Episodios

  • Prince Andrew And The Crying Game (10/5/25)

    Prince Andrew And The Crying Game (10/5/25)
    Oct 5 2025
    The rumor mill has churned out one of its juiciest royal tidbits: that King Charles once gave Prince Andrew such a scathing rebuke that the disgraced duke actually cried. Supposedly, Charles told him—point blank—that he would never be allowed back into royal life, and Andrew, who still harbored fantasies of a comeback, was so “utterly bereft” he broke down in tears. Think about it: a grown man, a prince of the realm, sobbing because his big brother told him his days of cutting ribbons and pretending to be useful were over. It’s like watching the office screw-up finally get fired and realizing he’s the only one surprised.


    Of course, this “Andrew cried” story comes with the usual royal rumor disclaimers: tabloid sources, unnamed insiders, and just enough dramatic flair to sound like a soap opera script. There’s no official confirmation from the palace, because let’s be real—they’d never admit something so humiliating. But whether it’s literally true or just tabloid fan-fiction, the image of Andrew bawling while Charles tells him he’s persona non grata fits almost too neatly. If nothing else, it paints a perfect picture of just how far Andrew has fallen—from strutting prince to pitiful footnote.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    16 m
  • Jeffrey Epstein's Survivors And The CRVA Deception (10/5/25)

    Jeffrey Epstein's Survivors And The CRVA Deception (10/5/25)
    Oct 5 2025
    The Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) was meant to guarantee Epstein’s survivors a voice in the legal process, but in practice their rights were ignored during the 2007–2008 non-prosecution agreement between Epstein’s legal team and federal prosecutors in Florida. Survivors were never told about the deal in advance, even though the CVRA required that they be notified of and consulted on major decisions in the case. Instead, prosecutors secretly arranged a sweetheart plea bargain that allowed Epstein to avoid federal charges and serve minimal county jail time under highly privileged conditions. The survivors only learned of the agreement after it had already been finalized, stripping them of their chance to object or even weigh in.

    Federal courts later acknowledged that prosecutors had violated the CVRA by keeping survivors in the dark, but the rulings stopped short of overturning the deal. This left survivors furious, as the law meant to protect them had been functionally useless in one of the most high-profile sex trafficking cases in U.S. history. Instead of being treated with the dignity and participation promised by the CVRA, they were sidelined to protect Epstein and the powerful figures around him. The episode stands as one of the clearest examples of how prosecutorial discretion and political pressure can render victims’ rights laws toothless when influential defendants are involved.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    13 m
  • Prince Andrew And The Rules For Royals (10/4/25)

    Prince Andrew And The Rules For Royals (10/4/25)
    Oct 5 2025
    There is a strong argument that royals like Prince Andrew live under a separate set of rules compared to ordinary citizens. In the UK, the Freedom of Information Act provides special protections: correspondence involving the monarch, the heir, and the second in line is completely exempt from disclosure, and communications involving other royals are covered by a qualified exemption. This means that information which would normally be made public for politicians or officials can remain permanently hidden when it involves the royal family. Similarly, judges have ruled that the security costs for royals cannot be made public, ensuring that vast sums of taxpayer money spent on their protection are kept secret in a way no ordinary public figure could expect.


    contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    23 m
  • Prince Andrew And His Problem With The Word No (10/4/25)

    Prince Andrew And His Problem With The Word No (10/4/25)
    Oct 5 2025
    Prince Andrew has shown repeatedly an inclination to push past initial rejections or objections—one of the more glaring examples was his decision to proceed with the controversial Newsnight interview, despite widespread advice against it. Royal aides and media advisors reportedly cautioned that such a public confrontation would be fraught, but Andrew moved ahead anyway, showing a willingness to press on even when many thought he should decline.


    Another instance lies in the public and media scrutiny of whether Andrew would express regret over his association with Epstein. During the interview, he was twice asked if he would call his friendship a “mistake,” and he declined both times—rather than accepting a simpler path to remorse or damage control, he held firm.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    18 m
  • Prince Andrew And The Pump Fake (10/4/25)

    Prince Andrew And The Pump Fake (10/4/25)
    Oct 5 2025
    Prince Andrew was reported to be cooperating with investigators looking into Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes, though the extent of that cooperation was unclear. Some sources suggested he had opened communication with U.S. authorities, but at the same time, prosecutors noted that he still hadn’t agreed to a formal interview. U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman had previously criticized the prince for providing “zero cooperation,” which made these new claims of engagement appear contradictory.

    Even with suggestions that Andrew had begun assisting, no record of testimony or substantive statements was confirmed. His cooperation appeared limited, more a matter of optics than real accountability. Observers pointed out that unless he agreed to sit down for questioning under oath, his role remained more symbolic than practical, leaving the larger questions about his ties to Epstein unresolved.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    13 m
  • Sky Roberts And His Interview With The Daily Mail (10/4/25)

    Sky Roberts And His Interview With The Daily Mail (10/4/25)
    Oct 5 2025
    In the interview, Virginia Roberts’s father, Sky Roberts, says he dropped his daughter off at Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion, shook Epstein’s hand, and asked him what she would be doing there. He also recounts meeting Ghislaine Maxwell and describes her as “despicable.” Roberts uses the moment to express deep frustration—he believes Epstein and Maxwell’s operations were wrong on a base moral level, and he resents how little accountability powerful people around Epstein have faced.

    Roberts is especially critical of Prince Andrew, arguing that he’s shown “no remorse.” He views the settlement Andrew made with Virginia as an implicit acknowledgement of wrongdoing, insisting that paying her off rather than admitting guilt feels like an attempt to silence her. Throughout the interview, Roberts frames his daughter’s story as one that demands transparency—not protection for the powerful.

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    21 m
  • Prince Andrew Asks For The Original Picture During His Lawsuit With Virginia Roberts (10/4/25)

    Prince Andrew Asks For The Original Picture During His Lawsuit With Virginia Roberts (10/4/25)
    Oct 4 2025
    Prince Andrew has pushed for access to the original, unaltered version of the now-famous photograph showing him with Virginia Roberts Giuffre, arguing that the image could hold the key to challenging her allegations. His legal team has questioned the authenticity of the photo for years, suggesting it may have been doctored, and Andrew has maintained he does not recall ever meeting Giuffre despite the picture. By demanding the original, he seeks forensic analysis that could either validate or undermine one of the most damning pieces of evidence tying him to Epstein’s trafficking network.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    20 m
  • Prince Andrew And Night Club Named Tramp (10/4/25)

    Prince Andrew And Night Club Named Tramp (10/4/25)
    Oct 4 2025
    The controversy surrounding Prince Andrew and the Tramp nightclub stems from allegations made by Virginia Giuffre, who claims that in March 2001, when she was 17, she was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell to London and taken to the Tramp nightclub. Giuffre alleges that she danced with Prince Andrew there before being taken to a house in Belgravia, where she says she was sexually assaulted. The now-infamous photo showing Andrew with his arm around Giuffre’s waist, with Maxwell in the background, allegedly taken that same night, became one of the most damning pieces of evidence in the case. Witnesses later claimed to have seen the pair together at Tramp, fueling speculation that the prince’s relationship with Epstein and Maxwell was far closer than he had admitted publicly.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    26 m