Episode 387 - Steven Adler - Noncompete and Restrictive Covenants
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Solo puedes tener X títulos en el carrito para realizar el pago.
Add to Cart failed.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Por favor intenta de nuevo
Error al seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
Summary
In this episode of The Compliance Guy podcast, Sean M Weiss interviews Steven Adler, co-chair of litigation at Mandelbaum Barrett PC, focusing on non-compete agreements and restrictive covenants in healthcare. They discuss the complexities of these agreements, the rights of patients, and the implications of a recent case involving Dr. Timothy Vogel, a pediatric neurosurgeon. The conversation highlights the importance of legal counsel in navigating employment agreements and the enforceability of non-compete clauses.
Takeaways
- Non-competes are often negotiated and rarely go to trial.
- Restrictive covenants can include non-solicitation and confidentiality clauses.
- Patients have the right to choose their treating physician, even if a non-compete exists.
- Courts generally respect the doctor-patient relationship in these cases.
- The enforceability of non-compete agreements varies by state and circumstance.
- Legal counsel is crucial when signing employment agreements in healthcare.
- Many physicians mistakenly believe non-compete agreements are unenforceable.
- The geographic scope of non-compete agreements must be reasonable.
- Blue penciling allows courts to modify overly broad agreements.
- The credibility of witnesses can significantly impact trial outcomes.
Todavía no hay opiniones