@Phil | SCOTUS releases The Immuntiy Decision: What it means and implications
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Solo puedes tener X títulos en el carrito para realizar el pago.
Add to Cart failed.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Por favor intenta de nuevo
Error al seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
@Phil | SCOTUS releases The Immuntiy Decision: What it means and implications
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
"That's because the vice president frequently serves as one of the president's closest advisors. So these private conversations would not be able to be used as evidence. Now, some people are remarking back to the Nixon tapes, and if the Nixon, if that whole Watergate system thing happened again tomorrow, those tapes would not be able to be admissible into the court as evidence. And then there was one more caveat to this, and Justice Roberts wrote that quote."
Todavía no hay opiniones