Compliance Perspectives Podcast Por SCCE arte de portada

Compliance Perspectives

Compliance Perspectives

De: SCCE
Escúchala gratis

OFERTA POR TIEMPO LIMITADO. Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes. Obtén esta oferta.
An SCCE PodcastSociety of Corporate Compliance & Ethics Economía Gestión Gestión y Liderazgo
Episodios
  • Kristy Grant-Hart on Due Diligence Questionnaires [Podcast]

    Kristy Grant-Hart on Due Diligence Questionnaires [Podcast]
    Oct 7 2025
    By Adam Turteltaub Why? Why are you asking that? Do you really need to know it? Is it going to tell you something you need to know? Is it a question that anyone could even answer? All of these are questions to ask yourselves and colleagues when they propose adding an item to your due diligence questionnaire. As Kristy Grant-Hart (LinkedIn), author, speaker and Head of Advisory at Spark Compliance, which is now owned by Diligent, explains, too often due diligence questionnaires are filled with questions that are unnecessary at best and counterproductive at worst. They are born out a desire to cover all the bases not necessarily get you just the information you need. Instead of throwing in everything including the kitchen sink, it’s far better to take, as elsewhere, a risk-based approach. Work directly with those who own the risk review. And, if the response doesn’t matter, don’t ask the question. Listen in to learn more about how to create a due diligence questionnaire that gets the answers you need, and not the ones you don’t.
    Más Menos
    11 m
  • Vera Cherepanova on Governance and Compliance [Podcast]

    Vera Cherepanova on Governance and Compliance [Podcast]
    Oct 2 2025
    By Adam Turteltaub With ever more attention paid to the role of boards in overseeing compliance, the question naturally comes up: Do boards even understand what makes for an effective compliance program? To help answer that question we spoke with Vera Cherepanova (LinkedIn), Executive Director of the non-profit Boards of the Future. She shares the unfortunate news that many boards are not where they should be. They are not fully seeing culture as a risk factor and driver of misconduct. Nor do many understand their own duty to manage it. That’s dangerous in these times, especially now that governments are paying closer attention to culture. Forces, though, are starting to change the equation and force boards to understand the role they and compliance play together in ensuring both integrity within the company and business success. Supply chain issues and ESG, for example, have brough compliance in closer contact with the governing authority. So, too, is regionalization. As countries take divergent paths into more and more issues, the compliance team will be essential in helping the board understand the risks that they face. More, though, will need to be done. Boards need to start addressing issues such as values conflicts like they do other risks. And, more people with compliance experience should be added to boards. Listen in to learn more about what boards are and are not doing.
    Más Menos
    15 m
  • Ed White on Value-Based Care [Podcast]

    Ed White on Value-Based Care [Podcast]
    Sep 30 2025
    By Adam Turteltaub With a rising focus on value-based care, and a new program seeking to make the approach mandatory, we spoke with Ed White (LinkedIn), Partner at Nelson Mullins. Previous efforts to move toward value-based models, such as Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), faced significant barriers due to regulatory frameworks like the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute. These laws were designed to prevent financial incentives from influencing medical decisions, but they also limited the ability of hospitals and physicians to collaborate in ways necessary for effective value-based care implementation. Recognizing these constraints, CMS and the Office of Inspector General (OIG) collaborated in 2020 to issue new regulations aimed at facilitating the transition to value-based care. The next step in the transition is the new Transforming Episode Accountability Model or TEAM program, which will become mandatory in 2026. This program includes 740 hospitals across the country and targets five specific surgical procedures. Participating hospitals must coordinate care with a range of providers—including specialists, primary care physicians, labs, durable medical equipment (DME) providers, hospice agencies, and others. The TEAM program is designed to last for five years, during which time hospitals are responsible for ensuring that patients are connected to appropriate post-discharge care, including follow-up with primary care providers. The goal is to reduce complications, avoid emergency room readmissions, and promote better health outcomes—all while keeping costs below a CMS-established target price. To drive efficiency, the TEAM program introduces three financial risk “tracks”: Upside-only track – Hospitals can earn shared savings if costs come in below the target price. Moderate risk (upside/downside) track – Hospitals can either earn savings or incur penalties depending on performance. Full-risk track – This track will offer both greater risks and rewards. According to industry consultants, two-thirds of participating hospitals are expected to lose money in the early phases of the TEAM program. Hospitals must rethink their compliance, care coordination, and partnership strategies in the wake of these changes. Listen in to learn more about what this all means for your compliance program both today and in the future.
    Más Menos
    16 m
Todavía no hay opiniones