When Steve Hopper received an unexpected call from an attorney thirteen years ago, he never imagined it would lead to a second career spanning over 55 cases as an expert witness in warehousing and logistics. Initially skeptical about expert witnessing due to negative media portrayals, Hopper discovered the critical importance of bringing specialized knowledge to judges and juries navigating complex technical issues.

Perhaps most valuable is Hopper's perspective on ethics in expert testimony. "I'm not an advocate for your side of the case," he explains. "It's not my job. You're the advocate, I'm not the advocate." This commitment to factual accuracy has occasionally led him to withdraw from cases where attorneys pressured him to offer opinions he considered unsupported. For professionals in any field considering expert witness work, Hopper's experience provides a roadmap for maintaining integrity while delivering effective testimony.

Considering sharing your expertise in the courtroom? Listen now to discover the realities of expert witnessing from someone who's navigated its challenges for over a decade.

When medical technology and legal expertise intersect, Dr. Linda van Roosmalen stands at that fascinating crossroads. Our conversation dives deep into her journey from university research lab to courtroom expert witness in the specialized field of wheelchair transportation safety.

Dr. van Roosmalen pulls back the curtain on the ethical backbone of expert witnessing. She recounts refusing to alter her professional opinion despite attorney pressure, explaining why integrity isn't just morally right—it's professionally essential. "At all costs, you have to be extremely honest in your opinions," she insists, noting how past statements can return in future cases, making consistency crucial for credibility.

The practical challenges of balancing expert work alongside a full-time career emerge as we explore her methodical approach to case management. Using specialized software to track hours across multiple cases that often span years, she maintains strict separation between her primary field and expert witness specialty to avoid conflicts of interest. Her flexibility—taking calls after hours or on weekends—reveals how modern professionals can successfully maintain dual careers.

Want to learn how expert witnesses can strengthen your case? Contact Round Table Group today and discover why finding the right expertise makes all the difference in complex litigation.

Ever wondered what happens when economics meets the courtroom? Dr. Philip Cross pulls back the curtain on the fascinating world of economic expert witnessing with refreshing candor and practical wisdom.

After earning his PhD from the University of Wisconsin and teaching at Georgetown University, Dr. Cross transitioned through major consulting firms before founding his own successful practice. His journey reveals a counterintuitive truth: authenticity trumps polish in the expert witness business. "I've kind of unlearned over the years to try to be slick and professional," he explains. "I'm just myself."

The conversation explores the delicate balancing act economic experts must perform – applying economic expertise across diverse industries without overstepping boundaries, managing different attorney styles from micromanagers to completely hands-off, and navigating the stark differences between plaintiff and defense work. Dr. Cross maintains a deliberate mix of both to protect his credibility.

Perhaps most illuminating is Dr. Cross's perspective on what makes attorney-expert relationships work: clear communication, appropriate boundaries between experts and end clients, and mutual respect for each other's expertise. Whether you're a practicing attorney, aspiring expert witness, or simply curious about how economic analysis shapes legal outcomes, this conversation offers an unvarnished look at a profession few truly understand.