#021 - From Pray and Patch to Proactive: Modernizing Embedded Security Podcast Por  arte de portada

#021 - From Pray and Patch to Proactive: Modernizing Embedded Security

#021 - From Pray and Patch to Proactive: Modernizing Embedded Security

Escúchala gratis

Ver detalles del espectáculo

OFERTA POR TIEMPO LIMITADO | Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes

$14.95/mes despues- se aplican términos.

Visit our sponsor's website to learn more about their embedded security solutions at https://www.RunSafeSecurity.com/jacob

This episode explores the critical shift from reactive "patch and pray" security approaches to proactive embedded security strategies. Host Jacob discusses common vulnerabilities in embedded systems, real-world security threats from nation-state actors, and practical tools and processes developers can implement to secure their devices throughout the entire development lifecycle.

Key Takeaways:

• Memory exploits (buffer overflows, out-of-bounds reads/writes, use-after-free) are the most common embedded system vulnerabilities
• Nation-state actors like Voltaifun are actively targeting critical infrastructure through embedded devices
• Even simple connected devices like $20 coffee makers pose significant security risks through botnets and grid manipulation
• Supply chain attacks have risen 700% in recent years, requiring secure programming and signed keys throughout manufacturing
• Threat Model Security Analysis (TMSA) should be performed upfront to identify critical data and potential attack vectors
• Hardware isolation using ARM TrustZone, multi-core processors, or memory protection units provides essential security layers
• Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) helps track open source components and monitor for newly discovered vulnerabilities
• Static and dynamic analysis tools should be integrated into CI/CD pipelines for continuous security monitoring
• Security must be considered throughout the entire device lifecycle, from design to end-of-life decommissioning
• Proactive security approaches using runtime protection tools are more effective than reactive patching strategies

Todavía no hay opiniones