A Brushstroke of Jurisprudence: US Judge Declares AI-Created Art Non-Copyrightable
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
A Brushstroke of Jurisprudence: US Judge Declares AI-Created Art Non-Copyrightable
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
Acerca de esta escucha
In August 2023, a landmark U.S. court ruling denied copyright protection for AI-generated art, deeming it ineligible due to a lack of human authorship. The decision came in a lawsuit by Stephen Thaler against the U.S. Copyright Office for rejecting his application to copyright an image created by his AI system. While Thaler plans to appeal, experts say the verdict underscores current copyright law requiring human creativity. However, AI-assisted art involving substantial human input may still qualify for protection. As AI becomes integral to the creative process, this ruling hints at the complex legal challenges ahead in distinguishing human versus machine authorship. The case significantly develops the evolving relationship between AI, copyright law, and art.
Blog Post:
https://blog.cprompt.ai/a-brushstroke-of-jurisprudence-us-judge-declares-ai-created-art-non-copyrightable
Our YouTube channel
https://youtube.com/@cpromptai
Follow us on Twitter
Kabir - https://x.com/mjkabir
CPROMPT - https://x.com/cpromptai
Blog
https://blog.cprompt.ai
CPROMPT
https://cprompt.ai