• Glossip v. Oklahoma | Case No. 22-7466 | Date Argued: 10/9/24

  • Oct 9 2024
  • Duración: 1 h y 43 m
  • Podcast

Glossip v. Oklahoma | Case No. 22-7466 | Date Argued: 10/9/24

  • Resumen

  • The questions presented are: 1. a. Whether the State's suppression of the key prosecution witness's admission he was under the care of a psychiatrist and failure to correct that witness's false testimony about that care and related diagnosis violate the due process of law. See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963); Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959).

    b. Whether the entirety of the suppressed evidence must be considered when assessing the materiality of Brady and Napue claims. See Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S.

    2. Whether due process of law requires reversal, where a capital conviction is so infected with errors that the State no longer seeks to defend it. See Escobar v. Texas, 143 S. Ct. 557 (2023) (mem.).

    Más Menos
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre Glossip v. Oklahoma | Case No. 22-7466 | Date Argued: 10/9/24

Calificaciones medias de los clientes

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.