Yoga Is Not a Wedding

Why Patanjali’s Yoga Sutras Aim at Separation, Not Union

For centuries, yoga has been described as a path of union—union with the divine, with the cosmos, or with one’s “true self.” Studio language, devotional reinterpretations, and modern nonduality have all reinforced this assumption.

This book argues that this story is wrong.

Drawing directly from the Yoga Sūtras, Yoga Is Not a Wedding makes a careful but uncompromising case that Patañjali’s yoga is not a doctrine of mystical union at all, but a disciplined path of disentanglement. Its culmination is kaivalya: the autonomy of consciousness, freed from identification with nature, mind, and experience.

Rather than blending yoga with Vedānta, Tantra, Bhakti, or contemporary nondual spirituality, this book refuses synthesis. It reads the Yoga Sūtras on their own terms and follows their internal logic to its conclusion—one that is far more radical than modern interpretations often allow.

Inside the Book

• Why yoga came to be misread as a path of union
• A close reading of draṣṭṛ and dṛśya (the seer and the seen)
• Why saṁyoga—conjunction, not separation—is the root problem
• What kaivalya actually means, philosophically and experientially
• Why liberation does not require withdrawal from the world
• How practice changes when the goal is separation rather than unity
• Where yoga clearly diverges from Advaita Vedānta, Tantra, Buddhism, and modern nonduality movements