Billy Wilder: Solving Problems Through Systematic Revision

Send us a text

Hollywood, 1949. Billy Wilder sits at a desk with his writing partner Charles Brackett, staring at 147 pages of the screenplay for Sunset Boulevard. They've been working on it for eight months. This is the nineteenth draft.

The problem is the third act. They know the problem is in the third act because Wilder has a rule posted on his office wall: "If you have a problem with the third act, the real problem is in the first act."

So they go back to page one. Again.

When Sunset Boulevard premiered in 1950, audiences watched a dead man narrate his own story, leading to one of cinema's most famous endings. The structure seems effortless. It wasn't. It was engineered through systematic revision over months, following specific principles Wilder had developed and refined across two decades.

Over 50 years, Billy Wilder wrote and directed 60 films using the same method. He never filmed a script until he'd solved every structural problem in writing. He revised obsessively, sometimes 20, 30 drafts before shooting. He had explicit rules about storytelling that he followed systematically and taught to others.

We have the drafts. We have his rules written on cards and posted in his office. We have Cameron Crowe's book-length interview where Wilder explains his method in detail. We have accounts from his writing partners, Charles Brackett for 13 films, then I.A.L. Diamond for 12 more, describing exactly how he worked.

This episode examines Wilder's systematic revision method. His approach started with "structure before dialogue," he designed complete narrative frameworks before writing a single line of speech. Early drafts were structural outlines showing what happens in every scene, in what order, and why. No dialogue. Just structure.

His explicit rules functioned as diagnostic tools. "The audience is fickle." "Grab 'em by the throat and never let 'em go." "If you have a problem with the third act, the real problem is in the first act." These weren't vague inspiration, they were systematic checks for finding what's broken.

His writing partnerships with Brackett and Diamond were strategic. Two people revising together see problems one person misses. The collaboration made systematic revision more effective. They'd outline entire films on index cards, arrange and rearrange them, test the structure systematically before writing dialogue.

Production accounts confirm this was genuinely his method. Jack Lemmon described receiving the shooting script, Wilder didn't change dialogue on set. He didn't discover the film while making it. Every word was tested through revision before filming began. The systematic approach solved filmmaking problems in the writing rather than during production.

No speculation about spontaneous wit. No romanticizing his process. Just the documented choices of someone who proved complex problems are solved through systematic iteration, not inspiration, and the framework those choices reveal for anyone who needs to solve structural problems before executing.