment laws for psychiatric patients in Massachusetts, where the process of holding separate commitment and treatment hearings winds up denying patients access to timely treatment.
    Más Menos
    22 m
  • Episode 21: What is the Impact of Legal Counsel at First Hearings?

    Episode 21: What is the Impact of Legal Counsel at First Hearings?
    Nov 3 2025
    Can the presence of legal counsel at a criminal justice defendant's first court hearing transform their journey through the justice system? Two Texas counties examined this possibility in a now-completed A2J Lab study. Project researchers discuss the results in this Proof Over Precedent episode.
    Más Menos
    1 h y 7 m
  • Episode 20: Caught in the Web -- Government Websites and Accessibility

    Episode 20: Caught in the Web -- Government Websites and Accessibility
    Oct 27 2025
    Access to justice via government websites should mean ease of digital access to information. In this Student Voices episode of Proof Over Precedent, J.D. candidate Spencer Thieme argues for simple and inexpensive upgrades to state and federal government websites to improve accessibility for the nonlawyers and non-government workers.
    Más Menos
    14 m