Episode 170: Gary Knight (The Stringer Film)

The Stringer Documentary & the Napalm Girl Mystery – A Deep Dive into Photojournalism Controversy Published on 10 Frames Per Second Blog – Your go‑to source for photojournalism insight Table of Contents What Is The Stringer?Meet the Key Players – Gary Knight & Bao NguyenWhy the Napalm Girl Photo MattersForensic Evidence: The Road‑Testing of the Iconic ShotIndustry Reaction – Backlash, Bans, and the “Wagon‑Circling” CultureThe Hidden History of Vietnamese & Local Freelance PhotographersHow to Watch The Stringer and Join the ConversationTakeaway: What This Means for Photojournalism Today 1. What Is The Stringer? The Stringer is a newly released documentary (Netflix, 2024) that investigates the authorship of the world‑famous “Napalm Girl” photograph taken in Vietnam, 1972. Core premise: The film follows journalist Gary Knight and director Bao Nguyen as they trace a decades‑old secret held by a Vietnamese stringer‑photographer, Nguyễn Thành Nghệ (Wintan Nei).Format: A blend of on‑the‑ground interviews, archival footage, and forensic road‑testing that reconstructs the exact location, timing, and line‑of‑sight of the iconic image. Why it matters: The image is one of the most published photographs in history and is universally credited to Associated Press staff photographer Nick Ut. The documentary questions that credit, shaking a cornerstone of photojournalistic mythology. 2. Meet the Key Players – Gary Knight & Bao Nguyen PersonRoleWhy They’re ImportantGary KnightFounder of the VII Foundation, mentor, and documentary “connective tissue.”Provides insider knowledge of the photojournalism world, contacts, and credibility that anchors the investigation.Bao NguyenDirector of The StringerChose to frame the story as a journey, not just a series of talking‑heads, and insisted on a central narrator (Gary) to guide viewers.Carl RobinsonFormer AP Vietnamese‑language photo editor (local hire).His 2022 email sparked the whole investigation; his memories and documents are a primary source.Horst FassSenior AP photographer in Vietnam (the “gatekeeper” of the image).His decision to run the picture on the wire is central to the credit controversy.Nguyễn Thành Nghệ (Wintan Nei)Vietnamese stringer who claimed to have taken the shot.The film’s “secret” – his testimony and forensic evidence challenge the accepted narrative.Nick UtAP staff photographer historically credited for the photo.The focal point of the debate; his name appears on every caption of the image. 3. Why the Napalm Girl Photo Matters Iconic status: Frequently cited in textbooks, museums, and peace‑activist campaigns.Cultural impact: Symbolizes the horrors of the Vietnam War and the power of visual storytelling.Professional legacy: The credit has shaped career trajectories, awards (Pulitzer, etc.), and AP’s brand. If the credit shifts, we must reconsider how many other war‑zone images were attributed, potentially rewriting a large part of photojournalism history. 4. Forensic Evidence: The Road‑Testing of the Iconic Shot The documentary’s most compelling section is the road‑forensics – a scientific recreation of the moment the photo was taken. Methodology: Researchers drove the exact route described by Wintan Nei, measuring distances, angles, and terrain features.Key Findings: Line‑of‑sight analysis shows the photographer would have been ~150 meters from the burning road—far beyond the reach of a 35 mm lens used by Ut.Shadow & lighting study matches the sun angle on July 29, 1972, which aligns with Wintan Nei’s timeline, not Ut’s.Camera metadata (Pentax vs. Nikon) – expert testimony confirms Ut’s camera was not a Pentax, the model allegedly used by Wintan Nei. Independent verification: World Press Photo hired a former Bellingcat investigator, and INDEX a Paris-based research group.French photographer Tristan da Cunha corroborated the forensic report. Cunha also worked with AD Coleman on his Robert Capa investigation (Ep. 35) These data points form the strongest case in the film that Nick Ut did not take the photograph. 5. Industry Reaction – Backlash, Bans, and the “Wagon‑Circling” Culture Immediate pushback: Numerous journalists launched letter‑writing campaigns to film festivals and employers, asking for the documentary to be removed.Attempted bans: Some media outlets threatened to fire staff who publicly supported the film.Defensive stance: Many veteran photographers argued that the film attacks “iconic” heroes and undermines the profession’s reputation. Key quote from Gary Knight: “Journalists don’t ban books or films they haven’t read. Our job is to investigate, not to protect mythologies.” The controversy illustrates the “wagon‑circling” phenomenon—protecting revered figures at the expense of truth. 6. The Hidden History of Vietnamese & Local Freelance Photographers The documentary ...