Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes

Resumen del Editor

June Grasso speaks with prominent attorneys and scholars, analyzing legal issues and cases in the news.

2025 iHeartMedia, Inc. © Any use of this intellectual property for text and data mining or computational analysis including as training material for artificial intelligence systems is strictly prohibited without express written consent from iHeartMedia
Episodios
  • This Week at the Supreme Court
    Dec 14 2025

    June Grasso talks to legal experts about the top Supreme Court stories of the week

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Más Menos
    38 m
  • SCOTUS on Suits Against Investment Firms & Death Penalty
    Dec 13 2025

    Securities law expert James Park, a professor at UCLA Law School, discusses Supreme Court oral arguments over whether to let investors use an 85-year-old law to sue funds over their management decisions. Then death penalty litigation expert Andrea Lyon, of the Chicago firm of Lyon & Kerr, discusses Supreme Court oral arguments over the death penalty in cases of intellectual disabilities. June Grasso hosts.

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Más Menos
    28 m
  • Campaign Finance Caps & Who Gets the Dog?
    Dec 12 2025

    Elections expert Richard Briffault, a professor at Columbia Law School, discusses the Supreme Court oral arguments over Republican efforts to get rid of federal caps on spending by political parties in coordination with candidates. Then Jennifer Kay, Bloomberg Law senior correspondent, discusses a custody battle over a goldendoodle. June Grasso hosts.

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Más Menos
    37 m
Todas las estrellas
Más relevante
It's rare to find daily podcasts in the legal news world so 2 stars at a minimum for content generation.

With that said, the podcast is extremely biased and should be fact checked as you listen. Only one side is included in stories. For example, only Hamas figures are reported in the Israeli war with no combatant figures; similar with Israeli viewpoints on specific events. Harsh criticism for recusals at the supreme court is consistently presented (even over a stupid flag for a whole episode) but no coverage for actual conflicts (judicial political donations against defendants).

The podcast fits in a mold like CNN. Yes, there's news. You just have to do research to get all of it and know your listening to an editorial board.

Good for news but very biased

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.