This audio-first cybersecurity course is built for busy professionals who need security that works in real environments, not just on slides. You’ll learn how to design monitoring, logging, SIEM, and SOAR operations that produce usable visibility, reduce noise, and support fast, defensible response. Along the way, you’ll connect technical controls to practical program execution: ownership, SLAs, governance, decision rights, and evidence that holds up during incidents and audits.

You’ll also strengthen your ability to explain risk in business terms and prioritize work using context like exposure, criticality, and exploit signals. The course is paired with a companion exam book for deeper reference and an eBook of 1,000 flashcards to reinforce key terms, decision rules, and operational tradeoffs—so you can retain what matters and apply it immediately at work.

This episode teaches how to include physical vulnerabilities in a security program, aligning with exam objectives that explicitly extend vulnerability management beyond purely technical software findings. You will learn how to assess risks across facilities, endpoints, server rooms, wiring closets, and critical environmental dependencies like power, cooling, and fire suppression, and why physical access often becomes system access through tampering, theft, or unauthorized connectivity. We cover best practices such as controlled entry, visitor management, secure storage and disposal, inventory discipline, and coordination with facilities teams so responsibilities are clear and controls are maintained. A scenario explores unauthorized access to a network closet that enables compromise, illustrating how physical controls, monitoring, and incident procedures must work together. Troubleshooting considerations include assumptions that facilities security is “someone else’s job,” weak documentation and evidence for audits, unmanaged devices that move between locations, and continuity plans that ignore environmental failure modes, reinforcing a holistic approach that leaders can govern and prove. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.

This episode explains how to drive remediation workflows that reliably close vulnerabilities and produce proof, a key exam concept because effective programs are judged by remediation outcomes, not discovery volume. You will learn how to assign single-point ownership for each finding, set SLAs that reflect exposure and exploitability, and use standardized ticketing fields that capture required context, affected assets, and acceptance criteria for closure. We cover exception handling with documented rationale, compensating controls, and expiration dates, along with the importance of verification evidence such as rescans, configuration confirmations, and behavioral validation that demonstrates the weakness is actually removed. A scenario follows a critical vulnerability requiring emergency change approval, showing how leaders coordinate teams, preserve service stability, and still meet risk-driven deadlines. Troubleshooting considerations include vague tickets that cause rework, backlog growth due to missing accountability, “fixed” findings that reopen due to weak verification, and reporting that hides SLA breaches, reinforcing disciplined workflow design and measurable performance. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.

This episode teaches how to prioritize vulnerabilities using context, which is central to exam performance because the certification expects you to rank work by real risk rather than by raw severity labels alone. You will learn how exposure captures reachability and attacker access paths, how criticality reflects business importance and dependency impact, and how exploit signals such as known exploitation, weaponization, and active scanning should accelerate remediation decisions. We cover building a simple prioritization matrix, integrating compensating controls when patching must be delayed, and coordinating with change management so urgent fixes happen safely and predictably. A scenario compares a high-severity internal finding against a lower-severity exposed finding and shows why context can reverse priority order, then explores how to communicate that decision to stakeholders without confusion. Troubleshooting considerations include missing asset context, inconsistent ownership, untracked exceptions, and teams that treat all vulnerabilities as equal, reinforcing the governance and measurement practices that keep prioritization disciplined and defensible. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.

This episode explains vulnerability management as a complete program that drives remediation and verification, which aligns with exam objectives that test whether leaders can move beyond scanning toward measurable risk reduction. You will learn the lifecycle from discovery through assessment, prioritization, remediation, and validation, and why asset inventory and ownership are prerequisites for meaningful progress. We cover setting scanning cadence, defining remediation SLAs based on exposure and criticality, tracking exceptions with compensating controls and review dates, and verifying fixes through rescans and configuration checks so “closed” means proven. A scenario explores a critical vulnerability on an internet-facing system and shows how prioritization, emergency change coordination, and evidence capture work together to reduce risk quickly. Troubleshooting considerations include endless backlogs due to missing owners, overreliance on severity scores without context, weak verification that allows regressions, and reporting that measures scan volume instead of closure and recurrence reduction. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.

This episode teaches how to defend security priorities using evidence, clear narratives, and explicit tradeoffs, aligning with exam objectives that test leadership communication and the ability to secure resources and agreement. You will learn how to select metrics that reflect outcomes such as reduced exposure, faster detection and containment, improved control coverage, and lower recurrence, then combine those metrics with concise narratives that connect threats and business impact to proposed actions. We cover best practices for presenting options at different cost levels, stating what will be deferred if resources are limited, and keeping decision briefs focused on what leaders must decide rather than flooding them with technical detail. Scenarios include defending a prioritized backlog during budget pressure and responding to challenges about return on investment by tying evidence to business risk reduction. Troubleshooting considerations include vanity metrics, inconsistent measurement definitions, and presentations that hide uncertainty or exaggerate certainty, reinforcing credibility as the most important currency for sustained support. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.

This episode explains how to apply risk techniques that make decisions consistent and auditable, an exam-relevant skill because leaders must demonstrate disciplined treatment choices and documentation habits. You will learn the four common treatment options, accept, mitigate, transfer, and avoid, and how to choose among them based on business tolerance, cost, feasibility, and time sensitivity. We cover how to maintain a risk register that is not just a list but a decision tool with owners, due dates, review cadence, and clear rationale, along with how to document risk acceptance so leadership intent is explicit and conditions for re-evaluation are defined. Examples include accepting risk temporarily with compensating controls and expiration, transferring risk through contractual terms while retaining oversight, and escalating risks that exceed appetite with options leadership can decide among. Troubleshooting considerations include stale registers, undocumented assumptions, and inconsistent treatment logic that undermines trust, emphasizing repeatable practices that withstand audits and incident reviews. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.

This episode teaches how to adopt security frameworks to mature a program while avoiding checkbox compliance, which aligns with exam objectives that emphasize both structured improvement and practical execution. You will learn what frameworks provide, such as organized coverage of capabilities and a shared language for gaps, and how to choose a framework that fits industry expectations, business goals, and current maturity rather than forcing an ill-fitting model. We cover how to use frameworks to build roadmaps, prioritize improvements, and measure progress through evidence and outcomes, not just documentation volume. Practical examples include mapping existing controls to framework functions to identify gaps, selecting a small set of priority improvements that reduce real risk, and using periodic reviews to keep alignment current as systems and threats evolve. Troubleshooting considerations include over-documentation that drains resources, “framework theater” driven by audits rather than risk, and siloed adoption that produces conflicting implementations, highlighting governance patterns that keep framework work productive and defensible. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.