Chapter 94- Part C: Rectal Tears, Dehiscence, and the Suture Lie
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
In this BoardsCast episode, we continue Tobias Chapter 94 — Rectum, Anus, and Perineum by confronting the most dangerous belief in rectal repair:
“If the sutures hold, the repair holds.”
That’s the suture lie.
Rectal failures are usually not knot failures — they’re biology failures inside a rigid pelvic cage, where three forces decide whether the patient survives:
contamination + tension + perfusion.
This episode builds the board-level failure framework for why rectal repairs can look stable in the OR, then dehisce in the post-op day 3–5 window when tissue strength drops, swelling peaks, and tenesmus turns a “tension-free” repair into a strangled one.
You’ll learn:
- Why rectal tears are inoculation events (anaerobes + contamination drive rapid failure)
- Why pelvic anatomy creates hidden tension after anesthesia wears off (tone + edema + straining)
- Why “pink” is a trap: perfusion can be compromised even when tissue looks viable
- The predictable dehiscence timeline: microleak → inflammation → edema → perfusion loss → necrosis
- The board pattern: day 3–5 decline = septic dehiscence until proven otherwise
- Prevention priorities that actually move outcomes: source control, true tension-free repair, protect blood supply, and aggressive post-op straining control
If you remember one line: sutures don’t save ischemic tissue. Biology wins.
🎁 Simini Bonus
Claim your free sample of Simini Protect Lavage (just cover shipping):
https://www.simini.com/getstarted1620808454519
Listen On: Spotify | Apple Podcasts | Amazon Music