Combination regimens improve survival in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC, but they also increase toxicity. Jorge Nieva, MD, shares how he talks with patients about potential adverse events. He describes the options available for prophylaxis and how he treats the toxicities that do arise.

Tackling central nervous system (CNS) disease in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer “is a huge problem, both from a quality-of-life perspective for patients and also from a longevity perspective,” explains Sid Devarakonda, MD, director of thoracic medical oncology at Swedish Cancer Institute in Seattle and clinical associate professor at Washington State University. He speaks with Aakash Desai, MD, MPH, associate director of the Phase 1 and Precision Oncology program at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, about how CNS metastases inform choices between regimens. Dr. Devarakonda also discusses how the recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of subcutaneous amivantamab (Rybrevant Faspro) may change his approach. “[Y]ou still need to be comfortable managing some of the toxicities that still persist, even with the subcutaneous formulation, but it's terribly convenient from a practical perspective,” he notes.

Dr. Desai and Dr. Devarakonda reported various financial relationships.

With multiple regimens available for advanced EGFRm NSCLC, selecting the best regimen for an individual patient is key. Jorge Nieva, MD, tells host Aakash Desai, MD, MPH, that the question shouldn’t be about who needs more efficacy, but rather understanding a patient’s personality and goals.