Atheist Logic By Experiment Or Agreement? – Ep.355 – The Great Debate – Bahnsen’s 2nd Opening – Part 2

Atheist Logic By Experiment Or Agreement?

Finishing up Bahnsen’s attempt to help out his atheist opponent provide justification for his use of logic, we look at logic being shown through experimentation or agreement. And like the good Christian Bahnsen is, he provides a good overview and then sinks the foundation of the atheist to claim any grounding for logic.

TIMELINE:

00:00 – Introduction
01:47 – Atheist Logic From A Posteriori?
04:07 – Are Laws Of Logic Contingent Under Atheism?
06:29 – Why Do Laws Of Logic Work In Different Areas The Same
07:50 – Atheist Logic Just Linguistic Convention?
09:27 – If So Then They’re Culturally Relative
11:59 – Why Do Atheists Decry Moral Failure Of Christians
13:13 – What Type Does One Give To Back Up Atheistic Materialistic Logic
15:04 – Atheists Steal From Christians To Use Logic
15:45 – Conclusion

BOOK LINKS:

The Great Debate – Does God Exist? – Edited and Commentary by Joshua Pillows

Debate Transcript Video
The Bahnsen Institute

All episodes, short clips, & blog – https://www.cavetothecross.com