Episode 162: Is the NBA Cup a Gimmick or an Innovation?
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Solo puedes tener X títulos en el carrito para realizar el pago.
Add to Cart failed.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Por favor intenta de nuevo
Error al seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
In this episode of The 40/40 Vision podcast, hosts Khaled Abdallah and Naufil Mulla delve into the NBA Cup, discussing its pros and cons, the timing of the tournament, its competition format, and the overall impact on player performance and fan engagement.
They explore the criticisms surrounding the NBA Cup, including its perceived gimmicky nature and the challenges of maintaining viewer interest. The conversation also touches on the aesthetics of the tournament, the implications of a single elimination format, and suggestions for improving the NBA Cup to enhance its significance in the basketball landscape.
Takeaways
- The NBA Cup is seen as gimmicky by some purists.
- Timing of the NBA Cup may be too early in the season.
- The competition format has a small sample size issue
- Aesthetics of the NBA Cup courts are criticized.
- Players may not perform at their best due to the early season intensity.
- The NBA Cup aims to manufacture urgency for fans.
- Single elimination format can create excitement and unpredictability.
- Improving fan engagement is crucial for the NBA Cup's success.
- The NBA Cup could benefit from being hosted at home stadiums.
- Financial incentives may motivate players to perform better.
Todavía no hay opiniones