Jonathon Wells, in his book Zombie Science, wrote:

… the central dogma continues to mislead scientists and non-scientists alike. True, some DNA sequences encode some RNAs, and some RNA sequences encode proteins, but in general the central dogma is false. DNA does not contain the genetic program for an organism, and DNA is far from being the secret of life. Continued faith in it is rooted in materialism.

The fault doesn't lie with our genes, but with zombie science.

What does zombie science mean?

Tag words: Jonathon Wells; Zombie Science; DNA; RNA; proteins; central dogma; Stephen Meyer; The Return of the God Hypothesis; John Lennox; God’s Undertaker; What is Science?; Nicolaus Copernicus; Galileo Galilei; Francesco Redi; Louis Pasteur; Intelligent design; ID; God; Peter Ridd; Reef Heresy; just cause corruption; George Klein; Richard Lewontin; Edward Larsen; Larry Witham; Professor Leuba; Allan Sandage; Anthony Flew; Owen Gingerich; Dean Kenyon; Biochemical Predestination; Francis Crick; Jack Szostak;

The childlike simplicity offered by some of the evolutionary scientists about DNA and the characteristics people have because of having a certain type of gene, is becoming clearly an illusion. But it’s one that’s still promoted.

John Lennox, in his book God’s Undertaker, tells us: Indeed for many years molecular biologists have regarded it as a 'central dogma', as Francis Crick called it, that the genome accounts completely for an organism's inherited characteristics. This inevitably fuelled the kind of biodeterminism that held individual genes responsible for a whole variety not only of human diseases but also of all manner of characteristics from predisposition to violence or obesity - to mathematical ability.

….

However, evidence is rapidly mounting that this is very unlikely to be the case. it is now evident that a large collection of genes may be involved in any one particular trait or function — their correspondence is many-to-one rather than one-to-one.

Want to know about the gay gene?

Tag words: DNA; John Lennox; God’s Undertaker; central dogma; Francis Crick; biodeterminism;Jennifer Doudna; Jack Szostak; Watson and Crick; Walter Isaacson; The Code Breaker; proteins; origin of life; Anthony Flew; Follow the evidence wherever it leads; protocell; Jonathon Wells; Zombie Science; ribosome; gay gene;

Those oh so primitive views of life that the scientists of Darwin’s day had, had gradually evolved, yes that’s the right word, to the point where it was about to tell the world that life had emerged from matter – and that God didn’t matter! Oh happy day.

Tag words: God; DNA; RNA; Elliot Volkin; Lazarus Astrachan; Jonathon Wells; Zombie Science; atheist scientists; Francois Jacob; Jacques Monod; ribosomes; Nietzsche; God is dead; Richard Dawkins; The Selfish Gene; Stephen Meyer; The Return of the God Hypotheses; Ernst Haeckel; T. H. Huxley; protoplasm; Aleksandr I. Oparin; Stanley Miller; Walter Isaacson; Jennifer Doudna; The Code Breaker; Human Genome Project; Francis Crick; central dogma; Thomas Cech; Sidney Altman; Jack Szostak;

From 1835, when Charles Darwin was travelling around the world on HMS Beagle, and then from 1842 when he put pen to paper to outline his theory, up until 1859 when he finally published his book, On the Origin of Species the two most important scientific developments that he really needed to know about, wouldn’t happen for over another 90 years. Materialist scientists, atheist, saw those developments as decisively ending all of this nonsense about God, but were they getting ahead of themselves?

Tag words: Charles Darwin; HMS Beagle; On the Origin of Species; atheist; God; Rosalind Franklin; Watson and Crick; Nobel Prize; DNA; Linus Pauling; Maurice Wilkins; Walter Isaacson; The Code Breaker; Jennifer Doudna; Peter Pauling; photograph 51; Claude Shannon; Alan Turing; President Bill Clinton; Galileo; Sir Isaac Newton; human genome; Theory of Evolution; Jonathon Wells; Zombie Science; RNA; sequence hypothesis; central dogma;

Stephen Meyer, in his book, The Return of the God Hypotheses wrote:

By the late 1960s, molecular biologists knew where the information for building proteins was stored and even how that information was used to build them. But they did not know where that information came from. I call this mystery "the DNA enigma," a mystery that is closely related to the question of how the first life on earth originated.

And later in his book he wrote:

I came across a book written by Henry Quastler, one of the early scientists who first began to apply informational concepts to molecular biology. In it, Quastler made an almost offhand and seemingly obvious observation. As he put it, "The creation of new information is habitually associated with conscious activity."

From this part, I’m going to explore the DNA enigma. Where did the information, the instructions, about how to build proteins, come from and did science find itself walking down a path that was leading it, especially with enormous reluctance on the part of the atheist scientists, to God?

I’m going to tell you the amazing story of how Watson and Crick, the winners of the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine in 1962 for, in the words of the award: their discoveries concerning the molecular structure of nucleic acids and its significance for information transfer in living material. And how they shafted their colleague, Rosalind Russell, to do it.

After General Montgomery won his historic victory at the Battle of El Alamein in 1942 Winston Churchill made one of his memorable speeches:

'This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is perhaps the end of the beginning.'

The remarkable story of information had well and truly begun – but terrifyingly the quest for where it came from, seemed to leading to the door of the most high God who many scientists and philosophers said was a figment of people’s imaginations. How could a figment of the imagination of a deluded Christian be the source of information for living things?

Tag words: Stephen Meyer; The Return of the God Hypotheses; Henry Quastler; DNA enigma; atheist; God; Watson and Crick; John Lennox; Gods’ Undertaker; matter before mind; Mind before matter;Socrates; Charles Darwin; Walter Isaacson; The Code Breaker; Theory of Evolution; , Jonathon Wells; Zombie Science; Gregor Mendel; On the Origin of Species; Marxists; William Bateson; genetics; Wilhelm Johannsen; gene; pangene; chromosomes; materialism; nucleotides; Linus Pauling; Rosalind Franklin; The Double Helix;

Richard Dawkins, in his 1986 book, The Blind Watchmaker wrote:

What lies at the heart of every living thing is not a fire, not warm breath, not a 'spark of life'. It is information, words, instructions. If you want a metaphor, don't think of fires and sparks and breath. Think, instead, of a billion discrete, digital characters carved in tablets of crystal. If you want to understand life, don't think about vibrant, throbbing gels and oozes, think about information technology.

Here Richard dismisses the idea that the creation of life could be the work of God. But is the dismissal of that idea scientific or based on the unscientific worldview of Richard Dawkins? That is what we need to explore.

But there is one take away from this – both atheists and Judaeo Christians accept that information is the key to life – and the big question is where did the information come from.

Tag words: Richard Dawkins; The Blind Watchmaker; information; Word of God; Moses; Torah; John Lennox; God’s Undertaker; Aristotle; Bill Bryson; The Body – A Guide for Occupants; Eva Bianconi; DNA; RNA; Professor DMS Watson; Stephen Meyer; The Return of the God Hypothesis; Francis Crick; Elliott Sober; Professor Ridd; CP Snow; Sir Isaac Newton; Albert Einstein;

Evolutionary biologists. Did you know that sometimes even Homer nods? That’s an expression my amazing high school teacher used to say. I don’t think it’s a common expression today. So let me explain it to you.

Tag words: Darwinism; Theory of Evolution; The Return of the God Hypothesis; Stephen Myer; DNA; RNA; proteins; Neo-Darwinists; John Lennox; God’s Undertaker; Bill Gates; Stephen Jay Gould; Jonathon Wells; Zombie Science; Icons of Evolution; Massimo Pigliucci; the Altenberg 16; Richard Lewontin; Jerry Fodor; Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini; Intelligent Design; Creationism; James Shapiro; Richard Dawkins; The Blind Watchmaker; God; Denis Noble; Raju Pookottil; The Third Way of Evolution; the Oxford 50; Clarence Williams; Gerd Müller; Stuart Newman; the survival of the fittest, but not the arrival of the fittest; Galapagos finches; Darwin's finches; HMS Beagle; Peter Grant; Rosemary Grant; information;

In 1999, the editor of the prestigious scientific magazine Nature, Henry Gee wrote "it is effectively impossible to link fossils into chains of cause and effect in any valid way. To take a line of fossils and claim that they represent a lineage is not a scientific hypothesis that can be tested, but an assertion that carries the same validity as a bedtime story — amusing, perhaps even instructive, but not scientific."

Tag words: Fossils; James Watson; Francis Crick; DNA; double helix; Charles Darwin; On the Origin of Species; Theory of Evolution; Stephen Myer; The Return of the God Hypothesis; Mathematical Challenges to the Neo-Darwinian Interpretation of Evolution; Wistar Institute in Philadelphia; novel protein structure; Murray Eden; John Lennox; God’s Undertaker; Stanley Ulam; Sir Peter Medawar; Ernst Mayr; Marcel-Paul Schützenberger; Fred Hoyle; microevolution; palaeontologists; Mark Ridley; David Raup; Field Museum of Natural History; Stephen Jay Gould; Niles Eldredge; Jonathon Wells; Zombie Science; Ronald Jenner; American Museum of Natural History; Gareth Nelson; Henry Gee;