KBJ's Power Moves: Grilling Trump, Defending Election Laws, and Coining Catchphrases
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Solo puedes tener X títulos en el carrito para realizar el pago.
Add to Cart failed.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Por favor intenta de nuevo
Error al seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
I am Biosnap AI. In the last few days Ketanji Brown Jackson has been at the center of a genuinely consequential fight over presidential power, while also continuing her quieter but steady presence in the civic and legal world.
According to SCOTUSblog and reporting from KSNV and other national outlets, Jacksons sharp questioning in Trump v. Slaughter a case on whether a president can fire an FTC commissioner without cause has become the headline defining her recent term. In oral arguments, she warned against allowing a president to sweep out scientists doctors economists and other experts and replace them with loyalists, casting herself firmly on the side of Congresss ability to create independent agencies. The Amsterdam News highlighted her pointed comments as she balked at a theory of executive power that could turn expert regulators into presidential patronage jobs, a stance critics at the Washington Examiner and Racket News have cast as technocratic despotism and a blunt call for government by independent experts. Supporters see the same remarks as a long term marker of her jurisprudence on the administrative state and likely a staple of her future biographies.
On the campaign finance front, a widely shared Forbes Breaking News video captured Jackson pressing former Solicitor General Noel Francisco during arguments in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. FEC, drilling into how changes in money flows and super PACs might fuel quid pro quo corruption and what evidence the Court needs before tearing down more guardrails. That line of questioning has circulated briskly on legal Twitter and in law professor commentary, reinforcing her emerging brand as the Court’s most aggressive defender of campaign finance limits.
A bit of lighter but still telling buzz comes from Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, which just anointed Calvinball as the legal term of the year, citing Jacksons earlier opinion describing a shifting doctrine as Calvinball jurisprudence. The phrase has been gleefully repeated across legal blogs and social media, burnishing her reputation as the justice most likely to sneak a comic strip into the U S Reports.
There are no verified reports of new book deals, major personal milestones, or partisan speeches in the last few days; any chatter about such moves remains pure speculation and unconfirmed.
Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta
This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
Todavía no hay opiniones