Opening Arguments Podcast Por Opening Arguments Media LLC arte de portada

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments

De: Opening Arguments Media LLC
Escúchala gratis

The podcast that breaks down the law about all the stories in the news that you care about. Ciencia Política Política y Gobierno
Episodios
  • Do You Swear You're Not A Subversive Person?
    Sep 8 2025

    Continuing their "Good Law" series, Matt and Jenessa talk about Baggett v. Bullitt. This case held that "a State cannot require an employee to take an unduly vague oath containing a promise of future conduct at the risk of prosecution for perjury or loss of employment, particularly where the exercise of First Amendment freedoms may thereby be deterred." Jenessa gives a fascinating science breakdown on cognitive dissonance and what the effect of these vague oaths actually is. It's counter-intuitive and very interesting!

    Más Menos
    55 m
  • BREAKING: Federal Courts Correctly Notice Color of Sky, Pope’s Religious Affiliation
    Sep 5 2025

    For this week’s Rapid Response Friday we take up three major judicial rulings pushing back against executive overreach on three completely different topics: removals under the Alien Enemies Act, the use of the National Guard to conduct domestic law enforcement, and the imposition of tariffs as an executive action under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Also: it turns out a DC grand jury really can't indict a ham sandwich, and why Brazil is so much better at prosecuting insurrectionists than the US is.

    1. Fifth Circuit's decision in W.M.M. et al (9/2/25)

    2. Judge Charles Breyer’s decision in Newson v. Trump (9/2/25)

    3. Federal Circuit’s decision in V.O.S. Selections v. Trump (8/29/25)

    Más Menos
    1 h y 2 m
  • Douchebag Ben Shapiro knock-offs keep thinking they're smarter than Ketanji Brown Jackson
    Sep 3 2025

    VR6 - For today’s Vapid Response Wednesday, Thomas, Lydia, and Matt review two examples from a newly-popular genre of lazy right wing op-eds: insecure white guys complaining about Supreme Court justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. What is with these losers who are so obsessed with trying to prove that one of the most qualified nominees to the high court in our lifetimes isn’t fit for the job? We take dark-money sugar baby Josh Hammer up on the joke to compare his life achievements to someone who began her SCOTUS career with four times as much courtroom experience as John Roberts, Elena Kagan, Clarence Thomas, and Amy Coney Barrett combined--before moving on to trying to even understand what Federalist weirdo Shawn Fleetwood thinks he is saying.

    1. “Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is an Insult to the Supreme Court,” Josh Hammer, Newsweek (7/1/2025)

    2. “KBJ Could Learn a Few Lessons in ‘Professionalism’ From Justice Barrett,” Shawn Fleetwood, The Federalist (8/20/2025)

    3. Ketanji Brown Jackson’s career timeline from the Southern Poverty Law Center (4/7/22)

    Watch on YouTube!

    Más Menos
    1 h y 12 m
Todas las estrellas
Más relevante  
I ANAL but I’m interested in the deliberations, however I’m lost much of the time.

They do a great job getting across what is happening in court.

Great help in understanding

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.