Episodios

  • Annie Farmer And Her Testimony During The Ghislaine Maxwell Trial
    Jul 30 2025
    Annie Farmer testified during Ghislaine Maxwell’s federal trial that she was just 16 years old when Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein flew her to Epstein’s ranch in New Mexico under the guise of an academic retreat. Farmer explained that she initially believed the trip was meant to provide her with educational and career opportunities. Instead, she said the experience quickly turned uncomfortable and exploitative. She recalled Maxwell giving her a massage during which Maxwell touched her breasts, an incident that left her feeling frozen and terrified. She also testified that Epstein had climbed into her bed unexpectedly and caressed her without consent. Farmer described feeling "panicked" and manipulated by two adults who had promised mentorship and safety.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    47 m
  • Jeffrey Epstein's 40th Birthday And The Song That Was Composed On Ghislaine Maxwell's Order
    Jul 30 2025
    Ghislaine Maxwell reportedly commissioned a British songwriter, Christopher Mason, to craft a bespoke birthday song for Jeffrey Epstein’s 40th birthday around January 1993. Maxwell is said to have dictated highly specific lyrics that praised Epstein for having “24‑hour erections” and referenced “schoolgirl crushes” he allegedly received while teaching at the Dalton School. The tone was deliberately crude and salacious, intended as a personalized roast-style tribute delivered at an intimate dinner attended by wealthy and powerful men, including Epstein and Leslie Wexner.

    Accounts detail how Maxwell strictly controlled the creative process—limiting Mason to working exclusively with her and forbidding contact with others to gather background. In what Christopher Mason described as a surreal performance, he entered a drawing room mid-party dressed in Epstein’s karate uniform and sang the bawdy, insult‑laden number a cappella. The song reportedly elicited laughter and applause from the elite audience. Mason later reflected that Maxwell's detailed direction was chilling in its prescience—highlighting behaviors and allegations that would become central to the Epstein scandal decades later.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

    Source:


    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12235042/ghislaine-maxwell-jeffrey-epstein-24-hour-erections/
    Más Menos
    19 m
  • In Their Own Words: My Interview With Maria Farmer (March 2022)
    Jul 30 2025
    Maria Farmer is an American visual artist who rose to public attention not for her artwork initially, but for being among the first whistleblowers to alert authorities about Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. In 1996, while working for Epstein and Maxwell in New York, she was allegedly sexually assaulted by both. She went on to submit what is recognized as the first criminal complaint to the New York City Police Department and the FBI—a warning that would unfortunately go unheeded for years.


    Over the years Farmer has reemerged as a powerful advocate for survivors of Epstein’s exploitation. She filed an affidavit in federal court in 2019 supporting Virginia Giuffre’s defamation lawsuit, and in 2025, she sued the federal government for failing to act on her decades-old report. She has also publicly recounted a disturbing 1995 encounter with Donald Trump in Epstein’s Manhattan office, which she urged investigators to include in their probe of Epstein’s social circle.


    In this episode, we’re going back to March of 2022 for a conversation that’s as raw and revealing now as it was then—my interview with Maria Farmer. At the time, Maria was one of the only survivors publicly speaking out against the full machinery that protected Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She didn’t just name names—she challenged institutions, exposed failures, and pulled the curtain back on a cover-up that reached into finance, intelligence, and politics. This interview captures Maria at her most unfiltered, recounting her experiences, her warnings to the FBI that were ignored, and her insight into how deep the rot really goes.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    1 h y 3 m
  • Jeffrey Epstein's Pilot Larry Visoski And His Testimony During The Ghisaline Maxwell Trial
    Jul 30 2025
    Larry Visoski—Epstein’s long‑time pilot—testified as the first prosecution witness in Maxwell’s trial, describing Ghislaine Maxwell’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s world as his de facto “Number 2,” responsible for managing non-business affairs such as properties, household logistics, and aircraft hospitality. He walked jurors through the layout and opulence of Epstein’s main estates: the 10,000‑acre Zorro Ranch in New Mexico, the Upper East Side townhouse, and Little St. James Island—each stocked with extravagant amenities overseen by Maxwell.


    Despite nearly three decades of flying hundreds—or thousands—of flights aboard Epstein’s Gulfstream, Boeing 727 (i.e. the “Lolita Express”), and helicopters, Visoski professed never witnessing any sexual acts or improper behavior, especially involving minors. He emphasized that he never observed sex toys, used condoms, or underage girls flying unaccompanied and appearing younger than about twenty. He also confirmed high-profile passengers such as Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Kevin Spacey, and Chris Tucker, but consistently denied witnessing any misconduct during flights.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    45 m
  • Was The Ghislaine Maxwell Trial A "Witch Hunt?"
    Jul 29 2025
    Claims that Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial was a "witch hunt" reveal more about the people making the claim than the actual proceedings themselves. Framing her prosecution as political theater or scapegoating for Epstein’s death ignores the mountains of evidence presented by survivors, investigators, and even Maxwell’s own associates. She wasn’t dragged into court on vague allegations or hearsay—she was tried based on detailed, corroborated accounts of her role in recruiting, grooming, and enabling the abuse of underage girls over many years. Calling that a “witch hunt” is a rhetorical shield—an attempt to reframe a hard-earned moment of accountability as hysteria, all while ignoring the systemic failures and powerful networks that allowed Epstein’s operation to flourish unchecked.

    This revisionist push to rebrand Maxwell as some kind of martyr isn’t just offensive—it’s dangerous. It discredits survivors, undermines public trust in criminal accountability, and fuels the exact kind of misinformation campaign that let Epstein operate in plain sight for decades. The “witch hunt” narrative serves a particular crowd: those desperate to deflect scrutiny from the institutions, financiers, and power brokers who were too close for comfort. If anything, Maxwell’s trial barely scratched the surface. To call it overreach is not just dishonest—it’s a calculated distraction from the justice that remains unserved.

    To contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:


    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10467497/Prince-Andrews-ex-Lady-Victoria-Hervey-44-says-Ghislaine-Maxwells-trial-witch-hunt.html
    Más Menos
    32 m
  • In Their Own Words: "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 4)(7/29/25)
    Jul 29 2025
    The document MJ v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD, filed on September 17, 2010 in the Southern District of Florida, involves a civil lawsuit brought by a plaintiff identified as “MJ” against Jeffrey Epstein. According to publicly available summaries of this and similar filings from the same time period, MJ was a minor at the time of the alleged abuse. The complaint accuses Epstein of sexually abusing and trafficking MJ while exploiting his wealth and power to silence and control her. MJ alleged that Epstein engaged in a pattern of recruiting underage girls under the guise of offering them money for massages, only for the encounters to turn sexually exploitative. The suit contends that Epstein used his Palm Beach residence as a base for this operation and that he was enabled by associates who helped him procure and manipulate the victims.

    The complaint further claims that Epstein committed multiple violations of federal and state laws, including sexual battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violations of civil rights statutes protecting minors. MJ's legal team argued that the long-term psychological damage from Epstein’s abuse warranted significant compensatory and punitive damages. The case forms part of a broader group of lawsuits filed by various women against Epstein around that time, many of whom described nearly identical patterns of abuse. These cases contributed to the growing body of evidence surrounding Epstein’s trafficking network long before his 2019 arrest and death.









    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.flsd.365238.1.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    19 m
  • In Their Own Words: "MJ" Doe 's Allegations Made Against Jeffrey Epstein (Part 3)(7/29/25)
    Jul 29 2025
    The document MJ v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD, filed on September 17, 2010 in the Southern District of Florida, involves a civil lawsuit brought by a plaintiff identified as “MJ” against Jeffrey Epstein. According to publicly available summaries of this and similar filings from the same time period, MJ was a minor at the time of the alleged abuse. The complaint accuses Epstein of sexually abusing and trafficking MJ while exploiting his wealth and power to silence and control her. MJ alleged that Epstein engaged in a pattern of recruiting underage girls under the guise of offering them money for massages, only for the encounters to turn sexually exploitative. The suit contends that Epstein used his Palm Beach residence as a base for this operation and that he was enabled by associates who helped him procure and manipulate the victims.

    The complaint further claims that Epstein committed multiple violations of federal and state laws, including sexual battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violations of civil rights statutes protecting minors. MJ's legal team argued that the long-term psychological damage from Epstein’s abuse warranted significant compensatory and punitive damages. The case forms part of a broader group of lawsuits filed by various women against Epstein around that time, many of whom described nearly identical patterns of abuse. These cases contributed to the growing body of evidence surrounding Epstein’s trafficking network long before his 2019 arrest and death.









    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.flsd.365238.1.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    13 m
  • Dual Sovereignty: The Legal Sledgehammer Waiting for Ghislaine Maxwell If Pardoned (Part 2) (7/29/25)
    Jul 29 2025
    If Donald Trump were to issue a presidential pardon to Ghislaine Maxwell for her federal crimes, the doctrine of dual sovereignty could allow the state of New York to pursue separate charges against her without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. This legal principle recognizes that the federal government and state governments are distinct sovereigns, each with the authority to enforce their own laws. Therefore, a pardon at the federal level does not immunize a person from state prosecution for conduct that also violates state law. If Maxwell’s actions—such as recruiting and trafficking minors—also violated New York state statutes, she could face a new, independent indictment from the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office or New York Attorney General, regardless of the federal pardon.

    New York has already demonstrated its willingness to pursue high-profile sex trafficking and abuse cases, particularly when federal accountability fails or falters. The state has broad human trafficking, sexual abuse, and child endangerment laws that overlap with Maxwell’s federally convicted conduct. If prosecutors believe there is sufficient evidence that Maxwell’s crimes occurred within New York’s jurisdiction or harmed residents of the state, they could initiate charges anew under state law. In fact, the political and public appetite for state-level accountability could intensify following a federal pardon, as it would be seen by many as a miscarriage of justice. In that case, dual sovereignty becomes not just a legal tool—but a last-resort mechanism to ensure that Maxwell still faces consequences.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    11 m