Eye On The Target Hour 2
The show discusses national concealed-carry reciprocity, noting that Donald Trump previously stated he would sign such legislation if it reached his desk. Hosts argue it faces challenges in the U.S. Senate, though growing opposition from anti-gun groups suggests the bill has a real chance of advancing. They criticize the Fraternal Order of Police for opposing H.R. 38, saying it misrepresents both state-rights arguments and how easily law enforcement can verify out-of-state permits.

They compare national reciprocity to driver's license recognition, arguing it would function similarly. The hosts mock claims that police couldn't verify permits from other states and share anecdotes about interstate ticketing and identification.

The conversation shifts to New York City's dramatic increase in firearm and concealed-carry permit applications following the Supreme Court's Bruen decision. With police retirements rising and residents expressing a desire for self-protection, many New Yorkers are shocked by the lengthy and complex permitting process after believing media claims that guns are easy to obtain.

The hosts then review Everytown for Gun Safety's Thanksgiving messaging, which frames gun-related debates and myths for holiday discussions. They push back against Everytown's data, arguing that:

• Criminals acquire guns regardless of laws.

• Strong gun laws don't reduce violence, pointing to Chicago.

• Defensive gun uses—often involving no shots fired—are undercounted.

• Gun-control groups manipulate statistics to fit their narrative.

The segment briefly includes humor, banter between the hosts, commercials, and references to organizations supportive of firearms training and advocacy.

Later, they mention a Queens, NY case where a senior citizen defended himself with a gun but ended up jailed—highlighting what they view as New York's unjust system for lawful gun owners.

The hosts, Amanda Suffolk and Rob Campbell, open Eye on the Target Radio with updates on recent community activism around local zoning changes. Their township attempted to insert anti-gun regulations, safety rules, and even restrictions impacting Amanda's earth-sheltered home into the zoning manual.

A large public turnout at earlier meetings caused officials to table the gun-related proposals, but the community wasn't satisfied. Amanda and Rob organized neighbors, distributed information, researched options, and brought in statements from organizations like the Ohio Citizens Defense League—one warning the proposed rules were unconstitutional and could lead to lawsuits.

At the next meeting, over 150 residents attended, surprising township leaders. The community pushed two options:

1. Remove the overreach from the zoning book, or

2. Pursue the "nuclear option" of eliminating zoning entirely.

They collected half the needed signatures for the latter during the meeting. Their message to listeners: pay attention to local overreach and get involved.

Amanda reads humorous AI-generated descriptions of Rob. Highlights include:

• Rob is portrayed as the technical gun geek with deep mechanical firearm knowledge.

• Their on-air dynamic is described as "playful sibling rivalry"—Amanda energetic, Rob technical.

• AI attributes expertise, historical knowledge, and collector insight to him.

• Some descriptions amuse the hosts, especially claims he favors "thoughtful regulation." Amanda counters that Rob is more of a "paint your keister blue and yell freedom" type.

They joke about who really plots their activism—Amanda executing plans while Rob quietly steers from behind the scenes.

Throughout the show, multiple sponsor messages air, including:

• Realize Firearms Awareness Coalition

• Project ChildSafe

• The Complete Combatant training

• Riding Shotgun with Charlie

• Decoding Firearms

• Locked-In Grip

• Rust is Bad

• Various local firearms businesses

• D.C. Project

In the final minute, Amanda notes an upcoming news topic:

• The ATF is back in the headlines, and President Trump has nominated Robert Cekada for ATF leadership.

The hosts discuss AI-based gun-detection systems that are being installed in some schools as an alternative to traditional metal detectors. These systems are intended to distinguish regular metal objects from firearms, but real-world performance has been problematic.

A school in Baltimore had major false positives, including an incident where police drew guns on a student because the AI flagged a bag of Doritos as a weapon. Another event involved officers pulling guns on multiple students, only to later find no firearm at all. The hosts argue that such technology creates a false sense of security, wastes public money, and may lead to dangerous overreactions by law enforcement.

They highlight concerns that relying on AI for critical decisions—when everyday devices like phones and GPS frequently glitch—is risky. They also joke about how students would intentionally test or defeat the system with items shaped like guns.

The conversation shifts to "smart guns" and automated tech in firearms, expressing distrust in systems that could malfunction, require updates, or depend on connectivity—especially when lives depend on them.

Next, the hosts cover a news story from Iowa, where gangs have developed a "lending library" of shared firearms used across multiple crimes. Two gang members received long prison sentences after investigators connected several shootings to the same shared guns. The hosts question the reliability of forensic claims about matching bullets or casings to a specific gun, noting variables like barrel temperature, ammunition type, and mechanical differences.

Throughout, the tone mixes serious critique with humor, skepticism about technology, and commentary on overregulation and the unintended consequences of tech-dependent policing and firearms restrictions.

The hosts of Eye on the Target Radio, Amanda and Rob, open the show with light banter about AI describing Rob as "unenthusiastic," which leads to humorous discussion about their personalities. They then shift to a local controversy in their small rural township, where proposed zoning changes attempted to restrict gun use, hunting, and even home and building designs. The proposals triggered strong community pushback, especially from gun owners, resulting in many of the controversial provisions being struck from the document. A newspaper article reported these rollbacks, but concerns remain because officials hinted that some regulations might be revisited in the future. Amanda describes ongoing civic engagement and upcoming township meetings.

The discussion then moves to national firearm policy, particularly the NFA (National Firearms Act). Rob explains confusion around current regulations, how firearms classifications have evolved, and the possibility that some NFA restrictions (like those on suppressors and short-barreled firearms) might be removed depending on court or legislative outcomes. They explore historical firearms, regulatory complexity, and lingering issues about what could realistically be deregulated versus what will likely remain heavily restricted.

The segment also includes ads and promos for firearms-related organizations, training programs, and safety initiatives.

Themes: Self-defense rights • Gun control laws • Public safety • Supreme Court cases

🔹 Self-Defense on Public Transit

• The show opens with a discussion about violent attacks on public transportation, referencing a Ukrainian woman killed on a bus and a recent stabbing of a pregnant couple in St. Louis.

• Debate centers on whether citizens should be allowed to carry firearms on buses and trains for protection.

• Missouri and Illinois legislators are reportedly considering changes to self-defense laws for public transport, pushed by activists Susan Myers and Rhonda Zell.

• Amanda reads an op-ed suggesting that if one lawful citizen on the bus had been armed, the tragedy might have been prevented.

🔹 Debate Over Defensive Gun Use

• The hosts highlight a Giffords Foundation article criticizing the rise in defensive gun uses (DGUs).

• Amanda and Rob argue that self-defense is a fundamental human right, contrasting this with what they see as attempts to shame lawful defenders.

• They reference the Daniel Penny case in New York (subway restraint death) as an example of punishing citizens who intervene.

• The hosts express frustration that people defending themselves are increasingly treated as criminals.

🔹 Gun Industry and Regulation

• Discussion shifts to Glock firearm lawsuits in California and potential design changes due to illegal weapon modifications.

• They speculate about a new "Gen 6 or 7" Glock, while questioning whether safety issues could repeat problems like those seen with the Sig P320.

• The conversation underscores broader concerns about liability and anti-gun activism in the legal system.

🔹 Media and Anti-Gun Messaging

• Amanda criticizes Psychology Today and the Ad Council for promoting "anti-gun propaganda," arguing they distort statistics.

• She points out that many studies define "children" as ages 0–24 to inflate firearm-related death numbers.

• The hosts accuse such organizations of agenda-driven manipulation, saying they use misleading data to support disarmament efforts.

🔹 Supreme Court Watch

• The segment closes with updates on two Second Amendment cases granted certiorari by the U.S. Supreme Court:

  1. Wolford v. Lopez (Hawaii's "vampire rule") – challenges restrictions on carrying firearms on private property without explicit permission.

  2. U.S. v. Himani – questions whether individuals who use marijuana or other controlled substances can legally possess firearms.

• The hosts emphasize these cases could significantly shape national gun-carry and drug-use laws under the Second Amendment.

🔹 Overall Takeaway

• The episode portrays a strong defense of personal safety and constitutional rights, expressing distrust of media narratives, government regulation, and anti-gun organizations.

• Tone: Outspoken, defensive, and advocacy-oriented, blending news, commentary, and calls for vigilance about Second Amendment freedoms.

Topics: Remembering Shirley Wattrell • NRA restructuring • Trends in gun culture and policy • Firearms safety advocacy

🔹 Tribute to Shirley Wattrell

• The show opened with the hosts mourning Shirley Wattrell, a domestic-violence survivor who became a firearms instructor and author of Heels to Holster.

• Her life story was being adapted into a film produced by Dean Cain, scheduled for release in 2026. She passed away on November 1, 2025 while the movie was in post-production.

• Amanda described Shirley's deep creative involvement, from writing the script to coordinating music and on-set details.

🔹 NRA Restructuring and Industry Changes

• Major focus on the NRA's announced reorganization, revealed late October 2025.

• Key motivations: ongoing financial strain and fallout from NY Attorney General Letitia James's legal actions since 2018.

• NRA plans include:

  • Launching a member mobile app (Q1 2026) with event listings, digital content, and discounts.

  • Consolidation of print and digital magazines under "NRA Media."

  • Renewed investment in education, clubs, competitions, and training.

  • A chief operating officer role to manage day-to-day operations in Fairfax.

  • Streamlined communication and reduced mass mailings.

  • Continued legal advocacy through the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA).

• Discussion also touched on declining gun sales (down ~40%), the industry's lack of innovation, and possible resurgence if short-barreled rifle regulations change.

🔹 Broader Second Amendment and Firearms News

• Mention of Realize Firearms Awareness Coalition, Project ChildSafe, Locked-In Grip, and other safety or training organizations.

• The hosts praised efforts to promote responsible gun ownership, especially among women.

• Later in the show, they criticized a New York City Council bill mandating gun-store warning signs, comparing it to past tobacco-labeling laws that were struck down as government overreach.

🔹 Overall Tone and Themes

• The episode balanced tribute, advocacy, and critique:

  • Remembering a 2A icon.

  • Analyzing NRA reforms and industry direction.

  • Promoting safety, education, and self-reliance.

  • Questioning bureaucratic or symbolic regulations.