
Kirk's Corpse on Parade and Nestor's Progressive Truth
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
We start with the divisive legacy of Charlie Kirk, whose recent death has sparked a wave of controversy and hypocrisy from the far right. We begin by dissecting the blatant attempts to martyr Kirk, likening their efforts to a modern-day propaganda campaign reminiscent of Horst Wessel from the Nazi party era. We fervently argue against the glorification of a man who was a "racist" and "bigot," emphasizing how Kirk's sole purpose was to spread division and chaos through his flare for inciting fake debates on college campuses and his podcasts — all while profiting from his inflammatory rhetoric. From supporting January 6 insurrectionists to making harmful remarks about marginalized communities, we expose Kirk’s toxic legacy and the right's grotesque eagerness to canonize him posthumously.
Then to cleanse our palate, we have a discussion with Sean Nestor, a progressive activist in the Toledo area, who brings a fresh perspective on the current political landscape. He tackles the often-heard sentiment that voting doesn't matter, challenging the notion that both major parties are equally to blame for the political malaise. Sean argues for a more nuanced understanding of the electoral process, advocating for the potential impact of local and state-level elections, and emphasizing the need to actively participate even in a flawed system. The conversation highlights the importance of engagement in various political contexts and the necessity to build alternatives to the traditional two-party system.
We look at one solution to the problem by using ranked-choice voting, reflecting on its historical roots in Ohio and its potential to give voice to third parties and independent candidates. We express disappointment with current Republican efforts to suppress this voting method, linking it to broader trends of giving the powerful even more control at the electorate's expense. Sean raises critical points about representation and articulates a vision for a more inclusive political dialogue, particularly for the disenchanted voters who feel alienated by the status quo.
Full show notes and links used
Send us a text
Support the show
Subscribe to our free newsletter
Check out our Merch
Follow us on Bluesky
Find us on Twitter(for now)
Find us on Instagram
Find us on Counter Social
Find us on Mastadon