Jena Griswold's lie about arguing before SCOTUS should disqualify her in AG race
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Solo puedes tener X títulos en el carrito para realizar el pago.
Add to Cart failed.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Por favor intenta de nuevo
Error al seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
Dan discusses the recent developments in the Tina Peters case, where the leading Democratic candidate for Colorado Attorney General, Jenna Griswold, is facing scrutiny for her qualifications.
Dan seriously doubts whether Griswold's claims of high-level courtroom experience are accurate, and how this might impact her campaign for Attorney General.
He also delves into the case of Tina Peters, who was sentenced to nine years in prison for releasing sensitive election information, and whether her sentence was influenced by her political views. Dan also touches on the topic of election integrity and the importance of consistency in the justice system.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Todavía no hay opiniones