• Opinion Summary: Cunningham v. Cornell University | Opinion Date: 4/17/25 | Case No. 23-1007

  • Apr 17 2025
  • Duración: 11 m
  • Podcast

Opinion Summary: Cunningham v. Cornell University | Opinion Date: 4/17/25 | Case No. 23-1007

  • Resumen

  • The question presented is: Whether a plaintiff can state a claim by alleging that a plan fiduciary engaged in a transaction constituting a furnishing of goods, services, or facilities between the plan and a party in interest, as proscribed by 29 U.S.C. § 1106(a)(1)(C), or whether a plaintiff must plead and prove additional elements and facts not contained in the provision's text.

    The Supreme Court held: To state a claim under §1106(a)(1)(C), a plaintiff need only plausi­bly allege the elements contained in that provision itself, without ad­dressing potential §1108 exemptions.

    Más Menos
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre Opinion Summary: Cunningham v. Cornell University | Opinion Date: 4/17/25 | Case No. 23-1007

Calificaciones medias de los clientes

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.