How the Hell Did the Missouri Compromise Sow the Seeds of Civil War? Podcast Por  arte de portada

How the Hell Did the Missouri Compromise Sow the Seeds of Civil War?

How the Hell Did the Missouri Compromise Sow the Seeds of Civil War?

Escúchala gratis

Ver detalles del espectáculo

OFERTA POR TIEMPO LIMITADO | Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes

$14.95/mes despues- se aplican términos.

The Missouri Compromise is often remembered as a clever fix — a temporary truce, a line on a map, a way to “save the Union.”

But that’s not what it really was.

In 1820, Congress faced a choice it had spent decades trying not to make: confront the future of slavery now, while the country was still small and fragile — or postpone the reckoning and keep the system expanding. Congress chose postponement. And by doing so, it didn’t avoid the slavery question. It built it into the machinery of national politics.

This episode tells the story of the Missouri Crisis and Compromise as a turning point — the moment the United States chose accommodation over confrontation, and set itself on a path of escalating sectional crisis that would eventually end in Civil War.

In this episode, we cover:

• Why Missouri statehood triggered an explosion: slavery’s expansion, power in the Senate, and sectional deadlock

• The Tallmadge Amendment: what it tried to do — and why the South treated it as an existential threat

• Slavery’s transformation after 1790: cotton, the domestic slave trade, and the rebirth of plantation power

• Fear and hardening ideology: Haiti, Gabriel’s Rebellion, and the end of gradual-emancipation optimism

• The political math behind the crisis: the Virginia Dynasty, 3/5 representation, and northern fears of planter domination

• The compromise deal: Maine + Missouri, and the 36°30′ line that “contained” slavery on paper

• Missouri’s pro-slavery constitution — and the fight over banning free Black Americans from entering the state

• Jefferson’s “fire bell in the night”: why many understood the crisis wasn’t solved, just deferred

• The pattern that follows: balance → containment → postponement (Texas, Mexican Cession, Kansas-Nebraska)

• The core question: did the Missouri Compromise create more problems than it solved?

Guiding question:

Did the Missouri Compromise end up creating more problems than it ultimately resolved?

Sources referenced:

American Pageant

Give Me Liberty

Daniel Walker Howe, What Hath God Wrought

Charles Sellers, The Market Revolution: Jacksonian America, 1815–1846

John Craig Hammond, “President, Planter, Politician: James Monroe, the Missouri Crisis, and the Politics of Slavery”

📌 Subscribe → https://www.youtube.com/@HowtheHellDidWeGetHerePodcast/videos?sub_confirmation=1

🎧 Listen on Apple Podcasts → https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/how-the-hell-did-we-get-here/id1765781522

Chapters:

00:00 — Cold open: the choice Congress didn’t want to make

01:21 — Welcome + sources

03:38 — The Missouri Compromise: not a fix, a choice

05:04 — Why many thought slavery would fade

06:34 — Cotton + expansion + the rebirth of slavery

08:12 — Haiti/Gabriel’s Rebellion and hardening white politics

09:22 — Missouri applies for statehood: why it detonates

10:09 — Congress’s earlier attempts to limit slavery in Missouri

11:19 — Hemp, growth, and Missouri’s enslaved population

12:00 — The Illinois slavery fight and the “butternut” West

14:25 — The illusion breaks: slavery is advancing west

15:03 — Tallmadge Amendment: restriction + gradual emancipation

16:42 — Not abolitionism: northern fear of planter domination

18:02 — Southern backlash: states’ rights and disunion threats

20:24 — Amendment passes House, dies in Senate: sectional deadlock

20:57 — Why the Union felt fragile in 1819–1820

23:05 — Maine leverage and the deal-making logic

23:42 — The 36°30′ line and Monroe signs the...

Todavía no hay opiniones