A recent court case in Italy has raised an important question for employers everywhere.

An employee was injured while working from home, not due to faulty equipment, but during a normal work task. Initially, her claim was denied because the incident occurred at home. The court disagreed and ruled the injury as work-related.

While this may seem like a unique case, from an Irish perspective, it highlights something that is already well established.

In this episode of Ergonomically Speaking, Niamh explores what this case means for organisations managing DSE risk in a hybrid working environment, and why many current approaches, while technically compliant, may not be enough.

👉 Full blog post: https://boyneergonomics.ie/when-compliance-isnt-enough-rethinking-dse-in-a-hybrid-world/

💬 Let's Keep the Conversation Going!

Have a question, a tip, or an “aha!” moment from this episode?

www.boyneergonomics.ie

Instagram: boyne_ergonomics

Bluesky: boyne-ergonomics.bsky.social

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/niamhpentony

TikTok: @niamh_boyneergo

🙌 Thank You for Listening!

If you found this episode useful, share it with a colleague in HR, Health & Safety or Operations.

Subscribe for more evidence-based ergonomics insights, and if you’re planning your 2026 ergonomics strategy, get in touch — I’d love to help.

In this episode of Ergonomically Speaking…, I’m exploring a pattern I see regularly in my work with organisations managing DSE and wider ergonomic risk.

Many organisations start out with a largely reactive approach to DSE. Someone reports discomfort, an assessment is arranged, and adjustments are made. At low volume, this approach can feel efficient and entirely workable.

But as organisations grow and become more complex, that same model can start to struggle.

In this episode, I discuss:

1. why reactive DSE models often work well at low volume
2. what changes as assessment demand increases
3. how hybrid working and role variation add complexity
4. why consistency becomes more important as organisations scale
5. the difference between reactive support and proactive DSE management
6. how building internal capability can reduce pressure without replacing specialist input
7. why most organisations benefit from a blended approach

I also clarify an important point around compliance: DSE workstation risk assessments are a legal requirement, regardless of whether discomfort has been reported. The distinction isn’t whether assessments are completed, but the depth and intensity of follow-up required.

This episode is aimed at employers, HR, Health & Safety, and Facilities teams who are starting to feel the strain of increased DSE demand and are considering how to manage it more sustainably.

Thoughtful structure doesn’t add complexity — it makes everything else easier to manage.

👉 Full blog post: https://boyneergonomics.ie/when-dse-demand-increases-why-reactive-models-stop-working/

💬 Let's Keep the Conversation Going!

Have a question, a tip, or an “aha!” moment from this episode?

www.boyneergonomics.ie

Instagram: boyne_ergonomics

Bluesky: boyne-ergonomics.bsky.social

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/niamhpentony

TikTok: @niamh_boyneergo

🙌 Thank You for Listening!

If you found this episode useful, share it with a colleague in HR, Health & Safety or Operations.

Subscribe for more evidence-based ergonomics insights, and if you’re planning your 2026 ergonomics strategy, get in touch — I’d love to help.

In this episode of Ergonomically Speaking…, I explore one of the most common patterns I see in hybrid and remote-heavy organisations:

DSE being managed reactively instead of proactively.

Someone reports discomfort.

An assessment is arranged.

A recommendation is made.

And then… the same issue appears again somewhere else.

In this episode, I break down why this happens, why hybrid working makes it more likely, and what a more effective, structured approach to DSE management actually looks like in practice.

In this episode, I cover:

1. What reactive DSE management typically looks like in organisations
2. Why hybrid and remote work environments amplify DSE risk
3. The hidden cost of waiting for discomfort, complaints or referrals
4. What proactive DSE management really means (and what it doesn’t)
5. How proactive DSE reduces admin, repetition and escalation
6. The role of clear processes, escalation pathways and consistency
7. Why proactive DSE is about risk control, not perfect workstations

This episode is particularly relevant for:

1. Health & Safety professionals
2. HR teams
3. Facilities managers
4. Senior leaders responsible for hybrid or remote teams

A key takeaway

Proactive DSE management doesn’t require more effort —

it requires better structure.

When DSE is embedded into onboarding, role change, and hybrid working processes, issues are identified earlier, managed more calmly, and far less likely to escalate.

👉 Full blog post: https://boyneergonomics.ie/reactive-vs-proactive-dse-management-in-hybrid-remote-organisations/

💬 Let's Keep the Conversation Going!

Have a question, a tip, or an “aha!” moment from this episode?

www.boyneergonomics.ie

Instagram: boyne_ergonomics

Bluesky: boyne-ergonomics.bsky.social

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/niamhpentony

TikTok: @niamh_boyneergo

🙌 Thank You for Listening!

If you found this episode useful, share it with a colleague in HR, Health & Safety or Operations.

Subscribe for more evidence-based ergonomics insights, and if you’re planning your 2026 ergonomics strategy, get in touch — I’d love to help.