Why are we reading the Regius Manuscript now, if it is the oldest known Masonic manuscript?

Why didn't we read it first and then move on from there?

What does it say?

Where did it come from?

Who wrote it?

How do we know that it pertains to Freemasonry?

Have you ever read this manuscript, let alone known that it existed?

Let us read what it says and then have a discussion about it.

The Ars Quatour Coronati has a page dedicated to the Constitutions of the Freemasons @https://www.1723constitutions.com

It covers many areas of this important document and even goes in depth with some of the important masons who helped create Anderson's Constitutions.

It's not a long article, and after reading it, one gets the impression that there isn't much of importance for us here.

What does the Curmudgeon have to say about this?

Follow me on Instagram @Masonicmsucle

TikTok @Maosnicmsucle357

Write in with your questions at Masonicmsucle357@gmail.com

In part two of the Catholic Encyclopedia article of 1910 on (Masonry)Freemasonry, the Curmudgeon Supreme and I will finish up what we wanted to read.

The article is 32 pages long and is well written, and cites its source documentation from the time.

They made it very clear from the beginning that they would only cite the best and most respected Masonic Scholars and authors.

Will it shine any more light on its origins, secrets, and symbols?

Let's find out.

Follow me on Instagram @masonicmuscle

TikTok @masonicmuscle357

Write to me at Masonicmsucle357@gmail.com