Episodios

  • ''Orthogonalising' Copyright: Reclaiming lost culture and getting authors paid' - Rebecca Giblin: CIPIL Seminar
    Nov 24 2017
    Rebecca Giblin, Associate Professor of Law, Monash University Australia, spoke on the topic of "'Orthogonalising' Copyright: Reclaiming lost culture and getting authors paid" at a seminar on 16 November 2017. Dr Rebecca Giblin is an ARC Future Fellow and Associate Professor within Monash University's Law Faculty. During 2011 she was the Kernochan Visiting International Intellectual Property Scholar at Columbia Law School in New York, and in 2013 a Senior Visiting Scholar in residence at Berkeley. Dr Giblin has published widely in the areas of copyright, access to knowledge (A2K) and regulation of emerging technologies, including Code Wars (Edward Elgar, 2011) and What if we could reimagine copyright? (ANU Press, 2017). In addition to her ARC Future Fellowship project (introduced in this seminar, see also authorsinterest.org), Giblin is also the lead Chief Investigator of an ARC Linkage Project, working with legal, social and data science researchers, together with library partners in five jurisdictions, to understand the legal and social impacts of library e-lending. She tweets @rgibli. For more information see the CIPIL website at http://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk
    Más Menos
    55 m
  • 'A Career in Brand Management: Becoming A Trade Mark Attorney' - Patricia Collis: CIPIL Seminar
    Feb 18 2016
    Patricia Collis is a UK and European trade mark and design attorney at Bird & Bird in London. She has worked in the field of brand management for almost 10 years, and acted for some of the world’s largest brands. Prior to embarking on this career she studied for a law degree and then an LLM at the University of Cambridge. Patricia gave an evening seminar entitled "A Career in Brand Management: Becoming A Trade Mark Attorney" on Wednesday 17 February 2016 at the Faculty of Law as a guest of CIPIL (the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law). For more information see the CIPIL website at http://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk
    Más Menos
    48 m
  • 'A Counterintuitive Approach to the Interaction Between Trade marks and Freedom of Expression in Europe and the US: A Two-Way Relationship': CIPIL Evening seminar
    Mar 6 2024
    Speaker: Dr Alvaro Fernandez-Mora, KCL Abstract: As trade marks have evolved to perform an expressive function, courts and scholars on both sides of the Atlantic have devoted increased attention to elucidating when, and how, marks and speech interact. Three forms of interaction can be identified in European and US case law. First, in infringement litigation, a defendant can invoke speech with a view toward insulating from liability his unauthorized use of plaintiff’s mark for expressive purposes, usually for parody or commentary. Second, in trade mark registration, unsuccessful applicants can invoke speech to challenge the validity of a refusal of registration. And third, in constitutional challenges, a trade mark owner can invoke speech in seeking to strike down public measures encroaching on trade mark use. Regrettably, to date, commentators have had a tendency to focus on one form of interaction at a time, placing special emphasis on infringement cases. Their analyses and proposals for reform have privileged this form of interaction in an effort to avoid the severe repercussions that unbridled enforcement of trade mark rights could have on defendants’ speech. This has led to an impoverished understanding of the interaction between marks and speech, broadly considered. In the absence of comprehensive studies covering the diversity of instances where both sets of rights interact, conventional wisdom posits that their interaction is unidirectional, in the sense that trade mark rights chill expression. My ongoing research seeks to redress this misconception by engaging in a taxonomic analysis of the diverse scenarios in which marks and speech interact. Their joint study reveals that this interaction is best understood as a two-way street, where freedom of expression can simultaneously limit and validate trade mark rights. The proposed reconceptualization of the interaction between marks and speech can contribute significantly to the advancement of the field. Biography: Dr Alvaro Fernandez-Mora is a Lecturer in Intellectual Property Law at The Dickson Poon School of Law. Alvaro joined King's College London in 2024, having previously worked as a Lecturer in Law at the University of York (2021-2024). Alvaro has earned degrees from the University of Oxford (DPhil), Harvard Law School (LLM) and Universidad Pontificia Comillas de Madrid ICADE (LLB). Before pursuing his doctoral studies, Alvaro worked as an associate lawyer at Hogan Lovells LLP’s intellectual property litigation department in Madrid. Alvaro's research interests lie at the intersection between intellectual property law and other fields –notably human rights, competition law and economics–, often from a comparative perspective. Alvaro's work has been published in the Berkeley Journal of International Law (BJIL), the International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law (IIC) or the Intellectual Property Quarterly (IPQ). For more information see: https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/seminars-and-events/cipil-seminars
    Más Menos
    41 m
  • 'A Counterintuitive Approach to the Interaction Between Trade marks and Freedom of Expression in Europe and the US: A Two-Way Relationship': CIPIL Evening seminar (audio)
    Mar 6 2024
    Speaker: Dr Alvaro Fernandez-Mora, KCL Abstract: As trade marks have evolved to perform an expressive function, courts and scholars on both sides of the Atlantic have devoted increased attention to elucidating when, and how, marks and speech interact. Three forms of interaction can be identified in European and US case law. First, in infringement litigation, a defendant can invoke speech with a view toward insulating from liability his unauthorized use of plaintiff’s mark for expressive purposes, usually for parody or commentary. Second, in trade mark registration, unsuccessful applicants can invoke speech to challenge the validity of a refusal of registration. And third, in constitutional challenges, a trade mark owner can invoke speech in seeking to strike down public measures encroaching on trade mark use. Regrettably, to date, commentators have had a tendency to focus on one form of interaction at a time, placing special emphasis on infringement cases. Their analyses and proposals for reform have privileged this form of interaction in an effort to avoid the severe repercussions that unbridled enforcement of trade mark rights could have on defendants’ speech. This has led to an impoverished understanding of the interaction between marks and speech, broadly considered. In the absence of comprehensive studies covering the diversity of instances where both sets of rights interact, conventional wisdom posits that their interaction is unidirectional, in the sense that trade mark rights chill expression. My ongoing research seeks to redress this misconception by engaging in a taxonomic analysis of the diverse scenarios in which marks and speech interact. Their joint study reveals that this interaction is best understood as a two-way street, where freedom of expression can simultaneously limit and validate trade mark rights. The proposed reconceptualization of the interaction between marks and speech can contribute significantly to the advancement of the field. Biography: Dr Alvaro Fernandez-Mora is a Lecturer in Intellectual Property Law at The Dickson Poon School of Law. Alvaro joined King's College London in 2024, having previously worked as a Lecturer in Law at the University of York (2021-2024). Alvaro has earned degrees from the University of Oxford (DPhil), Harvard Law School (LLM) and Universidad Pontificia Comillas de Madrid ICADE (LLB). Before pursuing his doctoral studies, Alvaro worked as an associate lawyer at Hogan Lovells LLP’s intellectual property litigation department in Madrid. Alvaro's research interests lie at the intersection between intellectual property law and other fields –notably human rights, competition law and economics–, often from a comparative perspective. Alvaro's work has been published in the Berkeley Journal of International Law (BJIL), the International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law (IIC) or the Intellectual Property Quarterly (IPQ). For more information see: https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/seminars-and-events/cipil-seminars This entry provides an audio source for iTunes.
    Más Menos
    41 m
  • 'Algorithmic Fair Use' - Dan L Burk: CIPIL Seminar
    Nov 3 2017
    Dan L. Burk, Chancellor’s Professor of Law at the University of California, Irvine, spoke on the topic of 'Algorithmic Fair Use' at a seminar on 3 November 2017. Dan L. Burk is Chancellor’s Professor of Law at the University of California, Irvine, where he is a founding member of the law faculty. An internationally prominent authority on issues related to high technology, he lectures, teaches, and writes in the areas of patent, copyright, electronic commerce, and biotechnology law. He is the author of numerous papers on the legal and societal impact of new technologies, including articles on Internet regulation, on the structure of the patent system, and on the economic analysis of intellectual property law. He holds a B.S. in Microbiology (1985) from Brigham Young University, an M.S. in Molecular Biology and Biochemistry (1987) from Northwestern University, a J.D. (1990) from Arizona State University, and a J.S.M. (1994) from Stanford University. He has served as a legal advisor to a variety of private, governmental, and intergovernmental organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union Committee on Patent Policy and the OECD Committee on Consumer Protection. For more information see the CIPIL website at http://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk
    Más Menos
    1 h y 2 m
  • 'An Exception for Parody - A Common Concern in the Recent Copyright Consultation in UK and Hong Kong' - Alice Lee: CIPIL Seminar
    Dec 5 2013
    Professor Alice Lee, Associate Professor, Hong Kong University, gave a lunchtime seminar entitled "An Exception for Parody - A Common Concern in the Recent Copyright Consultation in UK and Hong Kong" on Thursday 5 December 2013 at the Faculty of Law as a guest of CIPIL (the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law). Alice Lee specializes in property/land law and intellectual property law. Her academic interests also extend to legal bilingualism. She has taught undergraduate and postgraduate students at HKU, students from Tsinghua University and Santa Clara University, as well as Hong Kong civil servants. In recognition of her excellence in teaching, she was awarded the title "University Teaching Fellow" in November 1999. She is a contributing author of the LexisNexis looseleaf publication Intellectual Property Rights: Hong Kong SAR and PRC (with Michael Pendleton and Jared Margolis). For more information see the CIPIL website at http://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk
    Más Menos
    33 m
  • 'Assessing Data Privacy Laws after 50 Years of Global Enactment' - Graham Greenleaf: CIPIL Seminar
    Oct 18 2019
    Professor Graham Greenleaf of UNSW, spoke on the topic of "Assessing Data Privacy Laws after 50 Years of Global Enactment" at a seminar on 17 October 2019. It is (almost) 50 years since the first recognisable data privacy law was enacted in Hesse, Germany. Now there are 136 countries with data privacy laws, in all regions of the world but one, and multiple international agreements. How do we make sense of, and assess, the first half-century of these global legal developments? Such a task requires that we ask (i) how do we determine what privacy principles these laws embody, to enable global comparisons?; (ii) how is the enforcement of such laws to be assessed?; (iii) how do we measure the effectiveness of data privacy laws in 2020 (rather than 1970)?; and even (iv) what are the objective functions of data privacy laws? This presentation will examine what is involved in asking and answering these questions. For more information see the CIPIL website at http://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk
    Más Menos
    46 m
  • 'Behind the Steele Curtain: An Empirical Study of Trademark Conflicts Law, 1952-2016' - Tim Dornis: CIPIL Seminar
    May 23 2017
    Tim Dornis, Leuphana Law School, spoke on the topic of "Behind the Steele Curtain: An Empirical Study of Trademark Conflicts Law, 1952-2016" at a seminar on 18 May 2017. Tim W. Dornis is a professor of law at Leuphana Law School (Lüneburg, Germany). He studied law and economics in Germany (Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen) and in the United States (Columbia University, LL.M. (James Kent Scholar) and Stanford Law School, J.S.M.). Before joining Leuphana’s faculty, Tim spent several years practicing in an international law firm and as a civil-law judge in Germany. He was also a Hauser Global Fellow at New York University School of Law. His habilitation thesis (University of Zurich, Switzerland) has been published by Cambridge University Press under the title Trademark and Unfair Competition Conflicts: Historical-Comparative, Doctrinal, and Economic Perspectives. For more information see the CIPIL website at http://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk
    Más Menos
    1 h y 25 m