This April, we're deep into our "movies so bad we had to build a theme around them" series… and this week might be the breaking point.

Kat brought us Subservience, starring Megan Fox… and the jury is not okay.

What should have been a sharp, thought-provoking sci-fi thriller instead spirals into a hollow, confused, bargain-bin imitation of better AI films. Flat performances, nonsensical character decisions, and a script that feels like it was generated and never edited… this one tested everyone's patience.

James, Kristina, and Kat all came in ready to evaluate. They left united in frustration.

Verdict: Guilty.

Of wasting our time, insulting the genre, and making us question our life choices… and our friendship with Kat.

If you've ever hate-watched a movie and needed validation, this episode is for you.

The month of April is upon us and the Film Jury will be deliberating on four films that they hate so much they just had to devote an entire month to the movies.

The first entry will be Freddy vs. Jason from 2003 which finally puts the Springwood Slasher up against the king of Crystal Lake in this mash-up flick that was decades in the making.

Jurors James, Kat and Kristina dive into the full plot of the film, cinematography, directing, acting, special effects (or lack thereof) and more!

The film gets a round of guilty verdicts from the jurors - the first film in the two dozen plus movies reviewed to be sent to film jail.

In this episode of Film Jury, we put the cult classic April Fool's Day on trial.

What starts as a seemingly straightforward slasher quickly twists into something far more unexpected, forcing us to question whether clever storytelling can redeem a film that plays with audience expectations this aggressively. Does the payoff justify the ride, or does it leave viewers feeling cheated?

James and Kristina deliver a guilty verdict, arguing that the film's structure undercuts its own tension and fails to deliver on the promise it builds. Kat, however, stands firmly in the not guilty camp, defending the film's bold narrative choice and its lasting impact on the genre.

Was this an innovative subversion ahead of its time, or a misfire that sacrifices satisfaction for shock value? We break it all down in this episode of Film Jury.