AI underwriting compared to Human underwriting

Speed & Efficiency

AI Underwriting:

Processes applications in seconds to minutes.

1.Can instantly pull data from multiple sources (credit reports, bank statements, income verification, property valuations, etc.).

Ideal for high-volume, standardized cases.

Human Underwriter:

Takes hours to days, depending on complexity.

Manually reviews documents, contacts third parties, and applies professional judgment.

Slower, especially for complex or edge cases.

2. Data Handling

AI:

Uses algorithms and machine learning to analyze massive datasets.

Can detect patterns humans might miss (e.g., spending behavior, alternative data like utility payments, even digital footprints in some markets).

Human:

Relies on traditional documentation (pay stubs, tax returns, appraisals).

Limited by human bandwidth—can’t process as much raw data at once.

3. Consistency & Bias

AI:

Decisions are consistent with its rules and training data.

However, if the data it’s trained on is biased, the system can replicate or even amplify those biases.

Human:

Brings subjective judgment. Can weigh special circumstances that don’t fit a neat rule.

Risk of inconsistency—two underwriters might interpret the same file differently.

May have unconscious bias, but also flexibility to override rigid criteria.

4. Risk Assessment

AI:

Excels at quantifiable risks (credit scores, loan-to-value ratios, historical claim data).

Weak at unstructured or nuanced factors (e.g., a borrower with an unusual income stream, or a claim with unclear circumstances).

Human:

Strong at contextual judgment—understanding unique borrower situations, exceptions, or “gray areas.”

Can pick up on red flags that an algorithm might miss (e.g., forged documents, conflicting information).

5. Regulation & Accountability

AI:

Regulators are still catching up. Requires transparency in decision-making (explainable AI).

Hard to appeal an AI decision if it can’t explain its reasoning clearly.

Human:

Provides a clear chain of accountability—borrower can request explanations or escalate.

Easier for compliance teams to audit decision-making.

6. Cost & Scalability

AI:

Scales cheaply—one system can process thousands of applications simultaneously.

Lower ongoing labor costs once implemented.

Human:

Labor-intensive, costs grow with volume.

Better suited for complex, high-value, or unusual cases rather than mass processing.

✅ Bottom line:

AI underwriting is best for speed, scale, and straightforward cases.

Human underwriters are best for nuanced judgment, exceptions, and handling edge cases.

Most modern institutions use a hybrid model: AI handles the bulk of simple files, while humans step in for complex or flagged cases.

tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog

didier malagies nmls#212566
dda mortgage nmls#324329

Support the show