Delaying Decisions to Avoid SFAIRP

In this episode of Risk! Engineers Talk Governance, due diligence engineers Richard Robinson and Gaye Francis discuss Delaying Decisions to avoid SFAIRP (So Far As Is Reasonably Practicable).

Their conversation covers:

• if lack of a decision is the result of ignorance and poor governance rather than deliberate strategy
• how the elimination option often gets tested far too late in the design process
• why briefing board members and their legal counsel on WHS legislation obligations is often what finally moves the needle
• the example the case of the Port of Auckland's Chief Executive serve as a reminder that commercial priorities don't shield senior decision makers from criminal consequences
• if you're going to delay or decline a safety decision, you must document your reasoning thoroughly, revisit it regularly as circumstances change, and understand that sitting on a decision is itself a courageous choice.

If you’d like us to cover a specific topic or have any feedback we’d love to hear from you. Email [e-mail].

For further information on Richard and Gaye’s consulting work with R2A, head to https://www.r2a.com.au, where you’ll also find their booklets (store) and a sign-up for their quarterly newsletter to keep informed of their latest news and events.

Gaye is also founder of Australian women’s safety workwear company Apto PPE https://www.aptoppe.com.au.