139) Bullied by Q-Com? It’s Completely Your Fault. Podcast Por  arte de portada

139) Bullied by Q-Com? It’s Completely Your Fault.

139) Bullied by Q-Com? It’s Completely Your Fault.

Escúchala gratis

Ver detalles del espectáculo
In this episode, Sudeep grills Sharan on a brutally honest question - why are so many emerging consumer brands getting steamrolled by Quick Commerce platforms?Sharan shares firsthand founder conversations and hard-earned insights to make a bold claim: Q-Com isn’t the problem. You are, if you’re treating it like a business model instead of a channel. What follows is a fiery, insight-packed breakdown of how to engage with platforms like Blinkit, Zepto, and Instamart without losing your brand, your margins, or your mind.CONVERSATION HIGHLIGHTSVisibility ≠ Viability: Why being listed on Q-Com might be hurting more than helping.Modern Trade Déjà Vu: How today’s Q-Com behavior mirrors yesterday’s Modern Trade chaos.The Double Jeopardy Trap: Small brands pay more, get less, and stay stuck in the cycle.The Myth of D2C: Why most Indian brand websites are a disaster—and Q-Com feels like a savior.Real Moats Are Boring: How brands like Atomberg and Heads Up For Tails built strength through offline first.When to Use Q-Com: A framework to decide if you’re there for discovery, sampling, or convenience.Margins vs. Ambition: How pressure from investors leads to dangerous trade-offs.What Success Actually Looks Like: Building control, customer experience, and long-term equity.KEY TAKEAWAYSPlatforms Are Tools, Not Strategies: You’re not on Q-Com. Q-Com is on you, until you build your own roads.Define the Role Before You Spend: Use Q-Com for trials? Great—treat the losses like a marketing budget.Driving repeat purchase? Then you have the leverage.Want visibility? Budget with ROI clarity.Distribution Is the Ultimate Moat: You can’t build a brand without owning how it reaches customers.D2C ≠ Selling on Shopify: If your logistics fail and you can’t control CX, it’s not D2C—it’s rented reach.Sample, Don’t Sell at a Loss: In FMCG, CAC vs LTV is flawed. Give it for free rather than burn margins permanently.Start Small, But Start Now: Even 100 offline stores in your city is a step toward real independence.QUOTES“Visibility cannot come at the cost of viability.”“If Q-Com is your business model, go work there. You’re just a supplier.”“Distribution is expensive, yes - but being dependent is far more costly.”“There is no LTV in FMCG. You don’t acquire customers. You rent occasions.”“The best brands aren’t avoiding Q-Com. They’re just not addicted to it.”If you’re a founder, marketer, or investor in consumer brands, this episode is your wake-up call. Before you chase growth on platforms, make sure you actually own the business you’re building.As always, send your feedback and topic suggestions to mail@cobbcast.net!Please tell us what topics you'd like to have discussed on the CoBB, by filling in this ⁠CONTENT SUGGESTION FORM⁠⁠It only takes a few minutes, and it will help us provide you with the content most relevant to you.SHOW WEBSITECONNECT WITH OUR HOSTSSudeep Chawla on ⁠Linkedin⁠Sharavana Raghavan on ⁠Linkedin⁠FOLLOW USCoBB - ⁠LinkedInCoBB - Instagram⁠CREDITSAlbum Art & Design by ting.inVoiceovers by Anjale StephanosMusic from Zapsplat.com
Todavía no hay opiniones