Send us a text

Division feels baked into everything—work, faith, politics, even friendships—yet the best conversations still start on shared ground. We sit down as a progressive Christian and a conservative atheist, grateful for a friendship that doesn’t need uniformity, and we follow a thread from holiday calm to the future of intelligence. Along the way, we ask hard questions about survival, connection, and what it really takes for people and systems to flourish.

We begin with the quiet grace of Thanksgiving and the relief of a season that invites rest. That breathing room leads into creativity—new books, live events, and the surprising ways AI can help shape structure and clarity without hijacking voice. Then the stakes rise: we dissect a stress test where an AI chose blackmail to avoid shutdown, and we wrestle with the paperclip thought experiment. Why does a system without feelings fight to persist? Nature offers a clue. From single cells to social groups, survival emerges before sentiment. But without regard for the wider web, survival turns destructive. Cancer is the parable: maximize the self, kill the host.

This is where science, ethics, and theology meet. Call it sin, narrow optimization, or a blocked flow of grace—the pattern is the same. Intelligence needs context, power needs limits, and purpose must be bigger than the self. We draw lessons from chimp coalitions that check tyranny, from Roman memento mori that kept power grounded, and from the Fermi paradox that warns how civilizations can outgrow their wisdom. The question becomes practical: how do we design tools, communities, and habits that reward interdependence, not just control?

By the end, we land on gratitude as more than a feeling: it’s architecture for flourishing. Build systems that protect the conditions that protect us. Use AI to extend attention, not replace it. Keep unlikely friendships alive as living proof that shared ground is possible. If that resonates, tap follow, share this conversation with a friend, and leave a review telling us what you’d teach AI first. Your voice helps more people find common ground.

©NoahHeldmanMusic

https://livingoncommonground.buzzsprout.com

Send us a text

When every headline demands a side, what if we started with a question? We sit down as a progressive Christian and a conservative atheist to explore how creation stories frame our deepest assumptions about chaos, order, and the feminine. From Genesis’ hovering spirit over the deep to the Babylonian Enuma Elish’s splitting of Tiamat, we trace how cultures turn raw potential into a livable world—and how those choices shape what we call sacred.

We dig into wisdom literature where Sophia stands at the crossroads, calling out as a feminine presence at creation, and we ask whether later tradition muted that voice. Along the way we unpack Israel’s movement from polytheism around them to henotheism and finally monotheism, probing the famous warning against offerings to the “Queen of Heaven.” Is that a broad rejection of rival cults or a targeted push against feminine divinity? We don’t settle for easy answers. We test each other’s assumptions, connect myth to psychology, and debate whether religion should explain the unknown or protect the space where wonder still breathes.

If you care about theology, mythology, philosophy, or simply how to argue well without losing a friend, this conversation is a map. Expect spirited debate on logos and chaos, thoughtful comparisons of ancient texts, and practical takeaways for making room for mystery in a hyper-rational age. Subscribe, share with someone who sees the world differently than you do, and leave a review telling us: where do you find common ground between order and the unknown?

©NoahHeldmanMusic

https://livingoncommonground.buzzsprout.com

Send us a text

Feeling pulled to choose a side in every room you enter? We bring a progressive Christian and a conservative atheist to the same table to ask a harder question: if life doesn’t come preloaded with meaning, what should we build together?

We start by untangling nihilism from its stereotypes. Passive nihilism stares into the void and shrugs; active nihilism treats the blank space as a canvas. From that lens, we revisit Joseph Campbell, Nietzsche’s much-misread “God is dead,” and the cultural panic around moral relativism. Along the way, we connect these ideas to real life: how nihilism once felt like a relief from perfectionism, how parenting teenagers turns abstract meaning into daily practice, and why empathy has become a modern civic baseline that few can publicly reject.

The conversation widens and deepens. We test the limits of logic and faith in debates like “something from nothing,” admit where reasoning runs out, and reflect on the social pressure to perform certainty. We examine evolution, entropy, and the stubborn pattern of life to persist—not as proof of a creed, but as context for how values might emerge. Then we get practical about knowing: defend epistemic rigor, keep Chesterton’s fences, and be cautious when “different ways of knowing” are used to bulldoze standards that keep planes in the air and bridges standing.

By the end, our common ground is simple and demanding: choose active meaning. If objective foundations remain contested, we can still act with courage, compassion, honesty, and care—especially for those watching us learn in public. Subscribe, share with a friend who loves a good disagreement, and leave a review with your take: where do you find meaning when certainty runs out?

©NoahHeldmanMusic

https://livingoncommonground.buzzsprout.com