149: Grantmaking Due Diligence: A Risk-Based Approach for Charitable Giving
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
Welcome to EO Radio Show – Your Nonprofit Legal Resource. I'm Cynthia Rowland, and episode 149 of EO Radio Show provides a checklist for developing or improving the diligence checklist for grantmaking charities.
Some grantmakers do little more than check the IRS database to confirm that the grantee is recognized as a public charity. Others require reams of information from the grantees. What is the best approach? Well, as we lawyers always like to say, it depends. What I'm trying to do in this episode is give you a practical, staff-level checklist of the core due diligence items grantors should cover when evaluating a charitable organization for a grant. This episode is structured for a U.S.-based grantor, whether it's a public charity or a private foundation, and I flag enhancements for foreign or higher-risk grants.
Show Notes:
Tax Exempt Organization Search | Internal Revenue Service
EO Radio Show state filing requirements playlist
Title and Links to Episodes
EO Radio Show #99: Nonprofit Basics: International Grantmaking - Part 1 Overview and Antiterrorism Rules
EO Radio Show #101: Nonprofit Basics: International Grantmaking – Part 2 Income Tax Withholding Rules
EO Radio Show #102: Nonprofit Basics: International Grantmaking Part 3 -Special Rules for Private Foundations
EO Radio Show #131: Nonprofit Basics: Grant Agreement Best Practices
EO Radio Show #132: Nonprofit Basics: Grant Agreements—Matching Grants, IP, Recoverable Grants & More
OFAC Sanctions List Search
If you have suggestions for topics you would like us to discuss, please email us at eoradioshow@fbm.com.
Additional episodes can be found at EORadioShowByFarella.com.
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to be, nor should it be interpreted as, legal advice or opinion.