The Rigor of Angels

Borges, Heisenberg, Kant, and the Ultimate Nature of Reality

De: William Egginton

Narrado por: David Glass

A NEW YORK TIMES AND NEW YORKER BEST BOOK OF THE YEAR • A poet, a physicist, and a philosopher explored the greatest enigmas in the universe—the nature of free will, the strange fabric of the cosmos, the true limits of the mind—and each in their own way uncovered a revelatory truth about our place in the world

“[A] mind-expanding book. . . . Elegantly written.” —The New York Times

“A remarkable synthesis of the thoughts, ideas, and discoveries of three of the greatest minds that our species has produced.” —John Banville, The Wall Street Journal

Argentine poet Jorge Luis Borges was madly in love when his life was shattered by painful heartbreak. But the breakdown that followed illuminated an incontrovertible truth—that love is necessarily imbued with loss, that the one doesn’t exist without the other. German physicist Werner Heisenberg was fighting with the scientific establishment on the meaning of the quantum realm’s absurdity when he had his own epiphany—that there is no such thing as a complete, perfect description of reality. Prussian philosopher Immanuel Kant pushed the assumptions of human reason to their mind-bending conclusions, but emerged with an idea that crowned a towering philosophical system—that the human mind has fundamental limits, and those limits undergird both our greatest achievements as well as our missteps.

Through fiction, science, and philosophy, the work of these three thinkers coalesced around the powerful, haunting fact that there is an irreconcilable difference between reality “out there” and reality as we experience it. Out of this profound truth comes a multitude of galvanizing ideas: the notion of selfhood, free will, and purpose in human life; the roots of morality, aesthetics, and reason; and the origins and nature of the cosmos itself.

As each of these thinkers shows, every one of us has an incomplete picture of the world. But it's only as mortal, finite beings are we able to experience the world in its richness and breathtaking majesty. A soaring and lucid reflection on the lives and work of Borges, Heisenberg, and Kant, The Rigor of Angels movingly demonstrates that the mysteries of our place in the world may always loom over us—not as a threat, but as a reminder of our humble humanity.

©2023 William Egginton (P)2023 Random House Audio

Reseñas de la Crítica

"A New Yorker best book of the year • A New York Times Notable Book • A New York Times Book Review Editors' Choice

“A joint biography of three figures who called attention…to the problems and paradoxes that emerge when we try to extend our ordinary way of seeing the world beyond the human scale…. Lucid and well-written…. An impressive work of scholarship.” —The New York Review of Books

“[A] mind-expanding book. . . . Elegantly written. . . . This is a book about the tiniest of things—the position of an electron, an instant of change. It is also about the biggest of things—the cosmos, infinity, the possibility of free will. Egginton works through ideas by grounding them in his characters’ lives. . . . The beauty of this book is that Egginton encourages us to recognize all of these complicated truths as part of our reality, even if the ‘ultimate nature’ of that reality will remain forever elusive. We are finite beings whose perspective will always be limited; but those limits are also what give rise to possibility. When we choose what to observe, we insert our freedom to choose into nature. As Egginton writes, ‘We are, and ever will be, active participants in the universe we discover.’” —The New York Times

“The Rigor of Angels—the title is taken from a phrase in a Borges story— is a remarkable synthesis of the thoughts, ideas, and discoveries of three of the greatest minds that our species has produced. The richness of the book cannot be fully acknowledged in the space of a review. Mr. Egginton advances a great many knotty arguments and propositions, but he is never less than exciting, provocative, and illuminating.” —John Banville, The Wall Street Journal

Wonderful synthesis is science, poetry, and philosophy

If you are interested in consciousness, physics, philosophy, poetry, or all of the above, if you like Carlo Rovelli; if you tried to slog through Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid, then this approachable, engrossing book is for you!

Excellent book

A very stimulating read. Well written and engaging. I wish there were more books like this connecting science with philosophy and literature.

Perhaps the best book I’ve read all year

I expect that this is a book with a niche audience. To appreciate this book, one has to find multiple spheres of investigation. Interesting: philosophy from the classical to the modern, physics, and the associated math across multiple centuries, astronomy, and cosmology, and at least a sprinkling of theology or metaphysics or at least moral philosophy. I am 100% the target demographic for a book like this.

I will say that this is well narrated, well paced, and with enough scaffolding to allow for meaningful connections across its diverse subjects. And so as long as you have more than a passing interest in these topics, I expect you will also find this book interesting even if at times it goes over your head . For me, the times it went over my head were perhaps the most interesting. In another life, I would have been a professional epistemologist, and so the ways in which that theme is woven throughout this book left me at times laughing in delight, and at times speechless in wonder. All that to say this book was outstanding.

Relating the work of Kant, Borges and Heisenberg

almost poetic flow, excellent exposition of the similarity between three men of such diverse backgrounds, times, languages, and culture - all indelible present in the world whose foundations they influenced

Mixed Sensations

An excellent book !!! This is one a philosopher might suggest to their friends who are laypersons. David Glass delivers with obvious understanding of the subject matter. An adroit performance — dynamic, confident, and informed.

However...
Sonically, this is well below par. A constant upper frequency fizz persists throughout. Maybe an encoding/compression issue, or transmission problem? Distracting and almost disturbing. Exacerbated when slightly speedier playback speeds are employed.
I listen to a lot of content with the sand equipment; no other content has quite this issue. I know. I'm an audio engineer with over four decades of professional experience.

Great book but

This is a really good book and will get you thinking. And that’s the problem. You will need to go back and reread parts which is tough to do when you are listening and not reading. Better to buy the book or get it from the library. It’s worth it and you will understand a lot more

The narrator is also not the best. He sounds like William f Buckley very odd accent and to my ears annoying and pretentious. Not sure where he is from but only WFB spoke like this.

So read it don’t listen to it. Very good book and worth reading

Incredible.

This is one of the best books I have ever listened to. I’ll be getting a physical copy to read it again. And then again.

Fantastic book; Ridiculous narration

This book is so good that I endured the whole ridiculous performance of the narrator. Interesting, well written, and utterly compelling; highly recommend.

Now. About that narration. Every sentence is read as though it’s a movie trailor, complete with inappropriate emphases in places that distract from the meaning of the sentence, mispronounced words (what professional voice actor doesn’t bother to look up “Junta” or “Pinochet”?!), occasional affectations of a British accent, and long run-ons for no apparent reason. It’s as if the narrator was simply enamored with the sound of his own voice and forgot he was trying to convey intelligible meaning through his reading. As one reviewer said, it’s embarrassing to listen to.

That’s how good the book is, though, that I made it through the audio version nonetheless.

The most ridiculous narration

The narration is so over the top and theatrical that it truly detracts from what is otherwise an innovative and compelling thread. I was actually embarrassed listening to this.

Narrator

The narrator sounded like he was trying to imitate Carl Sagan. But instead makes the ideas sound bombastic.