A Normal Family: The JonBenet Ramsey Case Revisited

De: anormalfamilypodcast
  • Resumen

  • The day after Christmas, 1996, six-year-old JonBenet Ramsey was found dead in her family home. Twenty-five years later, the case remains unsolved. In this podcast series, we examine the evidence from every angle. Meticulously incorporating the original source material, including many previously-overlooked details, we can finally make sense of this perplexing mystery. Please support our content with a small donation: https:/buymeacoff.ee/jonbenetpodcast/ Listen on Apple: https://apple.co/2YG9Sav Listen on Spotify: https://sptfy.com/6N1n Listen on Google Podcasts: https://bit.ly/3olBx9C Listen on Podbean: https://anormalfamilypodcast.podbean.com/
    Copyright 2021 All rights reserved.
    Más Menos
Episodios
  • Episode 8: Did an Intruder Do It? (The JonBenet Ramsey Case Revisited)
    Dec 26 2021

    In our final episode we examine the intruder theory, and look ahead to the future of the JonBenet Ramsey case.

    Music by CO.AG and Lucor. Vocal contributions from Erik Peabody and Meredith Nudo.

    Más Menos
    29 m
  • Episode 7: Did Burke Do It? (The JonBenet Ramsey Case Revisited)
    Dec 20 2021

    A closer look at the internet’s favorite theory—did Burke Ramsey kill JonBenet? Music by CO.AG and Lucor. Vocal contributions from Erik Peabody and Meredith Nudo.

    Más Menos
    31 m
  • Episode 6: Did John Do It? (The JonBenet Ramsey Case Revisited)
    Dec 12 2021

    We examine the theory that JonBenét Ramsey was killed by her father, John.

    Music by CO.AG and Lucor. Vocal contributions from Erik Peabody and Meredith Nudo.

    Más Menos
    29 m
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre A Normal Family: The JonBenet Ramsey Case Revisited

Calificaciones medias de los clientes
Total
  • 3.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    4
  • 4 estrellas
    2
  • 3 estrellas
    3
  • 2 estrellas
    2
  • 1 estrella
    0
Ejecución
  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    6
  • 4 estrellas
    2
  • 3 estrellas
    1
  • 2 estrellas
    2
  • 1 estrella
    0
Historia
  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    5
  • 4 estrellas
    2
  • 3 estrellas
    2
  • 2 estrellas
    2
  • 1 estrella
    0

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.

Ordenar por:
Filtrar por:
  • Total
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    5 out of 5 stars

Recent and long form look at the investigation

Great narrator with clear audio clips. Well put long form podcast about this infamous investigation.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

  • Total
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    5 out of 5 stars

Best yet on Ramsey case

this is good I cannot stop listening the insight in podcast is well above average

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

  • Total
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    4 out of 5 stars

Well made, but the bias was a problem

The series was well made with short episodes well-narrated and plenty of interesting clips. However, the creator has a clear Patsy Did It (PDI) bias and doesn’t provide a firm case for any of the other theories. This is particularly apparent in his assessment of the Burke Did It (BDI) theory, where he cannot help but cast doubt and qualify every statement to make it seem less likely, while uncritically accepting even the most tenuous aspects of PDI theory.

A good example is how everyone in JonBenet’s family says she liked pageants and did them for fun, but he takes the word of an unrelated nanny who says she didn’t like it as evidence that Patsy was forcing her to live vicariously through her daughter. At the same time, a nanny reports that Burke hit his sister in the head with a golf club and heard this from Patsy in confidence, but the podcaster discredits her because Patsy later said that he did it by mistake.

It it was a bit more balanced and fair to each theory it would have been much better.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

  • Total
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    3 out of 5 stars

Biased and Amateur Psychology

Blames the mother with no real evidence…just a lot of speculation about child abuse and enmeshment. Seems like an agenda to build case against Patsy Ramsay. . Nothing new here although the trailer implies a solution.Its not here.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

  • Total
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    5 out of 5 stars

Yes,but…

I totally respect the previous review, as a mother of three myself, I cannot imagine life beyond my children if something terrible happened to them-nonetheless a murder! That being said, I was also raised by a narcissistic mother and can recognize the warning flags. Also, this podcast brings up points I have never heard before, which is refreshing. It’s definitely worth a listen and you can make up your own mind. For me? There’s two pieces of evidence that equally contradict each other-the ransom note and the DNA evidence, which are BOTH fallible. Good luck and happy listening!

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

  • Total
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    3 out of 5 stars

Felt VERY biased to me…

I wish I knew what happened to that sweet child. I have my personal opinions, and i think it was someone who didn’t live in that home but someone the family knew. I know there is more evidence and more suspects and was hoping this podcast would delve more into that. It is described as being non-biased but blatantly suggests that mom is the killer. The fact that never is stated is that the child had DNA in her sexual organ ….how does a woman leave that? And why isn’t this DNA being retested now since science has come so far? They caught Golden State Killer with super old evidence why not now? I’m just sad by how investigators blame the parents because of shitty police/detective work.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

  • Total
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    2 out of 5 stars

Sadly biased against the Ramsey family.

Wouldn’t recommend, the writer is clearly biased against the Ramsey family and parroting what numerous others have reported

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

  • Total
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    2 out of 5 stars

Totally Swayed

This is so sad, the narrator and or story writer is completely biased, against Patsy Ramsey and uses her basic material responses against her in the worst way, since obviously if you follow this case, as Patsy is dead and cannot defend herself. I consume more true crime than I’d like to admit and therefore feel almost dirty after listening to the episodes. Any Mother on earth would have responded as she did, defend herself as she did, go insane as she did, after losing a child whose death she was not guilty of in my opinion.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona