Happy Friday, everyone. I haven’t had an off week in a while, but it was refreshing. However, after a short break, I’m back not easing in gently. This week’s episode gets right to the heart of some of the most broken aspects of our approach to business, people, and technology.

We’ve got one of the biggest companies in the world using intimidation tactics to cut headcount. I’m also breaking down a major tech report showing that the AI “productivity boost” isn’t materializing quite how we thought. And finally, I cannot believe some of the claims already coming out on what to expect from GPT-5 before it’s even arrived. You’ll see that each one is pointing to the same root problem: we’re making big decisions from a place of panic, pressure, and misplaced confidence.

So, let’s talk about what’s really going on and what to do instead.

⸻

Amazon’s Relocation Mandate Isn’t Bold. It’s Reckless.

Amazon gave employees 30 days to decide whether they wanted to relocate to a major hub or quit with no severance. It’s the corporate version of “move or else,” and it’s being masked as a strategy for collaboration and innovation. I break down why this move reeks of fear-based downsizing, what employees need to know before making a decision, and how leaders can handle change like adults instead of middle school bullies.

⸻

Microsoft’s Work Trend Index Reveals a Dangerous Disconnect

Microsoft’s latest workplace report says people are drowning in tasks, leaders want more output, and everyone thinks AI is the solution. But it comes with an interesting twist. Turns out AI isn’t actually giving people their time back. I unpack the flawed logic many leaders are using, the risky gap between leaders and employees, and why the answer isn’t more agents. What we really need is better thinking before we deploy them.

⸻

GPT-5 and the Singularity Obsession: Why the Hype Misses the Point

OpenAI’s next model release is on its way and plenty of articles are talking about it ushering in the AI singularity. I’m not convinced, but even if it proves true, the danger isn’t the tech. It’s how overconfident we are in deploying it without the readiness to manage the complexity it brings. I explain why the comparisons to black holes are (sort of) valid, why benchmark scores don’t equal capability, and what history can teach us about mistaking potential for preparedness.

⸻

If this episode hits home, share it with someone who needs to hear it. And as always, leave a rating, drop a comment, and follow for future breakdowns that help you lead with clarity in a world that’s speeding up.

—

Show Notes:

In this Weekly Update, Christopher tackles three high-impact stories shaping the future of business, tech, and human leadership. He opens with Amazon’s aggressive and questionable relocation mandate and the ethical and strategic issues it exposes. Then he dives into Microsoft’s 2025 Work Trend Index, exploring what it says (and doesn’t say) about AI productivity and the human toll of poor implementation. Finally, he takes a grounded look at the hype surrounding GPT-5 and the so-called AI singularity, offering a cautionary lens rooted in data, leadership experience, and the real-world consequences of moving too fast.

Timestamps:

00:00 – Welcome Back and Episode Overview

01:04 – Amazon’s Relocation Ultimatum

20:30 – Microsoft’s Work Trend Index Breakdown

40:54 – GPT-5, the Singularity, and the Real Risk

49:42 – Final Thoughts and Wrap-Up

#AmazonRTO #MicrosoftWorkTrend #GPT5 #OpenAI #FutureOfWork #DigitalLeadership #AIstrategy #AIethics #AIproductivity #HumanCenteredTech

Congratulations on making it through another week and half way through 2025. This week’s episode is a bit of a throwback. If you don't remember or are new here, in January I laid out my top 10 realistic predictions for where AI, emerging tech, and the world of work were heading in 2025. I committed to circling back mid-year, and despite my shock at how quick it came, we’ve hit the halfway point, so it’s time to revisit where things actually stand.

If you didn't catch the original, I'd highly recommend checking it out.

Now, some predictions have held surprisingly steady. Others have gone in directions I didn’t fully anticipate or have escalated much faster than expected. And, I added a few new trends that weren’t even on my radar in January but are quickly becoming noteworthy.

With that, here’s how this week’s episode is structured:

⸻

Revisiting My 10 Original Predictions

In this first section, I walk through the 10 predictions I made at the start of the year and update where each one stands today. From AI’s emotional mimicry and growing trust risks, to deepfake normalization, to widespread job cuts justified by AI adoption, this section is a gut check. Some of the most popular narratives around AI, including the push for return-to-office policies, the role of AI in redefining skills, and the myth of “flattening” capability growth, are playing out in unexpected ways.

⸻

Pressing Issues I’d Add Now

These next five trends didn’t make the original list, but based on what’s unfolded this year, they should have. I cover the growing militarization of AI and the uncomfortable questions it raises around autonomy and decision-making in defense. I get into the overlooked environmental impact of large-scale AI adoption, from energy and water consumption to data center strain. I talk about how organizational AI use is quietly becoming a liability as more teams build black box dependencies no one can fully track or explain.

⸻

Early Trends to Watch

The last section takes a look at signals I’m keeping an eye on, even if they’re not critical just yet. Think wearable AI, humanoid robotics, and the growing gap between tool access and human capability. Each of these has the potential to reshape our understanding of human-AI interaction, but for now, they remain on the edge of broader adoption. These are the areas where I’m asking questions, paying attention to signals, and anticipating where we might need to be ready to act before the headlines catch up.

⸻

If this episode was helpful, would you share it with someone? Also, leave a rating, drop a comment, and follow for future breakdowns that go beyond the headlines and help you lead with clarity in the AI age.

—

Show Notes:

In this mid-year check-in, Christopher revisits his original 2025 predictions and reflects on what’s played out, what’s accelerated, and what’s emerging. From AI dependency and widespread job displacement to growing ethical concerns and overlooked operational risks, this extended update brings a no-spin, executive-level perspective on what leaders need to be watching now.

—

Timestamps:

00:00 – Introduction

00:55 - Revisiting 2025 Predictions

02:46 - AI's Emotional Nature: A Double-Edged Sword

06:27 - Deepfakes: Crisis Levels and Public Skepticism

12:01 - AI Dependency and Mental Health Concerns

16:29 - Broader AI Adoption and Capability Growth

23:11 - Automation and Unemployment

29:46 - Polarization of Return to Office

36:00 - Reimagining Job Roles in the Age of AI

39:23 - The Slow Adoption of AI in the Workplace

40:23 - Exponential Complexity in Cybersecurity

42:29 - The Struggle for Personal Data Privacy

47:44 - The Growing Need for Purpose in Work

50:49 - Emerging Issues: Militarization and AI Dependency

56:55 - Environmental Concerns and AI Polarization

01:04:02 - Impact of AI on Children and Future Trends

01:08:43 - Final Thoughts and Upcoming Updates

—

#AIPredictions #AI2025 #AIstrategy #AIethics #DigitalLeadership

Happy Friday, everyone! This week I’m back to my usual four updates, and while they may seem disconnected on the surface, you’ll see some bigger threads running through them all.

All seem to indicate we’re outsourcing to AI faster than we can supervise, are layering automation on top of bias without addressing the root issues, and letting convenience override discernment in places that carry life-or-death stakes.

With that, let’s get into it.

⸻

Stanford’s AI Therapy Study Shows We’re Automating Harm

New research from Stanford tested how today’s top LLMs are handling crisis counseling, and the results are disturbing. From stigmatizing mental illness to recommending dangerous actions in crisis scenarios, these AI therapists aren’t just “not ready”… they are making things worse. I walk through what the study got right, where even its limitations point to deeper risk, and why human experience shouldn’t be replaced by synthetic empathy.

⸻

Microsoft Says You’ll Be Training AI Agents Soon, Like It or Not

In Microsoft’s new 2025 Work Trend Index, 41% of leaders say they expect their teams to be training AI agents in the next five years. And 36% believe they’ll be managing them. If you’re hearing “agent boss” and thinking “not my problem,” think again. This isn’t a future trend; it’s already happening. I break down what AI agents really are, how they’ll change daily work, and why organizations can’t just bolt them on without first measuring human readiness.

⸻

Workday’s Bias Lawsuit Could Reshape AI Hiring

Workday is being sued over claims that its hiring algorithms discriminated against candidates based on race, age, and disability status. But here’s the real issue: most companies can’t even explain how their AI hiring tools make decisions. I unpack why this lawsuit could set a critical precedent, how leaders should respond now, and why blindly trusting your recruiting tech could expose you to more than just bad hires. Unchecked, it could lead to lawsuits you never saw coming.

⸻

Military AI Is Here, and We’re Not Ready for the Moral Tradeoffs

From autonomous fighter jet simulations to OpenAI defense contracts, military AI is no longer theoretical; it’s operational. The U.S. Army is staffing up with Silicon Valley execs. AI drones are already shaping modern warfare. But what happens when decisions of life and death get reduced to “green bars” on output reports? I reflect on why we need more than technical and military experts in the room and what history teaches us about what’s lost when we separate force from humanity.

⸻

If this episode was helpful, would you share it with someone? Also, leave a rating, drop a comment, and follow for future breakdowns that go beyond the headlines and help you lead with clarity in the AI age.

—

Show Notes:

In this Weekly Update, Christopher Lind unpacks four critical developments in AI this week. First, he starts by breaking down Stanford’s research on AI therapists and the alarming shortcomings in how large language models handle mental health crises. Then, he explores Microsoft’s new workplace forecast, which predicts a sharp rise in agent-based AI tools and the hidden demands this shift will place on employees. Next, he analyzes the legal storm brewing around Workday’s recruiting AI and what this could mean for hiring practices industry-wide. Finally, he closes with a timely look at the growing militarization of AI and why ethical oversight is being outpaced by technological ambition.

Timestamps:

00:00 – Introduction

01:05 – Episode Overview

02:15 – Stanford’s Study on AI Therapists

18:23 – Microsoft’s Agent Boss Predictions

30:55 – Workday’s AI Bias Lawsuit

43:38 – Military AI and Moral Consequences

52:59 – Final Thoughts and Wrap-Up

#StanfordAI #AItherapy #AgentBosses #MicrosoftWorkTrend #WorkdayLawsuit #AIbias #MilitaryAI #AIethics #FutureOfWork #AIstrategy #DigitalLeadership