Off Air with Ron Chapman Podcast Por Ronald Chapman II Esq. arte de portada

Off Air with Ron Chapman

Off Air with Ron Chapman

De: Ronald Chapman II Esq.
Escúchala gratis

OFERTA POR TIEMPO LIMITADO | Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes

$14.95/mes despues- se aplican términos.

Off Air explores the nations legal headlines deeper than the mainstream media.


Off Air is hosted by TV news analyst Ron Chapman. Neil Cavuto called him “Attorney extraordinaire” and he was labeled “ one of the best attorneys I’ve seen in my 20 years on the bench” by federal judge.


With over 175 acquitted counts in federal cases Ron has one of the most prominent trial track records in the nation. He brings real world insights to dive deep into the cases you care about.

© 2025 Off Air with Ron Chapman
Biografías y Memorias Ciencia Política Crímenes Reales Política y Gobierno
Episodios
  • Ilhan Omar, Tim Walz, and the Terrorism Connection in The Minnesota Fraud Case
    Jan 5 2026

    Send us a text

    You work hard, pay taxes, and play by the rules, so why is your money funding fake daycare centers and maybe even terrorism?

    In this episode, I’m scrutinizing one of the biggest fraud scandals in America, happening right under our noses in Minnesota.

    Billions of your tax dollars are vanishing into programs that were supposed to help people, and instead, they’re being exploited by politically connected fraudsters.

    I’ll dig into the numbers, the cases, and the names, including Representative Ilhan Omar and Governor Tim Walz.

    I spent hundreds of hours combing through filings and reports, and what I found will make your jaw drop. Funding might be making its way into the hands of terrorist-linked groups.

    This is the episode you can’t afford to miss.

    Key Takeaways

    Introduction (00:00)

    Feeding Our Future and MDE audit failures (03:36)

    Housing Stabilization Services fraud details (08:48)

    Fraud tourism and inflated billing (10:09)

    Viral video narrative examined (14:25)

    Ilhan Omar censure attempt and vote fallout (18:11)

    Tim Walz's framing of fraud scrutiny as racism (24:34)

    Additional Resources

    📖 Read Ron’s book Truth and Persuasion in a Digital Revolution

    https://a.co/d/2GxCpsZ

    ✍️ Subscribe to Ron’s Substack for deeper investigations: https://ronaldwchapman.substack.com/

    💡 Free sample of Truth and Persuasion here:https://ronaldwchapman.substack.com/p/truth-and-persuasion-free-sample?r=5ojo21&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true

    📲 Follow Ron on social:

    Twitter:@RonChapmanAtty

    Instagram: @ronchapman

    👍 If you found this breakdown insightful, like the video, share it, and subscribe for real legal commentary grounded in experience.

    🔔 Hit the bell so you never miss an ‘Off Air’ episode.



    Más Menos
    36 m
  • 3 Reasons and 80,000 Lives to Justify a Military Strike on Venezuela
    Dec 26 2025

    Send us a text

    If a foreign enemy killed 80,000 Americans, we’d call it war. But when those deaths come from overdose? We call it crime.

    In this episode, I will lay out the shocking reality of how state-sponsored drug networks are waging war on the U.S and Venezuela is at the heart of it.

    I will explain how the U.S. is legally reframing these cartels as terrorist threats and what that means for our national defense.

    You’ll walk away with a new understanding of how international law, U.S. drug policy, and military strategy intersect.

    Listen to the full episode now and find out the legal justification for targeting Venezuela.

    Key Takeaways

    Introduction (00:00)

    Legal and strategic justifications for targeting Venezuela (01:35)

    International law and the concept of armed attack (04:47)

    Role of Congress and legal authorization (13:34)

    The moral and strategic case for targeting Venezuela (16:40)

    The impact of US actions on global drug trafficking (18:46)

    Future of US-Venezuela relations and military interventions (24:37)

    Additional Resources

    📖 Read Ron’s book Truth and Persuasion in a Digital Revolution

    https://a.co/d/2GxCpsZ

    ✍️ Subscribe to Ron’s Substack for deeper investigations: https://ronaldwchapman.substack.com/

    💡 Free sample of Truth and Persuasion here:https://ronaldwchapman.substack.com/p/truth-and-persuasion-free-sample?r=5ojo21&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true

    📲 Follow Ron on social:

    Twitter:@RonChapmanAtty

    Instagram: @ronchapman

    👍 If you found this breakdown insightful, share it, and subscribe for real legal commentary grounded in experience.

    Más Menos
    25 m
  • The FBI's Role in January 6th: Were Sources Behind the Chaos?
    Dec 12 2025

    Send us a text

    They instigated the January 6 events and lied about it. This isn’t some tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory. This is a documented fact.

    In this episode of ‘Off Air’, I lay out the truth the media doesn’t want you to hear.

    The FBI had 26 confidential informants in the crowd at the Capitol on January 6. That’s from the Justice Department’s Inspector General report.

    Some of those informants even crossed restricted lines. One entered the Capitol Building. But the FBI wants us to believe they were just passive observers.

    I will also break down one of the most egregious acts of media manipulation I’ve ever seen. The BBC maliciously edited Trump’s January 6 speech to make it sound like he incited violence.

    This episode exposes all the liars in the media, in government, in the courtroom, who twisted this event into a political weapon to interfere with the elections.

    Tune in!

    Key Takeaways

    Introduction (00:00)

    FBI had 26 confidential informants in the Capitol crowd (02:03)

    At least one informant entered the building (04:29)

    Informants engaged in illegal activities (05:12)

    Capitol security was intentionally under-prepared (09:48)

    Kamala Harris compares Jan. 6 to 9/11 and Pearl Harbor (15:03)

    Trump’s actual call for peaceful protest (22:07)

    Trump’s real-time tweets promoting peace (24:23)

    BBC doctored Trump’s speech with deceptive edits (28:14)

    BBC misrepresented the video timeline of protesters (31:27)

    Lack of media accountability and peer condemnation (35:43)

    Additional Resources

    📖 Read Ron’s book Truth and Persuasion in a Digital Revolution

    https://a.co/d/2GxCpsZ

    ✍️ Subscribe to Ron’s Substack for deeper investigations: https://ronaldwchapman.substack.com/

    💡 Free sample of Truth and Persuasion here:https://ronaldwchapman.substack.com/p/truth-and-persuasion-free-sample?r=5ojo21&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true

    📲 Follow Ron on social:

    Twitter:@RonChapmanAtty

    Instagram: @ronchapman

    👍 If you found this breakdown insightful, share it, and subscribe for real legal commentary grounded in experience.




    Más Menos
    47 m
Todavía no hay opiniones